Backcheck
Recap · VGK at PHI

Golden Knights edge the Flyers in overtime

The Golden Knights earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 7:58 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
VGK
Vegas Golden Knights
3
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.09Expected goals2.50
55% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)19
5High-danger chances5
48Corsi (all attempts)49
Score-adjusted: 49% / 51%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The 3-2 scoreline flattered the Flyers. Golden Knights held 55% of 5v5 expected goals (3.09–2.50), commanding play across every phase and converting their chances while the Flyers did not.

Both teams faced five high-danger looks. Golden Knights buried theirs; the Flyers managed zero conversions, a rarity that underscores their struggle. A. Schmid (VGK) was immaculate on high-danger attempts, stopping all five at 100%.

The turning point came at 02:47 of overtime when M. Stone's wrist shot from the doorstep ended it. Yet regulation decided the game through execution. Each team scored twice on the rush — Flyers on 21 chances, Golden Knights on 22 — but Golden Knights' execution mattered. Flyers couldn't convert a single high-danger look despite crashing the net. Golden Knights converted one of four rebound chances; Flyers converted zero of three.

The goaltending gap reflected the underlying play: A. Schmid (VGK) made 17 saves on 19 shots (0.895 SV%), while D. Vladar (PHI) stopped 19 of 22 (0.864 SV%).

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VGK1 / 5 · 1.09 xG
PHI0 / 5 · 1.11 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VGK2 / 13 · 1.50 xG
PHI2 / 10 · 1.01 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VGK0 / 30 · 0.51 xG
PHI0 / 34 · 0.37 xG

PHI went 0-for-5 from high danger on 1.11 expected goals — 1.1 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VGK
3 G · 3.09 xG · -0.1
PHI
2 G · 2.50 xG · -0.5
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. SchmidVGK
+0.5
D. VladarPHI
+0.1

VGK finished -0.1 against expected, PHI -0.5 — A. Schmid (VGK) saved 0.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VGK
WRIST2/22
SNAP0/5
BACKHAND1/5
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/1
OTHER0/13
PHI
WRIST0/16
SNAP1/10
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP1/2
TIP IN0/1
OTHER0/17
VGK
PHI
Off the rush
2 G on 22 · 2.17 xG
2 G on 21 · 1.61 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.48 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.72 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 2-for-22, PHI 0-for-16. VGK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Eichel
#9 · C · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 19:23 TOI · +1
M. Stone
#61 · R · VGK
2 G · 0 A · 5 SOG · 18:57 TOI · +1
C. Dvorak
#22 · C · PHI
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 17:33 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • PHI couldn't convert — 0/5 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • VGK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • PHI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • VGK created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • A. Schmid was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 5 high-danger shots.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · VGK at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

Golden Knights at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 7:57 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
VGK
Model favorite
51%
49%
VGK50PHI

VGK by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score VGK 2.42.3 PHI; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

VGK← edge
edge →PHI
54.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
52.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.52xGF / 602.26
2.11xGA / 602.20
2.12Goals for / gm1.96
2.10Goals against / gm1.82
0.983PDO — luck, not skill1.008

VGK holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.983 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The numbers say flip a coin. A predictive model projects Vegas to win 2.4–2.3, giving the Golden Knights a 51% win probability—essentially even money in a league that rarely deals them out this evenly.

Vegas owns the underlying play. The Golden Knights generate 54.0% of expected goals at 5v5 compared to Philadelphia's 51.0%, and control shot attempts at 52.0% Corsi. They should tilt the ice. Yet the Flyers' PDO of 1.008 sits comfortably above neutral while Vegas runs cold at 0.983—a gap that typically reverts. If Vegas shoots at league average instead of its current depth, this game shifts.

The tension is real. Vegas drives possession. Philadelphia converts chances at an unusual rate. The back-to-back schedule clouds both crease situations: D. Vladar faces fatigue, and C. Hart enters the second leg of a doubleheader. Either could fold, or both could hold.

Watch Brandon Saad for Vegas. He's generating 0.91 xG per 60 minutes and sits at 4.1% shooting—a player running cold but dangerous, with 3 goals and 6 assists on that volume. Tomas Hertl works at 0.88 xG/60 and has converted at 4.3%, totaling 5 goals and 17 assists. Both create, but neither has finished at his ceiling. Saad is marked inactive for this game, which shifts emphasis to Hertl.

Owen Tippett leads Philly's charge. At 0.88 xG/60—identical to Hertl's volume—Tippett converts at 12.1%, a number that explains his 19 goals on middling shot production. Christian Dvorak spins at 0.81 xG/60 but finishes at 11.2%, yielding 12 goals and 21 assists. Both Philadelphia forwards operate at the conversion rate Vegas is leaving on the table.

The tactical foundation: Vegas generates more chances but buries fewer. Philadelphia takes what it gets and scores. Rasmus Andersson anchors Vegas's defensive weakness; the Flyers' corresponding exposure runs through Dvorak. Both teams register 0% of their goals from high-danger situations and off the rush, suggesting possession-based scoring and few scrambles late.

The model nailed this one. True toss-up, separated by depth, fatigue, and whether cold shooting regresses or sustained performance keeps pace.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters