Backcheck
Recap · NJD at LAK

J. Markstrom stands tall as the Devils edge the Kings

The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.01–4.26 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 2:16 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NJD
New Jersey Devils
4
Home
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.01Expected goals4.26
59% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)44
2High-danger chances8
46Corsi (all attempts)94
Score-adjusted: 28% / 72%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Los Angeles controlled the game—59% of expected goals, 67% of shot attempts—and lost 4–1. That's the deal: New Jersey stole this one.

The Kings generated 4.26 expected goals and finished with 1. Eight high-danger chances yielded one goal. New Jersey's 3.01 xG became 4. This wasn't happenstance. This was J. Markstrom's brilliance and Los Angeles's failure to finish.

Markstrom stopped 43 of 44 shots (0.977 save percentage) and posted +3.26 goals saved above expected. D. Kuemper allowed 3 on 21. The gap was not subtle.

New Jersey's chances carried more weight. At 5v5, the Devils generated 0.065 xG per shot; the Kings managed 0.045. New Jersey was lethal on the rush—3 goals on 17 chances—and scored from low-danger areas, spots where opposing goalies are supposed to make saves. Los Angeles created 5 rebound opportunities and converted zero.

D. Mercer scored twice. L. Hughes and B. Dillon each added an assist. The Devils rode depth and a brick wall to a heist.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD1 / 2 · 1.39 xG
LAK1 / 8 · 1.79 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD1 / 10 · 1.14 xG
LAK0 / 15 · 1.49 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD2 / 34 · 0.47 xG
LAK0 / 71 · 0.98 xG

NJD went 2-for-34 from low danger on 0.47 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
4 G · 3.01 xG · +1.0
LAK
1 G · 4.26 xG · -3.3
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. MarkstromNJD
+3.3
D. KuemperLAK
+0.0

NJD finished +1.0 against expected, LAK -3.3 — J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 3.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST3/23
TIP IN1/5
SLAP0/1
SNAP0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/15
LAK
WRIST1/35
TIP IN0/11
SLAP0/8
SNAP0/6
WRAP AROUND0/1
BACKHAND0/2
OTHER0/31
NJD
LAK
Off the rush
3 G on 17 · 1.23 xG
1 G on 22 · 2.09 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.07 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.52 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 3-for-23, LAK 1-for-35. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
D. Mercer
#91 · C · NJD
2 G · 0 A · 3 SOG · 19:05 TOI · +2
L. Hughes
#43 · D · NJD
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 25:43 TOI · +2
B. Dillon
#5 · D · NJD
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 23:01 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NJD stole this one. LAK owned 59% of the xG and lost.
  • LAK had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • J. Markstrom (NJD) stopped 3.3 goals above expected.
  • NJD had the higher quality looks — 0.065 xG/shot vs 0.045.
  • NJD scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 17 rush chances.
  • LAK created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 3.3 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 3.3 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NJD at LAK · 9:00 PM ET

Devils at Kings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:15 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
LAK
Model favorite
46%
54%
NJD50LAK

LAK by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NJD 2.32.6 LAK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NJD← edge
edge →LAK
50.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
51.0%Corsi%52.0%
2.45xGF / 602.42
2.50xGA / 602.20
1.66Goals for / gm1.85
2.23Goals against / gm1.71
0.971PDO — luck, not skill1.002

LAK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.971 vs 1.002) says LAK has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The models see this as a dead heat. New Jersey is projected between 2.3 and 2.6 goals, Los Angeles at 54% win probability—nearly as close to even money as the NHL offers.

The Devils' case: They're the warmer team, 8-2-0 in their last 10. The Kings' case: Five-on-five, the separation is negligible. New Jersey sits at 50.0% xG, Los Angeles at 52.0%; Corsis tell the same story (51.0% vs. 52.0%). This is a choice between two competent ensembles, not a blowout waiting to happen.

New Jersey's PDO of 0.971 means they're running cold—shooting and save percentage both below expectation. Regression math says they're due for a positive swing. Los Angeles, at 1.002, is running hot. Luck tends to flatten out, which gives the Devils a theoretical edge—but that advantage shrinks when you consider Los Angeles's marginal superiority in shot quality.

Both teams face a goaltending complication. D. Kuemper and J. Allen are on back-to-backs, which historically invites either a backup or a tired starter. Neither team can count on a completely fresh stopper.

For New Jersey, Timo Meier is the gravitational center—1.08 xG per 60 minutes, 13 goals, 15 assists, and three high-danger goals despite a modest 6.7% shooting rate. Jack Hughes, at 0.88 xG per 60 and 11.5% shooting on 18 goals and 17 assists, is the other engine; only one of his goals came from high-danger play.

Los Angeles counters with Alex Laferriere, who carries 0.87 xG per 60 with 16 goals, 18 assists, and two high-danger goals at 9.9% shooting. Jared Wright, at 0.83 xG per 60, has four assists and zero goals—a rare player generating chances without finishing.

Defensively, Johnathan Kovacevic is New Jersey's obvious weak point. Adrian Kempe occupies the same role for Los Angeles. In a tight game, depth matters.

This is the rarest thing in hockey: a game the numbers genuinely refuse to call.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters