Motion-blurred skater in a Philadelphia Flyers sweater
Breakdown · NYI at PHI

Flyers edge the Islanders in a shootout

The verdict · coin flip

The Flyers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

NYI 3 · PHI 4
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 1:29 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Philadelphia won a shootout it had no business winning on the underlying numbers—expected goals split 3.42–3.55, a slight edge to the Islanders. The difference: ruthless execution in tight.

The Flyers converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%). The Islanders managed 0 of 5. That gap decided the game long before Matvei Michkov buried the shootout winner from the high slot.

Everything else was even. Shot attempts finished 26–26. High-danger chances were 5–5. Both goalies stopped 23 of 26 shots (0.885 SV%). Samuel Ersson posted a +0.55 against expected, which is solid work, but it was Philadelphia's offense that swung the outcome.

Both teams were equally lethal on the rush: the Islanders scored 3 goals on 32 chances, the Flyers 2 on 25. But in the half-dozen moments that mattered most—in the crease and near the net—Philadelphia seized every opportunity. New York couldn't find the back of the net when it counted.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · SO · Oct 25
NYI
3
PHI
4

Flyers edge the Islanders in a shootout

Chances 3.5 – 3.4Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Flyers took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NYI
3.55
PHI
3.42
51% of the chances49%

The board read NYI 3, PHI 4. The chances read NYI 3.5, PHI 3.4.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
PHI
+0.6
goals above expected
PHI3.42 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
NYI3.55 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 09:51NYIS. HolmstromSH1–0
  2. P2 06:15NYIA. Duclair2–0
  3. P2 10:29PHIC. Dvorak2–1
  4. P3 01:54PHIT. Zegras2–2
  5. P3 04:21NYIM. Tsyplakov3–2
  6. P3 07:32PHIT. ZegrasPP3–3
  7. SO 00:00PHIT. ZegrasPP3–3
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYI
48 shots
4
Final
87 shots
PHI
39 shots
5
NYI attackPHI attack
NYI PHI Goal

Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

48
shots · 4 in
39
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYIPHI
0 / 5
0.99 xG
High danger
2 / 5
1.24 xG
2 / 15
1.83 xG
Medium
1 / 15
1.76 xG
1 / 42
0.74 xG
Low
0 / 26
0.41 xG

The Islanders went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B
S. Ersson
+0.6
PHI · 23/26
B
I. Sorokin
+0.4
NYI · 23/26
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Flyers edge the Islanders in a shootout

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 4–8
  1. 09:51NYIS. Holmstromshorthanded(J. Pageau)1–0
2ndshots 13–8
  1. 06:15NYIA. Duclair(M. Warren, A. Lee)2–0
  2. 10:29PHIC. Dvorak(T. Zegras, M. Michkov)2–1
3rdshots 5–9
  1. 01:54PHIT. Zegras(C. Dvorak, J. Drysdale)2–2
  2. 04:21NYIM. Tsyplakov(M. Warren, T. DeAngelo)3–2
  3. 07:32PHIT. Zegraspower play(B. Brink, C. York)3–3
OTshots 4–1no goals
    SO
    1. 00:00PHIT. Zegraspower play3–3
    2. 00:00NYIS. Holmstrompower play3–3
    3. 00:00PHIM. Michkovpower play3–3

    score reads NYI–PHI

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.42
    PHI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.6
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.017
    PHI puck luck
    About 1.000 — a normal night for bounces
    42.6%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.55Expected goals3.42
    NYI 51% of the chance quality
    26Shots on goal26
    5High-danger chances5
    62All attempts (Corsi)46
    Adjusted for score: NYI 55% · PHI 45%
    Faceoffs · PHI won50%off50%neu47%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYI0 / 5 · 0.99 xG
    PHI2 / 5 · 1.24 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYI2 / 15 · 1.83 xG
    PHI1 / 15 · 1.76 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYI1 / 42 · 0.74 xG
    PHI0 / 26 · 0.41 xG

    NYI went 0-for-5 from high danger on 0.99 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYI
    3 G · 3.55 xG · -0.6
    PHI
    4 G · 3.42 xG · +0.6
    012345

    NYI finished -0.6 against expected, PHI +0.6.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYI
    WRIST0/11
    SNAP2/19
    BACKHAND0/5
    TIP IN1/4
    SLAP0/5
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER0/17
    PHI
    WRIST2/23
    SNAP0/5
    BACKHAND1/4
    TIP IN0/3
    SLAP0/1
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/10
    NYI
    PHI
    Off the rush
    3 G on 32
    3.11 xG
    2 G on 25
    2.66 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 1
    0.05 xG
    0 G on 2
    0.34 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-11, PHI 2-for-23. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    I. Sorokin
    NYI · 23/26 · .885
    +0.4
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger2/51.2-0.8
    Medium1/151.8+0.8
    Low0/260.4+0.4

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    S. Ersson
    PHI · 23/26 · .885
    +0.6
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/51.0+1.0
    Medium2/151.8-0.2
    Low1/420.7-0.3

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    87 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYI
    48 shots
    4
    Final
    87 shots
    PHI
    39 shots
    5
    NYI attackPHI attack
    NYI PHI Goal

    Shootout goals are not shots and are not drawn; the scoreboard above counts goals from the shot log.

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYI left, PHI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    T. Zegras
    #46 · C · PHI
    2 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 18:43 on ice · +2
    C. Dvorak
    #22 · C · PHI
    1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 15:59 on ice · +2
    M. Warren
    #41 · D · NYI
    0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 11:20 on ice · +1
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Sat, Oct 25
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 12:58 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.3 to 2.6 goal game favoring Philadelphia, giving the Flyers 55% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

    The underlying advantage belongs to Philadelphia. The Flyers generated 51.0% of expected goals at 5v5 this season while the Islanders managed 48.0%. New York's Corsi splits tighten the gap: 49.0% to Philadelphia's 48.0%, suggesting tighter possession than shot quality implies. On puck luck, the Flyers have benefited from a 1.008 PDO compared to the Islanders' 0.993—a modest edge that compounds over time.

    The tension here is classical: who drives play wins in the long run, but hockey allows for single-game variance. Philadelphia's shot quality edge is real. Whether it translates depends on execution.

    For New York, Anders Lee remains the focal point. He's generating 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes, has scored 9 times with 20 assists, and operates at a 6.4% shooting rate despite just 2 hard-hat goals. That gap suggests regression in either direction. Bo Horvat complements Lee at 0.87 xG/60, with 18 goals and 10 assists on 12.8% shooting, backed by three hard-hat goals that signal genuine finish quality.

    Philadelphia's attack centers on Owen Tippett and Christian Dvorak. Tippett operates at 0.88 xG/60 with 19 goals and 18 assists on 12.1% shooting, including two hard-hat goals. Dvorak, at 0.81 xG/60, has compiled 12 goals and 21 assists on 11.2% shooting, with three hard-hat goals—a more playmaking-oriented profile.

    Defensively, Alexander Romanov is a pressure point the Flyers can exploit. Containing Tippett becomes New York's priority. Philadelphia must convert its underlying edge; Dvorak's defensive limitations matter when possession flips. That fundamental mismatch—shot quality favors Philly, randomness allows New York—is why 55% feels less like a verdict than a reflection of real advantage meeting real uncertainty.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    PHI 55%
    54%
    PHI
    Model favorite
    46%
    54%
    NYI50PHI

    PHI by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.3–2.6 PHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI← edge
    edge →PHI
    48.0%51.0%
    49.0%48.0%
    2.482.26
    2.692.20
    1.781.96
    1.941.82
    0.9931.008

    PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.008) says PHI has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NYI
    5-4-1
    +1 GD · 2d rest
    PHI
    5-4-1
    +2 GD · 2d rest
    0.993
    NYI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.008
    PHI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Flyers own the underlying play — 51.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    Things to watch
    • The Flyers own the underlying play — 51.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYI
    Expected in goal
    D. Rittich
    2 days rest.941 last start
    Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    PHI
    Expected in goal
    D. Vladar
    2 days rest.939 last start
    Backup Dan Vladar · +13.8 GSAx this season

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI
    Anders Lee9G 20A
    1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
    Bo Horvat18G 10A
    0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
    PHI
    Owen Tippett19G 18A
    0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
    Christian Dvorak12G 21A
    0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next