Canucks steal one from the Kraken against the run of play
The Canucks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.32–4.42 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Canucks stole one in a shootout. The Kraken owned 66% of expected goals — 4.42 to 2.32 — and still fell short. This was a heist.
Seattle controlled the game by every conventional metric: 39–24 in shot attempts, 7–2 in high-danger chances. But volume didn't translate. K. Lankinen, the Vancouver goaltender, stopped 37 of 39 shots at a 0.949 save percentage, recording +2.42 against expected. That margin — two full goals above the expected line — swallowed the Kraken's advantage.
The gap wasn't random. Seattle generated far more dangerous chances, averaging 0.070 xG per shot versus 0.036 for Vancouver. The Kraken underperformed their xG by 2.42 goals, a symptom of wasted quality. They scored 2 goals on 30 rush attempts, the kind of rush conversion rate that usually owns games, then converted zero on 4 rebound opportunities. Vancouver created 5 rebounds and converted the same: nothing. Possession became irrelevant.
J. Daccord (SEA) faced a lighter workload, stopping 22 of 24, but worked against a defense that generated leaner scoring chances.
Liam Ohgren's wrist shot from the slot in the shootout decided the match. E. Pettersson (VAN) had scored in regulation. V. Dunn and J. Eberle (SEA) both assisted. But Vancouver got the final word when it mattered.
The danger ladder
SEA went 1-for-25 from medium danger on 2.50 expected goals — 1.5 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
VAN finished +0.7 against expected, SEA -2.4 — K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 2.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: VAN went 1-for-32, SEA 1-for-25. SEA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- VAN stole this one. SEA owned 66% of the xG and lost.
- K. Lankinen (VAN) stopped 2.4 goals above expected.
- SEA generated far more dangerous chances — 0.070 xG/shot vs 0.036. Quality over quantity.
- SEA was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 30 rush chances.
- SEA created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- VAN created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- SEA underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
- K. Lankinen (VAN) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.