Devils edge the Blackhawks in overtime
The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Devils won despite an embarrassment of riches they couldn't cash: 6 high-danger chances, 0 conversions. Yet New Jersey still beat Chicago 4–3 in overtime, suggesting efficiency elsewhere mattered more than volume in the slot.
The expected goals backed the result. The Devils controlled 58% of 5v5 xG (3.93 to 2.86), indicating genuine superiority in shot quality.
But Chicago kept the volume battle competitive. The Blackhawks held 35% of shot attempts—20 to 37—a workable deficit that meant the game stayed physical and contested. They were also sharp off the rush: 3 goals on 24 chances, an efficiency that nearly carried them through. New Jersey scored 3 on the rush as well, but needed 32 attempts to get there.
Simon Nemec's wrist shot from the high slot ended it at 3:28 of overtime.
Goaltending wasn't decisive. S. Knight was sensational: 33 saves on 37 shots, a 0.892 save percentage. J. Markstrom was solid: 17 for 20, 0.850. Knight was better, and yet New Jersey still took the 2 points. The Devils' precision was the story—they scored when it mattered most, in overtime, after squandering the volume advantage they'd built.
The danger ladder
NJD went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.41 expected goals — 1.4 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
NJD finished +0.1 against expected, CHI +0.1 — J. Markstrom (NJD) allowed 0.1 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 2-for-41, CHI 0-for-16. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- NJD couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- CHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
- NJD created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- S. Knight was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.