Backcheck
Recap · NYI at NSH

J. Saros stands tall as the Predators edge the Islanders

The Predators won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJul 12, 12:47 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
1
Home
NSH
Nashville Predators
2
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.76Expected goals3.92
51% share for the better side
31Shot attempts (SOG)27
7High-danger chances7
59Corsi (all attempts)71
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders generated nearly as much scoring chance as the Predators—3.76 expected goals to 3.92—yet underperformed that output by 2.76 goals. That magnitude of futility, even in a close expected goals contest, should have decided the game decisively. Nashville won 2-1 in a shootout, but the true story was two teams that squandered their chances and two goalies who rose to meet the moment.

J. Saros saved 30 of 31 shots for a 0.968 save percentage, running 2.76 goals better than expected. D. Rittich matched him with 26 of 27 saves, a 0.963 save percentage, and a 2.92 over-expectation. The Preds built their advantage through efficiency: 27 shots on goal yielded 3.92 expected goals, while the Islanders needed 31 shots to reach 3.76.

Both teams created scoring opportunities they couldn't finish. The Islanders crashed the net effectively, earning three rebound chances and matching Nashville 7-7 on high-danger attempts. The Predators went scoreless on all seven high-danger chances, which won't happen often. Both played finesse where they needed force.

Filip Forsberg decided the shootout with a backhander from the slot—the kind of moment that feels inevitable in hindsight but requires both execution and luck. By regulation, he'd been peripheral; in the decisive instant, he delivered.

  • #13 M. Barzal (NYI) — 1A in 24:51
  • #90 R. O'Reilly (NSH) — 1G in 23:52
  • #24 S. Mayfield (NYI) — 1A in 17:01
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI1 / 7 · 1.62 xG
NSH0 / 7 · 1.77 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI0 / 14 · 1.55 xG
NSH1 / 14 · 1.60 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 38 · 0.59 xG
NSH0 / 50 · 0.55 xG

NSH went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.77 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
1 G · 3.76 xG · -2.8
NSH
2 G · 3.92 xG · -1.9
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. RittichNYI
+2.9
J. SarosNSH
+2.8

NYI finished -2.8 against expected, NSH -1.9 — D. Rittich (NYI) saved 2.9 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST1/23
SNAP0/10
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/17
NSH
WRIST1/27
SNAP0/2
SLAP0/9
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND0/4
WRAP AROUND0/0
BAT0/0
OTHER0/24
NYI
NSH
Off the rush
1 G on 27 · 2.95 xG
1 G on 27 · 2.93 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.40 xG
0 G on 2 · 0.48 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 1-for-23, NSH 1-for-27.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 24:51 TOI
R. O'Reilly
#90 · C · NSH
1 G · 0 A · 1 SOG · 23:52 TOI
S. Mayfield
#24 · D · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 17:01 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • D. Rittich (NYI) stopped 2.9 goals above expected.
  • NSH couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NYI created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NSH underperformed xG by 2.9 — wasted quality chances.
  • NYI underperformed xG by 2.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • D. Rittich (NYI) saved 2.9 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • D. Rittich was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
  • J. Saros (NSH) saved 2.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at NSH · 8:00 PM ET

Islanders at Predators: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 11:55 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
NSH
Model favorite
47%
53%
NYI50NSH

NSH by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.52.7 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →NSH
48.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
49.0%Corsi%50.0%
2.48xGF / 602.48
2.69xGA / 602.58
1.78Goals for / gm1.84
1.94Goals against / gm2.21
0.993PDO — luck, not skill0.992

NSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 0.992) says NYI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a NYI 2.5-2.7 NSH game with the Predators at 53% win probability. This is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The 5v5 advantage belongs to Nashville. The Predators own 49.0% xG and 50.0% Corsi compared to the Islanders' 48.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi. Neither team has squeezed much efficiency gain from their possession—both sport near-identical PDO (NSH 0.992, NYI 0.993), meaning luck hasn't tilted either way yet.

Both goalies arrive fatigued. J. Saros and I. Sorokin are each on back-to-backs, raising the odds of a backup start or a tired starter who struggles to locate his rhythm in close situations.

The Islanders' offensive punch centers on Anders Lee and Bo Horvat. Lee has generated 1.20 xG/60 and reached 9G 20A with 2 high-danger goals and a 6.4% shooting rate. Horvat sits at 0.87 xG/60 with 18G 10A, three high-danger markers, and a 12.8% shooting clip that suggests he's converting above his underlying volume. Neutralizing Lee becomes Nashville's defensive priority; how well the Predators execute that assignment may decide the game.

Nashville counters with Filip Forsberg and Zachary L'Heureux. Forsberg has buried 23G on 13.6% shooting and logged 4 high-danger goals alongside 0.80 xG/60—he's punching well above his shot volume. L'Heureux carries 0.85 xG/60 and a startling 16.0% shooting rate across just 4 goals, suggesting regression risk or hot-hand variance. Either way, both are primed to threaten a tired Islanders defense.

The tactical vulnerability for each team lies along the blue line. Alexander Romanov represents NYI's defensive weak link. Jonathan Marchessault fills that role for the Predators. A team that can exploit these gaps—and punish sloppy entries—holds the edge.

Neither offense has found a high-danger or rebound-goal advantage; both sit at 0% in those categories. This will be decided by first-chance efficiency and puck management, not volume. With both starters gassed and both defenses exposed, the winner may simply be whoever executes cleaner hockey in the third period.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters