Rangers shut out the Sabres, 4-0
The Rangers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.38–2.92 and won anyway.
The underlying story
New York won 4-0, but Buffalo controlled the game. The Sabres owned 55% of expected goals yet lost without scoring—a heist powered by goaltending.
I. Shesterkin (NYR) stopped 2.92 goals above expected, posting a 1.000 SV% against all 37 shots. A. Lyon (BUF) allowed 0.62 more than expected, posting a 0.906 SV%. That's a three-goal difference in goaltending.
Buffalo's problem wasn't chance creation. They built five rebound opportunities and held a 53% share of shot attempts. The problem was execution. Against high-danger looks, Buffalo managed one to New York's two. The Rangers scored twice on just twenty rush attempts, overperforming their xG by 1.62. One team converted; one couldn't.
Shesterkin made sure of it.
The danger ladder
BUF went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.88 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
NYR finished +1.6 against expected, BUF -2.9 — I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 2.9 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 3-for-22, BUF 0-for-25. NYR scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- NYR stole this one. BUF owned 55% of the xG and lost.
- I. Shesterkin (NYR) stopped 2.9 goals above expected.
- NYR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
- BUF created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- BUF underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
- NYR outperformed their expected goals by 1.6 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- I. Shesterkin (NYR) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.