Backcheck
Recap · LAK at DAL

C. DeSmith stands tall as the Stars edge the Kings

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 11, 8:31 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
LAK
Los Angeles Kings
1
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.53Expected goals4.01
53% share for the better side
28Shot attempts (SOG)26
5High-danger chances7
62Corsi (all attempts)52
Score-adjusted: 55% / 45%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Dallas rolled past Los Angeles 4-1 in a game expected goals called nearly even—4.01 to 3.53, a 53-47 split that looks absurd next to a three-goal final margin. The gap tells you everything: C. DeSmith's brilliance and the Kings' inability to finish.

DeSmith recorded a 0.964 save percentage on 28 shots, stopping 2.53 goals above expected. A. Forsberg went 17 for 20 (0.850 SV%) for Los Angeles before D. Kuemper replaced him and allowed nothing on five attempts.

Dallas generated sharper chances—7 high-danger opportunities to Los Angeles' 5—and converted with precision. The Stars finished at 0.077 expected goals per shot attempt versus the Kings' 0.057; not just more volume, but better quality. Off the rush, Dallas scored 3 goals on 24 chances, a rate that punishes slow transitions. Los Angeles underperformed their xG by 2.53, possession metrics that translate to wasted chances.

Wyatt Johnston's snap shot from the wing at 19:28 of the third broke open a tight contest. Once Dallas extended the lead, the Kings had no answer.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
LAK1 / 5 · 1.24 xG
DAL1 / 7 · 2.15 xG
Medium dangermid-range
LAK0 / 15 · 1.74 xG
DAL3 / 13 · 1.38 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
LAK0 / 42 · 0.55 xG
DAL0 / 32 · 0.48 xG

LAK went 0-for-15 from medium danger on 1.74 expected goals — 1.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
LAK
1 G · 3.53 xG · -2.5
DAL
4 G · 4.01 xG · -0.0
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. ForsbergLAK
+0.2
D. KuemperLAK
+0.8
C. DeSmithDAL
+2.5

LAK finished -2.5 against expected, DAL -0.0 — C. DeSmith (DAL) saved 2.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
LAK
SNAP1/29
SLAP0/6
WRIST0/2
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/18
DAL
SNAP3/21
SLAP0/3
WRIST0/4
BACKHAND0/3
TIP IN1/3
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/1
OTHER0/16
LAK
DAL
Off the rush
1 G on 21 · 2.09 xG
3 G on 24 · 2.54 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 0.96 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.66 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: LAK went 1-for-29, DAL 3-for-21. DAL scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Rantanen
#96 · R · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 19:34 TOI · +2
W. Johnston
#53 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 16:59 TOI · +3
M. Duchene
#95 · C · DAL
1 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 14:13 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • C. DeSmith (DAL) stopped 2.5 goals above expected.
  • DAL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.077 xG/shot vs 0.057. Quality over quantity.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
  • DAL created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • LAK underperformed xG by 2.5 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Kuemper (LAK) saved 4.0 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • C. DeSmith (DAL) saved 2.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · LAK at DAL · 8:00 PM ET

Kings at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 8:30 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
DAL
Model favorite
49%
51%
LAK50DAL

DAL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score LAK 2.42.4 DAL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

LAK← edge
edge →DAL
52.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
52.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.42xGF / 602.36
2.20xGA / 602.29
1.85Goals for / gm2.07
1.71Goals against / gm1.68
1.002PDO — luck, not skill1.024

LAK holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.002 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4–2.4 draw with Dallas favored at 51% — functionally a pick'em. A few edges matter.

Los Angeles owns territorial dominance. The Kings post a 52.0% Corsi%, controlling puck possession decisively. That surfaces in expected goals too: 52.0% xG% over 5v5 play. But Dallas's 51.0% xG% sits close enough that skill dominates variance here.

Dallas is running hot. The Stars' 1.024 PDO ranks well above sustainable; expect some negative regression as luck normalizes. Los Angeles's 1.002 PDO sits closer to neutral. That matters for which team's results will compress closer to its talent level as this series unfolds.

Both goalies face back-to-back situations. J. Oettinger and D. Kuemper could see backup appearances, or tired starters might play through fatigue. Either way, expect something less than peak performance from at least one crease.

The performers:

Alex Laferriere drives Los Angeles's offense. He's produced 16G 18A at a 0.87 xG/60 clip, with 2 high-danger goals and a 9.9% shooting percentage — high enough to sustain some luck. Jared Wright (0G 4A, 0.83 xG/60) has generated chances but hasn't found the back of the net; he's shooting 0.0%.

Jason Robertson anchors Dallas. At 0.96 xG/60, he's the most dangerous forward on the ice: 25G 21A with 2 high-danger goals and a 12.4% shooting rate. Michael Bunting (8G 14A, 0.83 xG/60) sits at 7.6% shooting — room to run hot, or regression waiting to happen.

Los Angeles leaks defensively through Adrian Kempe. Dallas's structural weakness runs through Tyler Myers. Both defenses sit at 0% high-danger goal rate and 0% rebound conversion—essentially even on cleanup play.

The model is right. This is as close to an even matchup as the data permits. Territorial edge to Los Angeles, luck favoring Dallas, goaltending in flux: pick your poison.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

LAK
Alex Laferriere16G 18A
0.87 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.9% sh
Jared Wright0G 4A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 0.0% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters