J. Markstrom stands tall as the Devils edge the Kings
The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.01–4.26 and won anyway.
The underlying story
Los Angeles controlled the game—59% of expected goals, 67% of shot attempts—and lost 4–1. That's the deal: New Jersey stole this one.
The Kings generated 4.26 expected goals and finished with 1. Eight high-danger chances yielded one goal. New Jersey's 3.01 xG became 4. This wasn't happenstance. This was J. Markstrom's brilliance and Los Angeles's failure to finish.
Markstrom stopped 43 of 44 shots (0.977 save percentage) and posted +3.26 goals saved above expected. D. Kuemper allowed 3 on 21. The gap was not subtle.
New Jersey's chances carried more weight. At 5v5, the Devils generated 0.065 xG per shot; the Kings managed 0.045. New Jersey was lethal on the rush—3 goals on 17 chances—and scored from low-danger areas, spots where opposing goalies are supposed to make saves. Los Angeles created 5 rebound opportunities and converted zero.
D. Mercer scored twice. L. Hughes and B. Dillon each added an assist. The Devils rode depth and a brick wall to a heist.
The danger ladder
NJD went 2-for-34 from low danger on 0.47 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
NJD finished +1.0 against expected, LAK -3.3 — J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 3.3 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 3-for-23, LAK 1-for-35. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- NJD stole this one. LAK owned 59% of the xG and lost.
- LAK had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) stopped 3.3 goals above expected.
- NJD had the higher quality looks — 0.065 xG/shot vs 0.045.
- NJD scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 17 rush chances.
- LAK created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- LAK underperformed xG by 3.3 — wasted quality chances.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 3.3 goals above expected — stole the show.