Senators hold off the Mammoth
The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Mammoth should have scored more. Their 3.63 expected goals matched Ottawa's 4.21 closely, but their 2-goal loss did not. The difference was Meriläinen, whose 0.935 save percentage stopped one goal above expected—a 29-of-31 night that equaled Utah's 1.63-goal underperformance.
Ottawa won through precision, not volume. Outshot 31-25, they generated 0.088 expected goals per attempt versus Utah's 0.063, translating that advantage into nine high-danger chances to six. All four Senators goals came on the rush, driven by relentless net-front positioning. Underneath the scoreboard's margin lay a narrow game: Ottawa simply converted better.
Michael Amadio's tip-in from the doorstep at 3:46 of the third period marked the turning point. By then, the Senators had seized control.
The danger ladder
UTA went 0-for-16 from medium danger on 1.67 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
UTA finished -1.6 against expected, OTT -0.2 — L. Meriläinen (OTT) saved 1.6 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 1-for-25, OTT 1-for-17. OTT scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- UTA generated higher-quality looks than the shot total suggests.
- L. Meriläinen (OTT) stopped 1.6 goals above expected.
- Open game — 15 high-danger chances combined (OTT 9, UTA 6).
- OTT generated far more dangerous chances — 0.088 xG/shot vs 0.063. Quality over quantity.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
- OTT created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA underperformed xG by 1.6 — wasted quality chances.
- L. Meriläinen (OTT) saved 1.6 goals above expected — stole the show.