Motion-blurred skater in a New Jersey Devils sweater
Breakdown · NJD at CBJ

Devils steal one from the Blue Jackets against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.21–5.01 and won anyway.

NJD 3 · CBJ 2
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:36 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

New Jersey beat Columbus 3–2 despite losing the xG battle 5.01–3.21. Columbus controlled 61% of the expected goals—this was a theft.

The Blue Jackets dominated the metrics across the board. They held 52% of shot attempts (35–33), created six high-danger chances to New Jersey's four, and generated the scoring opportunities that should have won them this game. Yet they left empty-handed, undone by both misfortune and precision from the opposite end.

Columbus underperformed their xG by 3.01 goals. That is the margin of defeat in a game where they were the better team. J. Greaves made 30 of 33 saves (0.909 SV%), a respectable outing that masked his team's execution in front of the net.

J. Allen was the difference. The New Jersey netminder stopped 33 of 35 shots (0.943 SV%), posting a +3.01 performance against expected goals. Against the run of play, he was exceptional.

The turning point crystallized early in the third. L. Hughes unleashed a snap shot from the high slot at 4:45—the kind of chance that rarely beats a hot goalie, but this time it did. That goal shifted momentum in a game Columbus should have controlled.

New Jersey capitalized on transition. The Devils scored three goals on 27 rush chances, converting movement into results. Columbus generated nine rebound opportunities versus five for New Jersey, but converting twice was not enough against such superior shot creation.

This was not a matter of luck. Columbus simply did not bury their chances, and Allen elevated to steal a win his team had no right to take.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Dec 31
NJD
3
CBJ
2

Devils steal one from the Blue Jackets against the run of play

Chances 3.2 – 5.0Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Blue Jackets deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
NJD
3.21
CBJ
5.01
39% of the chances61%

The board read NJD 3, CBJ 2. The chances read NJD 3.2, CBJ 5.0.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NJD
−0.2
goals above expected
NJD3.21 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
CBJ5.01 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

The Blue Jackets left 3.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 06:18CBJM. Marchment0–1
  2. P2 13:41CBJC. Coyle0–2
  3. P3 02:49NJDN. HischierPP1–2
  4. P3 03:44NJDA. Gritsyuk2–2
  5. P3 04:45NJDL. Hughes3–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NJD
43 shots
3
Final
101 shots
CBJ
58 shots
2
NJD attackCBJ attack
NJD CBJ Goal
43
shots · 3 in
58
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NJDCBJ
0 / 4
1.48 xG
High danger
1 / 6
1.56 xG
2 / 10
0.98 xG
Medium
1 / 22
2.58 xG
1 / 40
0.74 xG
Low
0 / 45
0.87 xG

High-danger looks: NJD 0 of 4, CBJ 1 of 6.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Allen
+3.0
NJD · 33/35
C
J. Greaves
+0.2
CBJ · 30/33
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Devils steal one from the Blue Jackets against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–10
  1. 06:18CBJM. Marchment(K. Marchenko, D. Mayo)0–1
2ndshots 12–18
  1. 13:41CBJC. Coyle(B. Jenner, C. Sillinger)0–2
3rdshots 11–7
  1. 02:49NJDN. Hischierpower play(L. Hughes, J. Hughes)1–2
  2. 03:44NJDA. Gritsyuk(T. Meier, J. Siegenthaler)2–2
  3. 04:45NJDL. Hughes(C. Brown, O. Palat)3–2

score reads NJD–CBJ

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
3.21
NJD chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.2
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.028
NJD puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
42.5%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.21Expected goals5.01
CBJ 61% of the chance quality
33Shots on goal35
4High-danger chances6
54All attempts (Corsi)73
Adjusted for score: NJD 44% · CBJ 56%
Faceoffs · CBJ won57%off47%neu45%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NJD0 / 4 · 1.48 xG
CBJ1 / 6 · 1.56 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NJD2 / 10 · 0.98 xG
CBJ1 / 22 · 2.58 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NJD1 / 40 · 0.74 xG
CBJ0 / 45 · 0.87 xG

CBJ went 1-for-22 from medium danger on 2.58 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NJD
3 G · 3.21 xG · -0.2
CBJ
2 G · 5.01 xG · -3.0
0123456

NJD finished -0.2 against expected, CBJ -3.0.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NJD
SNAP3/31
WRIST0/2
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
CBJ
SNAP1/22
WRIST1/15
BACKHAND0/9
SLAP0/8
TIP IN0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/15
NJD
CBJ
Off the rush
3 G on 27
1.93 xG
0 G on 30
3.05 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5
0.68 xG
2 G on 9
1.26 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NJD went 3-for-31, CBJ 1-for-22. NJD scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Allen
NJD · 33/35 · .943
+3.0
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/61.6+0.6
Medium1/222.6+1.6
Low0/450.9+0.9

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Greaves
CBJ · 30/33 · .909
+0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/41.5+1.5
Medium2/101.0-1.0
Low1/400.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

101 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NJD
43 shots
3
Final
101 shots
CBJ
58 shots
2
NJD attackCBJ attack
NJD CBJ Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NJD left, CBJ right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
L. Hughes
#43 · D · NJD
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 21:27 on ice
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
0 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 25:11 on ice · -1
J. Siegenthaler
#71 · D · NJD
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 22:58 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Wed, Dec 31
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 11, 10:34 PMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.4–2.7 goal range with the Blue Jackets at 54% win probability—about as close to a pick'em as you'll find. Neither team has earned separation.

Both are underwater. Columbus sits -5 in goal differential over its last 10 games; New Jersey at -6.

At 5v5, the underlying numbers are locked. The Devils own 50.0% expected goals and 51.0% Corsi; the Blue Jackets 52.0% xG% and matching 51.0% Corsi. New Jersey's PDO of 0.971 shows it's running cold—a team due for positive regression. Columbus's 1.003 PDO is the inverse: a team that's gotten lucky. One will revert.

The Devils hold a structural advantage: three days of rest versus Columbus's one. J. Greaves may see a backup in goal, or a tired starter.

Timo Meier carries New Jersey's offense at 1.08 expected goals per 60 minutes, with 13 goals and 15 assists. His 6.7% shooting rate is suppressed—room for regression upward. Jack Hughes, at 0.88 xG/60, owns 18 goals and 17 assists on an 11.5% clip, closer to sustainable. For Columbus, Boone Jenner leads at 0.98 xG/60 with 11 goals and 21 assists, but his 9.6% shooting suggests he's been unlucky. Mathieu Olivier adds 0.89 xG/60, 12 goals, and 9 assists on 13.3% shooting—the healthier rate.

Neither team is generating secondary scoring. Both sit at 0% high-danger and rebound goal rates. New Jersey's defensive liability is Johnathan Kovacevic; Columbus's is Conor Garland. The team that breaks through first on its star power likely wins.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

CBJ 54%
54%
CBJ
Model favorite
46%
54%
NJD50CBJ

CBJ by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NJD 2.4–2.7 CBJ; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NJD← edge
edge →CBJ
50.0%52.0%
51.0%51.0%
2.452.63
2.502.43
1.662.12
2.231.98
0.9711.003

CBJ holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.971 vs 1.003) says CBJ has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NJD
4-5-1
-6 GD · 3d rest
CBJ
4-6-0
-5 GD · 1d rest
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.003
CBJ PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • J. Greaves is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Blue Jackets are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Devils are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
  • The Devils have 2 more days of rest.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NJD
Expected in goal
J. Allen
3 days rest.879 last start
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

CBJ
Expected in goal
J. Greaves
back-to-back.964 last start
Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
Keep going

Where to next