Motion-blurred skater in a Nashville Predators sweater
Breakdown · NSH at VGK

Predators hold off the Golden Knights

The verdict · stolen

The Predators stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.17–4.42 and won anyway.

NSH 4 · VGK 2
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:58 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Vegas dominated the expected-goal battle, 4.42–3.17 (58% of the xG), and lost 4–2. That's the whole story.

The margin lay in goaltending. Vegas commanded 62% of shot attempts (31–19) and matched Nashville on high-danger chances (6–6). But J. Annunen saved 2.42 goals above expected while A. Schmid surrendered 0.83—a swing that erased Vegas's advantages.

Michael Bunting's tip-in at 11:52 of the second period was the inflection point. Nashville converted from low-danger areas and thrived on the rush (3 goals on 24 chances), a directness that Vegas couldn't match. Vegas created five rebound opportunities and converted zero.

The power play accelerated Nashville's lead: 2 goals on 11 shots with 0.80 xG. Vegas controlled the volume—possession, shot attempts, expected goals—but J. Annunen's 0.935 save percentage rendered it moot.

A. Schmid was flawless on high-danger attempts (6-for-6) but bled four goals from the perimeter. Vegas dominated on paper yet lost to the goaltender across the line.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 31
NSH
4
VGK
2

Predators hold off the Golden Knights

Chances 3.2 – 4.4Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Golden Knights deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
NSH
3.17
VGK
4.42
42% of the chances58%

The board read NSH 4, VGK 2. The chances read NSH 3.2, VGK 4.4.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NSH
+0.8
goals above expected
NSH3.17 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
VGK4.42 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Golden Knights left 2.4 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:35VGKM. StonePP0–1
  2. P1 09:06VGKB. Hutton0–2
  3. P1 11:20NSHN. Perbix1–2
  4. P1 15:37NSHS. StamkosPP2–2
  5. P1 16:21NSHR. Schaefer3–2
  6. P2 11:52NSHM. BuntingPP4–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NSH
35 shots
4
Final
83 shots
VGK
48 shots
2
NSH attackVGK attack
NSH VGK Goal
35
shots · 4 in
48
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NSHVGK
0 / 6
1.78 xG
High danger
1 / 6
1.64 xG
1 / 9
0.90 xG
Medium
1 / 19
2.09 xG
3 / 33
0.50 xG
Low
0 / 44
0.69 xG

High-danger looks: NSH 0 of 6, VGK 1 of 6.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
J. Annunen
+2.4
NSH · 29/31
D-
A. Schmid
−0.8
VGK · 15/19
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Predators hold off the Golden Knights

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–9
  1. 05:35VGKM. Stonepower play(P. Dorofeyev, N. Hanifin)0–1
  2. 09:06VGKB. Hutton(T. Hertl, P. Dorofeyev)0–2
  3. 11:20NSHN. Perbix(L. Evangelista)1–2
  4. 15:37NSHS. Stamkospower play(F. Forsberg, L. Evangelista)2–2
  5. 16:21NSHR. Schaefer(B. Skjei, M. McCarron)3–2
2ndshots 6–4
  1. 11:52NSHM. Buntingpower play(N. Blankenburg, E. Haula)4–2
3rdshots 3–18no goals

    score reads NSH–VGK

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.17
    NSH chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.8
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.054
    NSH puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    41.0%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.17Expected goals4.42
    VGK 58% of the chance quality
    19Shots on goal31
    6High-danger chances6
    48All attempts (Corsi)69
    Adjusted for score: NSH 37% · VGK 63%
    Faceoffs · VGK won71%off20%neu50%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NSH0 / 6 · 1.78 xG
    VGK1 / 6 · 1.64 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NSH1 / 9 · 0.90 xG
    VGK1 / 19 · 2.09 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NSH3 / 33 · 0.50 xG
    VGK0 / 44 · 0.69 xG

    NSH went 3-for-33 from low danger on 0.50 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NSH
    4 G · 3.17 xG · +0.8
    VGK
    2 G · 4.42 xG · -2.4
    012345

    NSH finished +0.8 against expected, VGK -2.4.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NSH
    WRIST2/21
    TIP IN1/6
    SNAP1/5
    BACKHAND0/1
    SLAP0/1
    BETWEEN LEGS0/1
    OTHER0/13
    VGK
    WRIST0/32
    TIP IN2/6
    SNAP0/4
    BACKHAND0/3
    SLAP0/3
    BETWEEN LEGS0/0
    OTHER0/21
    NSH
    VGK
    Off the rush
    3 G on 24
    1.80 xG
    1 G on 27
    2.54 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 2
    0.45 xG
    0 G on 5
    0.77 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: NSH went 2-for-21, VGK 0-for-32. NSH scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    J. Annunen
    NSH · 29/31 · .935
    +2.4
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/61.6+0.6
    Medium1/192.1+1.1
    Low0/440.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    A. Schmid
    VGK · 15/19 · .789
    -0.8
    saved above expected
    D-
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger0/61.8+1.8
    Medium1/90.9-0.1
    Low3/330.5-2.5

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    83 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NSH
    35 shots
    4
    Final
    83 shots
    VGK
    48 shots
    2
    NSH attackVGK attack
    NSH VGK Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NSH left, VGK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    P. Dorofeyev
    #16 · R · VGK
    0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:36 on ice · +1
    L. Evangelista
    #77 · R · NSH
    0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 17:19 on ice · +1
    N. Hanifin
    #15 · D · VGK
    0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 29:59 on ice
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Wed, Dec 31
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:30 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    Vegas holds the structural advantage. The model projects a 2.3-2.7 Golden Knights victory with 57% win probability, anchored on 54.0% 5v5 xG versus Nashville's 49.0%. The 52.0% to 50.0% Corsi edge reinforces the picture: Vegas controls the play at consistent margins.

    The complication is PDO. Vegas runs 0.983, sitting cold below Nashville's 0.992. That gap suggests positive regression is due—if underlying play stays stable but luck normalizes, the projected margin tightens considerably.

    For Nashville, the dangerous pieces remain clear. Zachary L'Heureux carries 0.85 xG/60 with 4G at 16.0% shooting—a cluster of volatility that suggests upside. Filip Forsberg (0.80 xG/60, 23G 17A) drives elite volume at 13.6% shooting, materially below his expected rate. He's underperforming his chances in a major way.

    Vegas counters with two undershooting elite-volume threats. Brandon Saad (0.91 xG/60, 3G 6A) sits at 4.1% shooting; Tomas Hertl (0.88 xG/60, 5G 17A) at 4.3%. Both are efficiency-bound waiting for positive regression—and both carry the volume to hit hard when it comes.

    Nashville's defensive weak link is Jonathan Marchessault; Vegas exposes Rasmus Andersson. The Golden Knights project to control this, but PDO regression could tighten the finish.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    VGK 57%
    57%
    VGK
    Model favorite
    43%
    57%
    NSH50VGK

    VGK by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NSH 2.3–2.7 VGK; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NSH← edge
    edge →VGK
    49.0%54.0%
    50.0%52.0%
    2.482.52
    2.582.11
    1.842.12
    2.212.10
    0.9920.983

    VGK holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.992 vs 0.983) says NSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NSH
    7-3-0
    +8 GD · 1d rest
    VGK
    4-3-3
    -2 GD · 1d rest
    0.992
    NSH PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    0.983
    VGK PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 49.0%.
    Regression watch
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Things to watch
    • The Golden Knights own the underlying play — 54.0% 5v5 xG vs 49.0%.
    • The Golden Knights' PDO is 0.983 — running cold, due for positive regression.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NSH
    Expected in goal
    J. Saros
    back-to-back.903 last start
    Backup Juuse Saros · -9.3 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    VGK
    Expected in goal
    —
    no game on file

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NSH
    Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
    0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
    Filip Forsberg23G 17A
    0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
    VGK
    Brandon Saad3G 6A
    0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
    Tomas Hertl5G 17A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next