Backcheck
Recap · PHI at NYI

Flyers steal one from the Islanders against the run of play

The Flyers stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.67–4.25 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 5:58 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
4
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.67Expected goals4.25
61% share for the better side
21Shot attempts (SOG)31
4High-danger chances4
43Corsi (all attempts)72
Score-adjusted: 34% / 66%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders dominated expected goals—61% at 5v5—and controlled 60% of shot attempts. The Flyers won anyway, 4-3 in a shootout. This was a heist.

S. Ersson stopped 28 of 31 shots for Philadelphia, exceeding his expected output by 1.25 goals. When a goalie plays that far above expectation in a one-goal win, he is the difference. D. Rittich made 18 saves for New York at an 0.857 save percentage.

The underlying play was never close. New York commanded 4.25 expected goals to Philadelphia's 2.67. High-danger chances split evenly at 4-4, but the Islanders' advantage lived in volume—they generated danger consistently; the Flyers converted theirs in clutch moments, including Travis Konecny's wrist shot from the slot in the shootout.

Both teams found success on the rush, but with different efficiency. New York scored 3 goals on 40 rush attempts; Philadelphia scored 2 on 18. For the Flyers to steal a win, they needed their goalie to be extraordinary and their finishes to land. They delivered both.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI0 / 4 · 0.92 xG
NYI0 / 4 · 0.87 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI1 / 10 · 1.26 xG
NYI3 / 30 · 2.85 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI2 / 29 · 0.49 xG
NYI0 / 38 · 0.53 xG

PHI went 2-for-29 from low danger on 0.49 expected goals — 1.5 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
4 G · 2.67 xG · +1.3
NYI
3 G · 4.25 xG · -1.3
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. ErssonPHI
+1.2
D. RittichNYI
-0.3

PHI finished +1.3 against expected, NYI -1.3 — S. Ersson (PHI) saved 1.2 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST2/15
SNAP1/6
TIP IN0/1
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/3
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/13
NYI
WRIST1/31
SNAP1/4
TIP IN0/7
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/1
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED1/1
WRAP AROUND0/2
OTHER0/20
PHI
NYI
Off the rush
2 G on 18 · 1.71 xG
3 G on 40 · 3.37 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2 · 0.44 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.17 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 2-for-15, NYI 1-for-31. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 28:53 TOI · +1
M. Shabanov
#49 · R · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:19 TOI
R. Pulock
#6 · D · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 20:45 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI stole this one. NYI owned 61% of the xG and lost.
  • S. Ersson (PHI) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
  • PHI scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 40 rush chances.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at NYI · 4:00 PM ET

Flyers at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 5:56 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
PHI
Model favorite
50%
50%
PHI50NYI

PHI by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.52.5 NYI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →NYI
51.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.48
2.20xGA / 602.69
1.96Goals for / gm1.78
1.82Goals against / gm1.94
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.993

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.993) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.5–2.5 with the Flyers at 50% win probability. A genuine coin flip.

Philadelphia generates more scoring chances: 51.0% expected goals at 5v5 against New York's 48.0%. New York counters with shot volume: a 49.0% Corsi to 48.0%. The PDO gap—Philadelphia 1.008, New York 0.993—tells the true story. The Flyers are cashing chances faster than sustainable; the Islanders are leaving money on the table.

Owen Tippett anchors Philadelphia's offense. Nineteen goals, 18 assists, 0.88 xG per 60, shooting at 12.1%. That shooting percentage sits well above the league average—the Flyers are both creating and finishing at elite rates. Christian Dvorak compounds the problem with 12 goals, 21 assists, 0.81 xG/60, and 11.2% shooting. The gap in Dvorak's defensive reliability makes him New York's primary target.

Anders Lee is the Islanders' most prolific chance-creator: 1.20 xG per 60, the highest rate in this matchup. Yet he has only 9 goals and 20 assists on 6.4% shooting. That gap between expected output and actual output is where regression lives. Bo Horvat (18G, 10A, 0.87 xG/60) provides secondary attack volume.

Goaltending uncertainty clouds everything. I. Sorokin plays on a back-to-back and may not get the start. D. Vladar faces the same back-to-back fatigue. Expect either a backup or an exhausted starter in this one.

Alexander Romanov emerges as New York's defensive weak point. That defensive asymmetry—combined with Philadelphia's shot efficiency—should favor the Flyers on paper. The model calling it even money suggests the Islanders' volume edge is real enough to balance it out.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters