Backcheck
Recap · COL at PHI

Avalanche hold off the Flyers

The Avalanche won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:19 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.83Expected goals3.02
52% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)25
3High-danger chances6
67Corsi (all attempts)58
Score-adjusted: 51% / 50%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado weathered a metrics disadvantage where the Flyers generated better chances but finished with fewer goals. Philadelphia produced 3.02 expected goals to 2.83, drew 6 high-danger chances to 3, yet lost 3-2.

M. Blackwood's performance was decisive. The Colorado goaltender posted a 0.920 save percentage and stopped 1.02 goals above expected, converting the team's discipline into results. S. Ersson's 0.893 save percentage told the inverse story—he surrendered two low-danger tallies the metrics never predicted.

Both teams found the rush equally. Philadelphia scored 2 goals on 26 chances; Colorado matched it on 27 attempts. Where they diverged: the Flyers crashed the net and created 4 rebound opportunities (zero conversions), while Colorado generated 5 rebounds and buried 1.

Travis Konecny's wrist shot from the doorstep (P2, 05:58) proved the inflection point. The Avalanche held on from there.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
COL1 / 3 · 0.78 xG
PHI1 / 6 · 1.45 xG
Medium dangermid-range
COL0 / 13 · 1.28 xG
PHI1 / 11 · 1.19 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
COL2 / 51 · 0.77 xG
PHI0 / 41 · 0.38 xG

COL went 0-for-13 from medium danger on 1.28 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
COL
3 G · 2.83 xG · +0.2
PHI
2 G · 3.02 xG · -1.0
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
M. BlackwoodCOL
+1.0
S. ErssonPHI
-0.2

COL finished +0.2 against expected, PHI -1.0 — M. Blackwood (COL) saved 1.0 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
COL
WRIST1/23
SNAP2/12
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/22
PHI
WRIST1/33
SNAP0/0
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/0
TIP IN1/3
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/19
COL
PHI
Off the rush
2 G on 27 · 1.46 xG
2 G on 26 · 2.09 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5 · 1.05 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.71 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: COL went 1-for-23, PHI 1-for-33. COL scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
C. Makar
#8 · D · COL
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 25:51 TOI · +1
N. MacKinnon
#29 · C · COL
0 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 22:53 TOI
E. Andrae
#36 · D · PHI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 21:59 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • M. Blackwood (COL) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
  • COL scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • PHI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • COL created 5 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · COL at PHI · 1:00 PM ET

Avalanche at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:18 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
COL
Model favorite
54%
46%
COL50PHI

COL by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score COL 2.62.4 PHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

COL← edge
edge →PHI
57.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
57.0%Corsi%48.0%
3.03xGF / 602.26
2.30xGA / 602.20
2.63Goals for / gm1.96
1.56Goals against / gm1.82
1.021PDO — luck, not skill1.008

COL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.021 vs 1.008) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Colorado carries 54% win probability in this matchup. The model projects 2.6–2.4, pick'em tilted Avalanche. Genuinely close.

The Avalanche control the play. At 5v5, they post 57.0% expected goals and 57.0% shot attempts while Philadelphia sits at 51.0% and 48.0%. That gap runs Colorado's direction—territory, pace, and shot quality all favoring the Avalanche.

But Colorado's PDO of 1.021 reveals overperformance. They're converting at a rate regression will pull down. Philadelphia's 1.008 hovers near neutral.

The rest advantage cuts the other way. Philadelphia arrives on three days' rest; Colorado on one. Watch whether M. Blackwood starts or Colorado turns to a backup.

Artturi Lehkonen drives Colorado's attack at 1.11 expected goals per 60, posting 18 goals, 22 assists, and six high-danger goals. He's shooting at 14.9%, well above Ross Colton, who generates at the same rate (1.10 xG/60) but has scored only seven goals on 4.9%. That gap will eventually close.

Philadelphia counters with Owen Tippett, running 0.88 xG per 60 on 19 goals and 18 assists with two high-danger markers. Christian Dvorak operates at slightly lower volume (0.81 xG per 60) but has posted 12 goals, 21 assists, and three high-danger chances. His goal total will drift toward his creation rate.

The analytics favor Colorado. The rest edge and goaltending variance pull the other way. That tension is what makes this close.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters