J. Markstrom stands tall as the Devils edge the Mammoth
The Devils stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.72–3.39 and won anyway.
The underlying story
The Devils won 4-1. The underlying numbers didn't. Expected goals split 3.72–3.39, favoring Utah — the sort of edge that typically translates to the scoreboard. J. Markstrom changed the equation. The Devils' goaltender stopped 30 of 31 shots (0.968 SV%) and saved 2.72 goals above expected, stealing a win the xG metrics suggested Utah had earned.
K. Vejmelka went the other way, making 26 of 30 saves (0.867 SV%, -0.61 vs expected). Utah generated 3.72 expected goals on 31 shot attempts but scored one—a 2.72-goal gap they couldn't close. The Devils, by contrast, scraped together 3.39 xG on 30 shots but buried four, including three from low-danger spots that ordinarily don't find the back of the net.
The imbalance traces to discipline in specific phases. The Devils ran 26 rush chances and buried two. Utah crashed effectively for rebounds, generating four, but couldn't convert any. The Devils held 49% of shot attempts and bent that advantage into high-danger looks, outscoring Utah 5–4 on chances from the prime area. The night pivoted on Michael Carcone's wrist shot from the high slot (12:35, third period).
The danger ladder
NJD went 3-for-30 from low danger on 0.54 expected goals — 2.5 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
UTA finished -2.7 against expected, NJD +0.6 — J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 2.7 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: UTA went 1-for-24, NJD 2-for-20. NJD scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) stopped 2.7 goals above expected.
- NJD scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
- UTA created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- UTA underperformed xG by 2.7 — wasted quality chances.
- J. Markstrom (NJD) saved 2.7 goals above expected — stole the show.