Kings pull away from the Ducks
The Kings earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Kings beat the Ducks 6-1, a scoreline that obscures a close underlying battle—expected goals split 3.54 to 2.99 in Los Angeles's favor. Goaltending decided the gap: A. Forsberg posted a 0.962 save percentage (+1.99 vs. expected), while L. Dostal managed 0.800 (−2.46).
The Kings controlled play without overwhelming it. Shot attempts favored Los Angeles 54 to 46 percent (30–26 on goal). High-danger chances split 4–3. Yet Los Angeles scored four goals on 33 rush attempts, the kind of efficiency that turns marginal puck possession into blowouts. Anaheim squandered its quality chances, underperforming their expected goals by 2.0 to Los Angeles's +2.5.
A. Laferriere led the Kings' attack with three goals in 16:24, including a slap shot from the top of the circles. A. Kopitar added three assists in 17:38. B. Dumoulin contributed two assists across 20:57 of ice time.
The 6-1 margin masked a three-shot differential that barely qualified as a rout. Goaltending and finishing—not dominance—made the difference.
The danger ladder
LAK went 4-for-18 from medium danger on 1.84 expected goals — 2.2 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
ANA finished -2.0 against expected, LAK +2.5 — L. Dostal (ANA) allowed 2.5 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: ANA went 1-for-24, LAK 0-for-25. LAK scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- A. Forsberg (LAK) stopped 2.0 goals above expected.
- L. Dostal (ANA) gave up 2.5 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- LAK was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 33 rush chances.
- ANA created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- LAK outperformed their expected goals by 2.5 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- ANA underperformed xG by 2.0 — wasted quality chances.
- A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 2.0 goals above expected — stole the show.