Flyers edge the Islanders in a shootout
The Flyers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.
The underlying story
Philadelphia won a shootout it had no business winning on the underlying numbers—expected goals split 3.42–3.55, a slight edge to the Islanders. The difference: ruthless execution in tight.
The Flyers converted 2 of 5 high-danger chances (40%). The Islanders managed 0 of 5. That gap decided the game long before Matvei Michkov buried the shootout winner from the high slot.
Everything else was even. Shot attempts finished 26–26. High-danger chances were 5–5. Both goalies stopped 23 of 26 shots (0.885 SV%). Samuel Ersson posted a +0.55 against expected, which is solid work, but it was Philadelphia's offense that swung the outcome.
Both teams were equally lethal on the rush: the Islanders scored 3 goals on 32 chances, the Flyers 2 on 25. But in the half-dozen moments that mattered most—in the crease and near the net—Philadelphia seized every opportunity. New York couldn't find the back of the net when it counted.
The danger ladder
NYI went 0-for-5 from high danger on 0.99 expected goals — 1.0 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
NYI finished -0.6 against expected, PHI +0.6 — S. Ersson (PHI) saved 0.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-11, PHI 2-for-23. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- PHI was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
- NYI couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 25 rush chances.
- NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
- S. Ersson was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.