Motion-blurred skater in a Winnipeg Jets sweater
Breakdown · WPG at NYI

Jets pull away from the Islanders

The verdict · coin flip

The Jets won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

WPG 5 · NYI 2
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 12:24 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Islanders were the better team for most of the night—they dominated possession, generating 57% of shot attempts and outgunning Winnipeg 3.92 to 3.66 in expected goals. But the Jets won 5-2, and that gap between what the play suggested and what the scoreboard showed is this game's entire story.

E. Comrie made it happen. The Jets goaltender stopped 33 of 35 shots and finished 1.92 goals above expected—a save percentage of 0.943 that turned a coin-flip game into a blowout. Across the crease, I. Sorokin saved 21 of 25 for a 0.840 SV%, undercutting his xG by 1.92 and leaving the Islanders unable to capitalize on their chances.

The Jets' efficiency was surgical in the zones that matter. They converted 2 of 4 high-danger chances (50%), while the Islanders managed 0 for 5. On the rush—where chances are born from transition rather than setup—Winnipeg scored 4 times on 18 attempts. New York managed 2 on 37. That's the difference between a team that can finish and one that couldn't, even when it had the territory.

Winnipeg's shot quality was sharper too: 0.078 expected goals per attempt versus New York's 0.048. The Islanders were creating chances; the Jets were creating the right ones.

Mark Scheifele's backhander from the doorstep in the third period (P3, 17:35) was the turning point—a simple play that reflected the larger truth: when the Islanders gave Winnipeg an opening, the Jets took it clean.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 13
WPG
5
NYI
2

Jets pull away from the Islanders

Chances 3.7 – 3.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Jets took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
WPG
3.66
NYI
3.92
48% of the chances52%

The board read WPG 5, NYI 2. The chances read WPG 3.7, NYI 3.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WPG
+1.3
goals above expected
WPG3.66 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
NYI3.92 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Islanders left 1.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 07:35WPGM. Barron1–0
  2. P1 11:48WPGN. NiederreiterPP2–0
  3. P2 02:05NYIJ. Pageau2–1
  4. P2 02:19WPGL. Stanley3–1
  5. P2 12:39WPGT. Pearson4–1
  6. P2 14:45NYIE. Heineman4–2
  7. P3 17:35WPGM. ScheifeleEN5–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WPG
33 shots
5
Final
91 shots
NYI
58 shots
2
WPG attackNYI attack
WPG NYI Goal
33
shots · 5 in
58
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WPGNYI
2 / 4
1.53 xG
High danger
0 / 5
1.20 xG
2 / 14
1.69 xG
Medium
1 / 16
1.74 xG
1 / 29
0.44 xG
Low
1 / 61
0.98 xG

The Islanders went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
E. Comrie
+1.9
WPG · 33/35
D
I. Sorokin
−0.3
NYI · 21/25
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Jets pull away from the Islanders

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–12
  1. 07:35WPGM. Barron(C. Koepke, L. Stanley)1–0
  2. 11:48WPGN. Niederreiterpower play(G. Nyquist, J. Toews)2–0
2ndshots 11–12
  1. 02:05NYIJ. Pageau(T. DeAngelo)2–1
  2. 02:19WPGL. Stanley(T. Pearson, M. Barron)3–1
  3. 12:39WPGT. Pearson(N. Niederreiter)4–1
  4. 14:45NYIE. Heineman(J. Drouin, M. Schaefer)4–2
3rdshots 5–11
  1. 17:35WPGM. Scheifeleempty net(K. Connor)5–2

score reads WPG–NYI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.66
WPG chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.3
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.082
WPG puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
36.4%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.66Expected goals3.92
NYI 52% of the chance quality
26Shots on goal35
4High-danger chances5
47All attempts (Corsi)82
Adjusted for score: WPG 31% · NYI 69%
Faceoffs · NYI won73%off40%neu24%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WPG2 / 4 · 1.53 xG
NYI0 / 5 · 1.20 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WPG2 / 14 · 1.69 xG
NYI1 / 16 · 1.74 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WPG1 / 29 · 0.44 xG
NYI1 / 61 · 0.98 xG

NYI went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.20 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WPG
5 G · 3.66 xG · +1.3
NYI
2 G · 3.92 xG · -1.9
0123456

WPG finished +1.3 against expected, NYI -1.9.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WPG
WRIST3/22
SNAP0/3
BACKHAND2/5
SLAP0/1
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/14
NYI
WRIST0/38
SNAP1/7
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/6
TIP IN1/2
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/24
WPG
NYI
Off the rush
4 G on 18
2.36 xG
2 G on 37
3.11 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 6
0.86 xG
0 G on 3
0.30 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 3-for-22, NYI 0-for-38. WPG scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
E. Comrie
WPG · 33/35 · .943
+1.9
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/51.2+1.2
Medium1/161.7+0.7
Low1/611.0-0.0

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Sorokin
NYI · 21/25 · .840
-0.3
saved above expected
D
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/41.5-0.5
Medium2/141.7-0.3
Low1/290.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

91 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WPG
33 shots
5
Final
91 shots
NYI
58 shots
2
WPG attackNYI attack
WPG NYI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WPG left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
L. Stanley
#64 · D · WPG
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 18:22 on ice · +1
M. Barron
#36 · C · WPG
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 15:42 on ice · +2
N. Niederreiter
#62 · R · WPG
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 13:41 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Mon, Oct 13
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelSep 22, 2:15 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects this game at 3.2–3.3 with the Islanders at 51% win probability—as close to a pick'em as you'll find. Two evenly matched teams on paper.

The season-long numbers bear it out. Winnipeg's 5v5 xG% sits at 48.9% against the Islanders' 47.7%. Corsi% is an exact tie at 49.0%. The only gap is luck: Winnipeg PDO at 0.998, New York at 0.992—functionally identical.

Anders Lee drives the Islanders' offense at 1.20 xG/60, posting 9 goals and 20 assists with 2 high-danger goals on 6.4% shooting. Nino Niederreiter forms the counterweight for Winnipeg at 0.87 xG/60 with 6 goals and 6 assists and 3 high-danger goals on 8.6% shooting. Kyle Connor is the heavier scorer for Winnipeg at 0.83 xG/60, 25 goals and 30 assists, shooting at 13.0%. Bo Horvat provides New York's secondary scoring at 0.87 xG/60, 18 goals and 10 assists, 3 high-danger goals, 12.8% shooting.

Both teams show 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound goal rate. On defense, Winnipeg's weak link is Colin Miller; New York's is Alexander Romanov.

This one tilts on goaltending. Two teams with similar underlying metrics and matching depth—the game lives or dies in the crease.

Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NYI 51%
51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
WPG50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WPG 3.2–3.3 NYI; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WPG← edge
edge →NYI
48.9%47.7%
49.0%49.0%
2.973.13
3.103.43
2.792.79
3.122.88
0.9980.992

NYI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.998 vs 0.992) says WPG has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · No games yet
WPG
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
NYI
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
0.998
WPG PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.992
NYI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

TACTICALNYI

Shutdown Assignment: Islanders

Key matchup: Neutralize Nino Niederreiter (6G, 0.87 xG/60, 3 HD goals)

Key matchup: Neutralize Nino Niederreiter (6G, 0.87 xG/60, 3 HD goals)

TACTICALWPG

Shutdown Assignment: Jets

Key matchup: Neutralize Anders Lee (9G, 1.20 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

Key matchup: Neutralize Anders Lee (9G, 1.20 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

STRENGTHNYI

Anders Lee drives the Islanders offense

Anders Lee: 9G 20A, 1.20 xG/60, 2 high-danger goals.

WARNINGWPG

Exploitable minutes: Colin Miller

Colin Miller is on ice for 3.07 xGA/60 and 15 high-danger shots against this season.

Hunt matchups against Colin Miller's shifts with the top line.

Things to watch
  • Two evenly matched teams on paper — this one tilts on goaltending.
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next