Blue Jackets hold off the Devils
The Blue Jackets stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.51–4.20 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Blue Jackets beat the Devils 5–3, but the underlying numbers said the Devils deserved better. New Jersey held 57% of shot attempts (33–25) and led expected goals 4.20–3.51, yet left with nothing.
The gap was purely goaltending. E. Merzlikins stopped 30 of 33 shots and beat his xG model by 1.20 goals; J. Allen faced just 25 shots but gave up 1.49 more than expected, a split that swung nearly three goals in Columbus's favor.
The Devils were lethal in transition, scoring 3 times on 31 rush chances. The Blue Jackets matched them, scoring 4 times on just 21 rush attempts—an efficiency advantage that turned the tide. New Jersey's power play was dominant (2 goals on 23 shots, 1.48 xG), but it could not overcome the even-strength margin.
C. Coyle (1–2 in 20:27) and Z. Werenski (2 assists in 26:57) led Columbus's offense. Miles Wood's wrist shot from the high slot in period three (13:31) marked the turning point. N. Hischier (1–1 in 23:51) led New Jersey's charge.
This was a game where shot quality mattered less than shot conversion. The Devils created the better chances; the Blue Jackets simply scored more of theirs.
The danger ladder
CBJ went 4-for-10 from medium danger on 1.23 expected goals — 2.8 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
CBJ finished +1.5 against expected, NJD -1.2 — J. Allen (NJD) allowed 1.5 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 2-for-19, NJD 2-for-18. CBJ scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- E. Merzlikins (CBJ) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- J. Allen (NJD) gave up 1.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 31 rush chances.
- CBJ was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
- NJD created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NJD power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 23 PP shots (1.48 xG).