Motion-blurred skater in a Philadelphia Flyers sweater
Breakdown · NJD at PHI

Flyers pull away from the Devils

The verdict · coin flip

The Flyers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

NJD 3 · PHI 6
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 5:15 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The 6–3 scoreline suggested a Flyers rout, but expected goals told another story: 3.90–3.96, nearly even, with New Jersey holding the thin edge. Variance, not dominance, decided this game.

Philadelphia held 45% of shot attempts (29–35) while dominating the high-danger count 5–1, yet squeezed only a marginal xG advantage through shot quality—0.081 expected goals per shot versus New Jersey's 0.056. The Flyers overperformed their xG by 2.10 goals; the Devils underperformed by 0.96.

D. Vladar (PHI) was solid in net, saving 32 of 35 and outperforming expectations by 0.96 goals. J. Allen (NJD) paid the price on the other side: 23 of 29 saved, falling 2.10 short. The Flyers' efficiency on the rush—four goals from 33 chances—was where the game turned. New Jersey's power play was sharp: two goals on twelve shots (1.16 xG), yet it wasn't enough to overcome Philadelphia's finishing.

Trevor Zegras's wrist shot from the high slot (P3, 15:21) marked the pivot. The Flyers also converted two low-danger opportunities—the sort of chances Allen should stop. Six goals told a story xG never predicted.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Nov 22
NJD
3
PHI
6

Flyers pull away from the Devils

Chances 4.0 – 3.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

Dead even on chances. The Flyers took it anyway.

Expected goals · chance value
NJD
3.96
PHI
3.90
50% of the chances50%

The board read NJD 3, PHI 6. The chances read NJD 4.0, PHI 3.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
PHI
+2.1
goals above expected
PHI3.90 expected · 6 scored
Expected
Scored
NJD3.96 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

The Flyers scored 2.1 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 07:37NJDT. MeierPP1–0
  2. P1 09:00PHIN. Cates1–1
  3. P1 12:06PHIM. Michkov1–2
  4. P1 12:15PHIT. Foerster1–3
  5. P1 12:32PHIT. Foerster1–4
  6. P2 11:42PHIB. Brink1–5
  7. P2 16:16NJDN. Hischier2–5
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NJD
60 shots
3
Final
104 shots
PHI
44 shots
6
NJD attackPHI attack
NJD PHI Goal
60
shots · 3 in
44
shots · 6 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NJDPHI
0 / 1
0.19 xG
High danger
1 / 5
1.13 xG
3 / 27
3.02 xG
Medium
3 / 19
2.09 xG
0 / 43
0.74 xG
Low
2 / 24
0.67 xG

High-danger looks: NJD 0 of 1, PHI 1 of 5.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
D. Vladar
+1.0
PHI · 32/35
F
J. Allen
−2.1
NJD · 23/29
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Flyers pull away from the Devils

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–10
  1. 07:37NJDT. Meierpower play(J. Bratt, N. Hischier)1–0
  2. 09:00PHIN. Cates1–1
  3. 12:06PHIM. Michkov(S. Couturier)1–2
  4. 12:15PHIT. Foerster(N. Cates, T. Konecny)1–3
  5. 12:32PHIT. Foerster(N. Cates, N. Seeler)1–4
2ndshots 13–10
  1. 11:42PHIB. Brink(S. Couturier)1–5
  2. 16:16NJDN. Hischier(L. Hughes, J. Bratt)2–5
3rdshots 13–9
  1. 13:27NJDN. Hischierpower play(S. Nemec, J. Bratt)3–5
  2. 15:21PHIT. Zegras(O. Tippett, C. Dvorak)3–6

score reads NJD–PHI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.90
PHI chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.1
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.083
PHI puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
40.3%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.96Expected goals3.90
NJD 50% of the chance quality
35Shots on goal29
1High-danger chances5
71All attempts (Corsi)48
Adjusted for score: NJD 66% · PHI 34%
Faceoffs · PHI won47%off42%neu59%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD0 / 1 · 0.19 xG
PHI1 / 5 · 1.13 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD3 / 27 · 3.02 xG
PHI3 / 19 · 2.09 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD0 / 43 · 0.74 xG
PHI2 / 24 · 0.67 xG

PHI went 2-for-24 from low danger on 0.67 expected goals — 1.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
3 G · 3.96 xG · -1.0
PHI
6 G · 3.90 xG · +2.1
01234567

NJD finished -1.0 against expected, PHI +2.1.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
WRIST2/35
SNAP0/6
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/8
SLAP0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/11
PHI
WRIST4/21
SNAP2/16
TIP IN0/4
BACKHAND0/1
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/4
NJD
PHI
Off the rush
2 G on 25
1.54 xG
4 G on 33
3.27 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 10
1.16 xG
1 G on 5
0.48 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NJD went 2-for-35, PHI 4-for-21. PHI scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Allen
NJD · 23/29 · .793
-2.1
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/51.1+0.1
Medium3/192.1-0.9
Low2/240.7-1.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

D. Vladar
PHI · 32/35 · .914
+1.0
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/10.2+0.2
Medium3/273.0+0.0
Low0/430.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

104 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NJD
60 shots
3
Final
104 shots
PHI
44 shots
6
NJD attackPHI attack
NJD PHI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NJD left, PHI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
0 G · 3 A · 6 SOG · 20:50 on ice · +1
N. Hischier
#13 · C · NJD
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 20:11 on ice · +1
N. Cates
#27 · L · PHI
1 G · 2 A · 4 SOG · 16:28 on ice · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Nov 22
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 5:34 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects the Flyers at 53% win probability in a game that splits 2.3–2.5 goals. This is about as close to a pick'em as the market offers.

The Devils' underlying metrics reveal the standoff: they drive possession at 51.0% Corsi but run cold at a PDO of 0.971, primed for positive regression. The Flyers edge in shot quality (51.0% xG%) but operate at a PDO of 1.008 that's already performing to expectation—no margin for mean reversion there.

Form deepens the mystery. New Jersey sits underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10 games, which doesn't square with their territorial edge. A regression-based rebound is plausible; a deeper pattern is not evident.

Goaltending introduces an unforced wildcard. D. Vladar faces a back-to-back start, as does J. Allen. Either could yield a tired starter or a backup—a lottery ticket in a game this tight.

Timo Meier generates 1.08 xG per 60 with 13 goals and 3 high-danger goals at a 6.7% shooting rate, signaling his volume is backed by quality. Jack Hughes operates at 0.88 xG/60 with 18 goals at 11.5% shooting, well above his underlying rate. Owen Tippett mirrors Hughes at 0.88 xG/60 with 19 goals and 2 high-danger goals at 12.1% shooting. Both are outperforming their chances, which is a key variable in a game this tight.

Christian Dvorak (0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 3 high-danger goals) anchors Philadelphia's depth and compounds New Jersey's defensive vulnerabilities. Johnathan Kovacevic is flagged as New Jersey's weak link. Both teams sit at 0% on high-danger and rebound goal rates—a statistical impossibility that suggests either sample noise or rigid structural suppression of those attack avenues.

Players to Watch

  • Timo Meier (NJD): 1.08 xG/60, 13 goals, 3 high-danger goals, 6.7% shooting
  • Jack Hughes (NJD): 0.88 xG/60, 18 goals, 11.5% shooting
  • Owen Tippett (PHI): 0.88 xG/60, 19 goals, 2 high-danger goals, 12.1% shooting
  • Christian Dvorak (PHI): 0.81 xG/60, 12 goals, 3 high-danger goals, 11.2% shooting

When possession metrics converge, form fractures, and goaltending randomizes, the model's 53% nod to the Flyers is a coin flip. Neither team has built separation.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

PHI 53%
53%
PHI
Model favorite
47%
53%
NJD50PHI

PHI by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NJD 2.3–2.5 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NJD← edge
edge →PHI
50.0%51.0%
51.0%48.0%
2.452.26
2.502.20
1.661.96
2.231.82
0.9711.008

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.971 vs 1.008) says PHI has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NJD
5-4-1
-5 GD · 1d rest
PHI
5-3-2
-2 GD · 1d rest
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.008
PHI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Devils drive Corsi at 51.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • The Devils drive Corsi at 51.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • D. Vladar is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • J. Allen is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Devils are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NJD
Expected in goal
J. Allen
back-to-back.958 last start
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

PHI
Expected in goal
D. Vladar
back-to-back.931 last start
Backup Dan Vladar · +13.8 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Keep going

Where to next