Backcheck
Recap · WPG at SJS

A. Nedeljkovic stands tall as the Sharks edge the Jets

The Sharks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 3:00 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WPG
Winnipeg Jets
1
Home
SJS
San Jose Sharks
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.93Expected goals4.60
54% share for the better side
33Shot attempts (SOG)28
8High-danger chances9
54Corsi (all attempts)69
Score-adjusted: 44% / 56%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Sharks underperformed their expected goals by 2.60 yet won 2-1. Winnipeg underperformed its 3.93 xG by 2.93—a steeper collapse that proved decisive despite near-even underlying metrics.

San Jose held a slight xG edge (4.60–3.93) and more high-danger chances (9–8). Both teams misfired catastrophically: 0/9 for the Sharks, 0/8 for Winnipeg. Neither conversion rate happens often.

A. Nedeljkovic was the difference. He stopped 32 of 33 shots, outperforming expected saves by 2.93 goals—the margin that converts close games into wins. C. Hellebuyck nearly matched him (26/28, +2.60 vs expected), but Winnipeg's offensive drought offset the goaltending excellence.

M. Celebrini drove San Jose with 1 goal and 1 assist in 19:39. P. Kurashev added an assist. J. Morrissey scored for Winnipeg but lacked support.

Execution separated them. The Sharks converted 1 of 3 rebound chances; Winnipeg created 7 and converted none. A. Nedeljkovic's brilliance sealed it.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WPG0 / 8 · 1.99 xG
SJS0 / 9 · 2.23 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WPG0 / 11 · 1.37 xG
SJS2 / 16 · 1.93 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WPG1 / 35 · 0.57 xG
SJS0 / 44 · 0.44 xG

SJS went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.23 expected goals — 2.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WPG
1 G · 3.93 xG · -2.9
SJS
2 G · 4.60 xG · -2.6
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
C. HellebuyckWPG
+2.6
A. NedeljkovicSJS
+2.9

WPG finished -2.9 against expected, SJS -2.6 — A. Nedeljkovic (SJS) saved 2.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WPG
WRIST0/23
SLAP1/7
BACKHAND0/6
TIP IN0/3
SNAP0/2
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/12
SJS
WRIST0/21
SLAP0/7
BACKHAND2/7
TIP IN0/2
SNAP0/2
BAT0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/28
WPG
SJS
Off the rush
0 G on 20 · 1.82 xG
1 G on 30 · 3.49 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 7 · 1.47 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.43 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WPG went 0-for-23, SJS 0-for-21.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Celebrini
#71 · C · SJS
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 19:39 TOI · +2
J. Morrissey
#44 · D · WPG
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 22:31 TOI
P. Kurashev
#96 · C · SJS
0 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 20:10 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • WPG generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
  • C. Hellebuyck (WPG) stopped 2.6 goals above expected.
  • Open game — 17 high-danger chances combined (SJS 9, WPG 8).
  • SJS couldn't convert — 0/9 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • WPG couldn't convert — 0/8 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • SJS created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WPG created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • SJS underperformed xG by 2.6 — wasted quality chances.
  • WPG underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • C. Hellebuyck (WPG) saved 2.6 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • C. Hellebuyck was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 9 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WPG at SJS · 10:00 PM ET

Jets at Sharks: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 2:59 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
SJS
Model favorite
48%
52%
WPG50SJS

SJS by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WPG 2.52.6 SJS; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WPG← edge
edge →SJS
48.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
49.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.34xGF / 602.33
2.55xGA / 602.56
1.90Goals for / gm1.99
2.10Goals against / gm2.32
0.998PDO — luck, not skill0.998

WPG holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.998 vs 0.998) says WPG has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.5 to 2.6 goals per game with the Sharks at 52% win probability—a genuine coin flip. When a projection is this tight, the underlying matchup is balanced to the point of indifference.

At 5v5, both teams generate exactly 48.0% expected goals. Winnipeg's Corsi% sits at 49.0% versus San Jose's 47.0%—a marginal edge in puck possession that doesn't move the needle. Both carry identical 0.998 PDOs, meaning neither benefits from shooting luck or goaltending randomness.

Winnipeg's offense relies on volume from Nino Niederreiter and Kyle Connor. Niederreiter's 0.87 xG/60 and 3 high-danger chances leave room to sustain production, while Connor's 13.0% shooting rate on 25 goals is an outlier regression will flatten. San Jose counters with Pavol Regenda, whose 1.10 xG/60 and 16.1% shooting rate identify him as the matchup's most dangerous scorer, and Igor Chernyshov, whose offensive contributions come with defensive liabilities.

Players to Watch

WPG

  • Nino Niederreiter — 0.87 xG/60, 6G 6A, 3 HD goals, 8.6% shooting
  • Kyle Connor — 0.83 xG/60, 25G 30A, 2 HD goals, 13.0% shooting

SJS

  • Pavol Regenda — 1.10 xG/60, 5G 1A, 2 HD goals, 16.1% shooting
  • Igor Chernyshov — 0.91 xG/60, 6G 8A, 1 HD goal, 15.0% shooting

Both teams operate at 0% for high-danger and rebound scoring—a void neither has exploited. Winnipeg's defense carries Colin Miller as its weak link, while San Jose's perimeter liability is Igor Chernyshov.

Goaltending breaks the tie. Two evenly matched rosters with identical underlying profiles live or die on save percentage. That's where the one-goal-per-game margin comes from.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters