Motion-blurred skater in a New Jersey Devils sweater
Breakdown · MIN at NJD

N. Daws stands tall as the Devils edge the Wild

The verdict · stolen

The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.33–3.27 and won anyway.

MIN 1 · NJD 4
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 12:39 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Devils beat Minnesota 4-1 despite losing the expected goals battle, 3.27 to 4.33. The Wild dominated in quality chances—57% of the night's xG—yet New Jersey prevailed through goaltending.

N. Daws decided the game. He stopped 30 of 31 shots (0.968 SV%) and saved 3.33 goals above expected by turning away all nine high-danger chances Minnesota produced. The Wild converted zero of those nine. That gap—Minnesota 0/9, Daws 9/9 on high-danger attempts—was the difference.

The Devils' efficiency came from elsewhere. Despite ceding high-danger chances, New Jersey managed 35 shot attempts to Minnesota's 31 and scored twice off the rush. Jesper Bratt's wrist shot from the wing in the third period (18:43) typified how New Jersey made their chances count.

Minnesota's problem wasn't volume. They created eight rebound opportunities and zero conversions. Their shot quality of 0.064 expected goals per attempt—superior to New Jersey's 0.046—meant nothing without finishing. F. Gustavsson made 31 of 34 saves (0.912 SV%) in a losing effort, undone by teammates who couldn't convert the chances he'd earned.

This is the flip of how hockey usually breaks. Minnesota controlled play and chance quality. New Jersey won anyway because Daws was perfect and Minnesota wasn't.

Three Stars

  • D. Mercer (NJD)—2A
  • M. Boldy (MIN)—1G
  • Z. Buium (MIN)—1A
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 22
MIN
1
NJD
4

N. Daws stands tall as the Devils edge the Wild

Chances 4.3 – 3.3Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Wild deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
MIN
4.33
NJD
3.27
57% of the chances43%

The board read MIN 1, NJD 4. The chances read MIN 4.3, NJD 3.3.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NJD
+0.7
goals above expected
NJD3.27 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
MIN4.33 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Wild left 3.3 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 16:21NJDP. Cotter0–1
  2. P2 06:08NJDB. Dillon0–2
  3. P3 04:53NJDA. GritsyukPP0–3
  4. P3 10:37MINM. Boldy1–3
  5. P3 18:43NJDJ. BrattEN1–4
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
MIN
44 shots
1
Final
95 shots
NJD
51 shots
4
MIN attackNJD attack
MIN NJD Goal
44
shots · 1 in
51
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
MINNJD
0 / 9
2.13 xG
High danger
1 / 5
1.26 xG
1 / 14
1.69 xG
Medium
2 / 12
1.23 xG
0 / 45
0.50 xG
Low
1 / 54
0.78 xG

The Wild went 0 for 9 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
N. Daws
+3.3
NJD · 30/31
B
F. Gustavsson
+0.3
MIN · 31/34
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

N. Daws stands tall as the Devils edge the Wild

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–14
  1. 16:21NJDP. Cotter(C. Brown, D. Mercer)0–1
2ndshots 11–11
  1. 06:08NJDB. Dillon(D. Mercer, S. Nemec)0–2
3rdshots 12–10
  1. 04:53NJDA. Gritsyukpower play(T. Meier)0–3
  2. 10:37MINM. Boldy(J. Eriksson Ek, Z. Buium)1–3
  3. 18:43NJDJ. Brattempty net(J. Siegenthaler)1–4

score reads MIN–NJD

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.27
NJD chances
Goals their shots were worth
+0.7
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.042
NJD puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
51.1%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

4.33Expected goals3.27
MIN 57% of the chance quality
31Shots on goal35
9High-danger chances5
68All attempts (Corsi)71
Adjusted for score: MIN 54% · NJD 46%
Faceoffs · NJD won48%off47%neu44%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MIN0 / 9 · 2.13 xG
NJD1 / 5 · 1.26 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MIN1 / 14 · 1.69 xG
NJD2 / 12 · 1.23 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MIN0 / 45 · 0.50 xG
NJD1 / 54 · 0.78 xG

MIN went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.13 expected goals — 2.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MIN
1 G · 4.33 xG · -3.3
NJD
4 G · 3.27 xG · +0.7
012345

MIN finished -3.3 against expected, NJD +0.7.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MIN
WRIST1/24
SNAP0/4
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/7
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/2
OTHER0/24
NJD
WRIST2/22
SNAP2/10
SLAP0/10
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/20
MIN
NJD
Off the rush
1 G on 21
2.19 xG
2 G on 35
2.49 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 8
1.66 xG
0 G on 2
0.25 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 1-for-24, NJD 2-for-22. NJD scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
F. Gustavsson
MIN · 31/34 · .912
+0.3
saved above expected
B
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.3+0.3
Medium2/121.2-0.8
Low1/540.8-0.2

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

N. Daws
NJD · 30/31 · .968
+3.3
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/92.1+2.1
Medium1/141.7+0.7
Low0/450.5+0.5

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

95 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
MIN
44 shots
1
Final
95 shots
NJD
51 shots
4
MIN attackNJD attack
MIN NJD Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — MIN left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Mercer
#91 · C · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:46 on ice · +2
M. Boldy
#12 · L · MIN
1 G · 0 A · 7 SOG · 21:29 on ice
Z. Buium
#8 · D · MIN
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 21:14 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Wed, Oct 22
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 12:38 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model calls this a 2.5-2.5 game with New Jersey at exactly 50% win probability—a genuine coin flip.

Minnesota's 52.0% xG share suggests offensive dominance. New Jersey drives possession at 51.0% Corsi, gaining territorial control. That advantage evaporates in context: the Devils' 0.971 PDO reveals a team running cold on both shooting and saves, a gap that typically regresses hard.

Goaltending adds uncertainty. J. Allen faces a back-to-back, which could prompt a backup start or bring fatigue to an otherwise reliable starter.

The forward matchups decide this game. Timo Meier generates at 1.08 xG/60 to Matt Boldy's 0.89 xG/60, but Boldy converts at 13.7% while Meier checks in at 6.7%—a shooting gap that could flip the advantage. Jack Hughes (18G, 11.5% shooting) converts at an elite rate and will command defensive focus. Robby Fabbri, likely inactive, removes depth for Minnesota.

Both teams expose defensive weaknesses: Matt Kiersted for Minnesota, Johnathan Kovacevic for New Jersey. The winner is whoever exploits that vulnerability first.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NJD 51%
50%
NJD
Model favorite
50%
50%
MIN50NJD

NJD by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score MIN 2.5–2.5 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
MIN← edge
edge →NJD
52.0%50.0%
48.0%51.0%
2.552.45
2.402.50
2.041.66
1.932.23
1.0070.971

MIN holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.007 vs 0.971) says MIN has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
MIN
5-4-1
-4 GD · 2d rest
NJD
6-2-2
+5 GD · 1d rest
1.007
MIN PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Devils drive Corsi at 51.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Devils drive Corsi at 51.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • J. Allen is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
MIN
Expected in goal
F. Gustavsson
2 days rest.958 last start
Backup Filip Gustavsson · +1.4 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NJD
Expected in goal
J. Allen
back-to-back.920 last start
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
MIN
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Robby Fabbri2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Keep going

Where to next