Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at DAL

E. Merzlikins stands tall as the Blue Jackets edge the Stars

The Blue Jackets earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 12:37 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
5
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.76Expected goals3.83
55% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)23
8High-danger chances7
59Corsi (all attempts)46
Score-adjusted: 51% / 49%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The scoreline (5-1) overstates Columbus's dominance. The underlying metrics were closer — expected goals split 56-44 in favor of the Blue Jackets (4.76–3.83) — but E. Merzlikins' 0.957 save percentage carried the load. He stopped 2.83 goals above expectation, while Dallas compounded the problem by underperforming their own xG by the same margin.

Columbus won the underlying battle on multiple fronts: they out-attempted Dallas 29–23 and won high-danger chances 8–7. The decisive edge was the power play — 2 goals on 5 shots (0.40 xG) against Dallas's ineffectual man-advantage work.

Kent Johnson's wrist shot from the point (P3, 17:00) signaled the tonal shift. B. Jenner (1G, 1A in 14:40) and A. Fantilli (1G, 1A in 13:40) capitalized on the momentum. Columbus was lethal in transition, scoring 4 goals on 28 rush attempts, while Dallas created 3 rebound chances and converted none. Columbus also created 3 rebounds without capitalizing, but the difference was finishing.

J. Oettinger faced 28 shots and stopped 24 (0.857), but the team's inefficiency determined the outcome. Dallas generated quality chances (3.83 xG) yet left with a single goal — a 2.83-goal shortfall that defined the night.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ2 / 8 · 3.03 xG
DAL1 / 7 · 1.78 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ3 / 10 · 1.14 xG
DAL0 / 14 · 1.62 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ0 / 41 · 0.60 xG
DAL0 / 25 · 0.43 xG

CBJ went 3-for-10 from medium danger on 1.14 expected goals — 1.9 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
5 G · 4.76 xG · +0.2
DAL
1 G · 3.83 xG · -2.8
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
E. MerzlikinsCBJ
+2.8
J. OettingerDAL
+0.8

CBJ finished +0.2 against expected, DAL -2.8 — E. Merzlikins (CBJ) saved 2.8 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
SNAP3/24
BACKHAND0/9
SLAP0/4
WRIST1/5
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED1/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/14
DAL
SNAP0/28
BACKHAND0/0
SLAP0/4
WRIST0/2
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED1/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/1
OTHER0/8
CBJ
DAL
Off the rush
4 G on 28 · 1.97 xG
1 G on 25 · 2.94 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.38 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.47 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: CBJ went 3-for-24, DAL 0-for-28. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Jenner
#38 · C · CBJ
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 14:40 TOI · +1
A. Fantilli
#19 · C · CBJ
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 13:40 TOI · +1
K. Johnson
#91 · C · CBJ
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 13:18 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • E. Merzlikins (CBJ) stopped 2.8 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (DAL 7, CBJ 8).
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 28 rush chances.
  • DAL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL underperformed xG by 2.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • E. Merzlikins (CBJ) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • CBJ power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 5 PP shots (0.40 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 12:35 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
DAL
Model favorite
49%
51%
CBJ50DAL

DAL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.52.5 DAL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →DAL
52.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
51.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.63xGF / 602.36
2.43xGA / 602.29
2.12Goals for / gm2.07
1.98Goals against / gm1.68
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.024

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Dallas enters at 51% win probability in a model projecting an essentially even game—2.5 expected goals apiece. This is as close to a pick'em as NHL matchmaking produces.

The Stars own a 7-3-0 stretch that papers over a narrower advantage. Columbus controls the puck decisively at 51.0% Corsi, while Dallas generates only 47.0% of shot attempts. Expected goals tell a similar story: no meaningful 5v5 edge, with Columbus at 52.0% and Dallas at 51.0%. Yet Dallas lives unsustainably. Its 1.024 PDO reveals a team converting chances at rates regression will punish and allowing far fewer rebound goals than talent predicts. Columbus sits neutral at 1.003.

Boone Jenner anchors Columbus's attack. His 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes arrives with 11 goals and 21 assists, though a 9.6% shooting rate signals he has hit the high end of variance. He has converted two high-danger chances, suggesting genuine quality underpins the volume. Mathieu Olivier provides secondary thrusts at 0.89 xG/60 with 12 goals, but his 13.3% shooting rate will not endure—one high-danger goal among his totals means he is punching above expected output.

Jason Robertson forms Dallas's entire offensive identity. His 0.96 xG/60 and 25-goal season drive the Stars, and his 12.4% shooting rate feels more durable than Olivier's. Michael Bunting chips in 8 goals and 14 assists, yet at 0.83 xG/60, he depends more on system efficiency than personal generation. Neither team sustains high-danger conversion at 0% or rebound goals at 0%, a matching void that points to incomplete tracking or circumstantial fortune.

Defensively, Columbus leans on Conor Garland, whose perimeter responsibilities and penalty-kill demands leave him exposed. Dallas's Tyler Myers carries similar liabilities. The model likes Dallas slightly. The underlying numbers suggest this is genuinely even—Columbus generates more shots, Dallas converts at unsustainable rates. Expect the Stars to target Garland while Jenner's volume and Dallas's regression toward league norms trade blows.

Three Stars

  • Boone Jenner (CBJ) — 0.98 xG/60, 11G 21A, consistent volume threat
  • Jason Robertson (DAL) — 0.96 xG/60, 25G 21A, Dallas's core creation
  • Michael Bunting (DAL) — 8G 14A, secondary scoring, elevated efficiency
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters