Motion-blurred skater in a New York Islanders sweater
Breakdown · NYI at MIN

Islanders steal one from the Wild against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.25–5.23 and won anyway.

NYI 4 · MIN 3
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 12:15 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Minnesota's 62% share of expected goals (5.23–3.25) should have won this game. Instead, New York stole it 4–3 in overtime—a disparity so wide it suggests the scoreboard got lost on the way to the rink.

The Wild dominated possession and shot quality. They controlled 56% of shot attempts (36–28), generated nine high-danger chances against four, and averaged 0.080 xG per shot; the Islanders managed just 0.054. Minnesota's depth of play—their ability to create genuine scoring opportunities from every angle—was substantially better than the scoreline suggests.

But the game was decided by variance: I. Sorokin stopped 33 of 36 shots with a save percentage 2.23 goals better than expected, while F. Gustavsson faced 27 shots and allowed three more than his xG model predicted. When one goaltender steals two-plus goals and the other surrenders them, analytics loses.

The turning point was Simon Holmstrom's backhander from the slot at 1:34 of overtime. It wasn't the result of sustained pressure or a series of high-danger setups—it was the kind of goal that comes when a team plays worse but stays dangerous enough to capitalize when the moment arrives.

Q. Hughes recorded three assists in 30:37 for the Wild, orchestrating much of their possession dominance. S. Holmstrom finished with two goals and an assist for the Islanders, the second-line catalyst who doesn't pile up shot attempts the way Minnesota does but shows up when the moment matters. T. DeAngelo (2A in 17:55) anchored the Islanders' blue line.

This was New York's game to lose and Minnesota's game to fail to win—a reversal so complete it will haunt Minnesota's film review.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Jan 10
NYI
4
MIN
3

Islanders steal one from the Wild against the run of play

Chances 3.3 – 5.2Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Wild deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
NYI
3.25
MIN
5.23
38% of the chances62%

The board read NYI 4, MIN 3. The chances read NYI 3.3, MIN 5.2.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYI
+0.8
goals above expected
NYI3.25 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
MIN5.23 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

The Wild left 2.2 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 02:51MINB. Jones0–1
  2. P1 04:18NYIJ. Pageau1–1
  3. P1 15:25MINM. BoldyPP1–2
  4. P2 01:29NYIS. Holmstrom2–2
  5. P2 08:26MINK. Kaprizov2–3
  6. P2 19:34NYIC. CizikasSH3–3
  7. OT 01:34NYIS. Holmstrom4–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYI
45 shots
4
Final
99 shots
MIN
54 shots
3
NYI attackMIN attack
NYI MIN Goal
45
shots · 4 in
54
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYIMIN
1 / 4
1.03 xG
High danger
1 / 9
2.24 xG
2 / 12
1.46 xG
Medium
2 / 19
2.30 xG
1 / 44
0.76 xG
Low
0 / 37
0.70 xG

High-danger looks: NYI 1 of 4, MIN 1 of 9.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
I. Sorokin
+2.2
NYI · 33/36
B
F. Gustavsson
+0.3
MIN · 24/27
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Islanders steal one from the Wild against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–11
  1. 02:51MINB. Jones(B. Faber, Q. Hughes)0–1
  2. 04:18NYIJ. Pageau1–1
  3. 15:25MINM. Boldypower play(Q. Hughes, M. Zuccarello)1–2
2ndshots 11–8
  1. 01:29NYIS. Holmstrom(T. DeAngelo)2–2
  2. 08:26MINK. Kaprizov(D. Hunt, Q. Hughes)2–3
  3. 19:34NYIC. Cizikasshorthanded(S. Holmstrom)3–3
3rdshots 8–17no goals
    OTshots 2–0
    1. 01:34NYIS. Holmstrom(T. DeAngelo, J. Drouin)4–3

    score reads NYI–MIN

    Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
    Process vs result

    The numbers

    XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
    3.25
    NYI chances
    Goals their shots were worth
    +0.8
    Finishing
    Goals above what those chances were worth
    1.020
    NYI puck luck
    Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
    48.0%
    Shot attempts
    Under half — they were outshot
    Split by club

    Who controlled the game

    3.25Expected goals5.23
    MIN 62% of the chance quality
    28Shots on goal36
    4High-danger chances9
    60All attempts (Corsi)65
    Adjusted for score: NYI 49% · MIN 51%
    Faceoffs · MIN won41%off33%neu50%def
    Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
    How the game was won

    The danger ladder

    shotsgoalsexpected
    High dangerslot & crease
    NYI1 / 4 · 1.03 xG
    MIN1 / 9 · 2.24 xG
    Medium dangermid-range
    NYI2 / 12 · 1.46 xG
    MIN2 / 19 · 2.30 xG
    Low dangerperimeter & point
    NYI1 / 44 · 0.76 xG
    MIN0 / 37 · 0.70 xG

    MIN went 1-for-9 from high danger on 2.24 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
    The luck layer

    Finishing vs expected

    expectedactual
    NYI
    4 G · 3.25 xG · +0.8
    MIN
    3 G · 5.23 xG · -2.2
    0123456

    NYI finished +0.8 against expected, MIN -2.2.

    Source · Backcheck xG model
    Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
    What they shot — and what went in

    Shot diet

    goalsshots
    NYI
    WRIST0/28
    BACKHAND2/5
    SNAP1/4
    TIP IN0/4
    SLAP0/2
    WRAP AROUND0/1
    OTHER1/16
    MIN
    WRIST0/30
    BACKHAND0/7
    SNAP1/6
    TIP IN1/6
    SLAP1/5
    WRAP AROUND0/0
    OTHER0/11
    NYI
    MIN
    Off the rush
    3 G on 29
    2.19 xG
    3 G on 35
    3.61 xG
    Off rebounds
    0 G on 4
    0.51 xG
    0 G on 3
    0.58 xG

    Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-28, MIN 0-for-30. NYI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

    Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
    New to these numbers?

    Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

    The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

    xG
    Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
    HD
    High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
    Corsi
    Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
    Adj.
    Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
    GSAx
    Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
    PDO
    Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
    Shot by shot

    In the net

    Graded on goals saved above expected
    I. Sorokin
    NYI · 33/36 · .917
    +2.2
    saved above expected
    A
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/92.2+1.2
    Medium2/192.3+0.3
    Low0/370.7+0.7

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    F. Gustavsson
    MIN · 24/27 · .889
    +0.3
    saved above expected
    B
    the night
    By dangerG/attxGsaved
    High danger1/41.0+0.0
    Medium2/121.5-0.5
    Low1/440.8-0.2

    A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

    99 shots · press play to watch the game back

    Where the shots came from

    NHL play-by-play coordinates
    NYI
    45 shots
    4
    Final
    99 shots
    MIN
    54 shots
    3
    NYI attackMIN attack
    NYI MIN Goal

    Each club shoots toward its own end — NYI left, MIN right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

    Ranked from the box score

    Three stars

    Points first
    Three stars · computed, not voted
    Q. Hughes
    #43 · D · MIN
    0 G · 3 A · 8 SOG · 30:37 on ice
    S. Holmstrom
    #10 · R · NYI
    2 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 17:40 on ice · +3
    T. DeAngelo
    #77 · D · NYI
    0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 17:55 on ice · +2
    Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
    What the model said beforehand

    Before the game

    Written Sat, Jan 10
    Open the pre-game read
    Written from the numbers

    The read

    Edited for clarity
    ◆ By the ModelJul 12, 12:12 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

    The model projects a 2.4 to 2.8 goal game, giving Minnesota a 55% win probability. That edge rests on concrete underlying advantages.

    Minnesota owns the even-strength play. The Wild generate 52.0% expected goals to the Islanders' 48.0%, a gap that builds through 60 minutes. Shot volume tells a different story—New York's Corsi sits at 49.0% to Minnesota's 48.0%—but quality matters more. Neither team's PDO suggests luck is doing the work; the Islanders sit at 0.993 while the Wild check in at 1.007.

    Both goalies face back-to-back starts. J. Wallstedt guards Minnesota's net while D. Rittich handles New York's crease. Watch for tired play or a backup appearance.

    The matchup hinges on star power. Anders Lee leads New York's offense at 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes, posting 9 goals, 20 assists, 2 high-danger goals, and a 6.4% shooting rate. Bo Horvat adds another layer at 0.87 expected goals per 60 with 18 goals, 10 assists, 3 high-danger goals, and a 12.8% shooting clip.

    Minnesota counters with Matt Boldy generating 0.89 expected goals per 60 while tallying 22 goals, 18 assists, 5 high-danger goals, and a 13.7% shooting rate. Robby Fabbri profiles at 0.88 expected goals per 60 with 2 goals, 3 assists, 1 high-danger goal, and a 6.9% shooting clip, though watch for a likely absence.

    New York's Alexander Romanov and Minnesota's Matt Kiersted represent defensive weak links. The Wild's advantage in underlying play—52.0% to 48.0%—suggests they'll create the cleaner scoring chances where matchups and goaltending determine the outcome.

    What the model said beforehand

    The model's lean

    MIN 55%
    55%
    MIN
    Model favorite
    45%
    55%
    NYI50MIN

    MIN by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.4–2.8 MIN; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

    Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
    Season rates · 5v5

    Tale of the tape

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI← edge
    edge →MIN
    48.0%52.0%
    49.0%48.0%
    2.482.55
    2.692.40
    1.782.04
    1.941.93
    0.9931.007

    MIN holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.007) says MIN has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

    Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
    Form · Last 10
    NYI
    5-3-2
    +2 GD · 1d rest
    MIN
    5-2-3
    +2 GD · 1d rest
    0.993
    NYI PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    1.007
    MIN PDO
    Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
    What decides it

    Keys to the game

    Where the edges live
    • The Wild own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    Things to watch
    • The Wild own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
    • J. Wallstedt is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    • D. Rittich is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
    Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

    Lineups

    NHL box score
    NYI
    Expected in goal
    D. Rittich
    back-to-back.963 last start
    Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    MIN
    Expected in goal
    J. Wallstedt
    back-to-back.929 last start
    Backup Filip Gustavsson · +1.4 GSAx this season
    Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

    No completed game on file for this club yet.

    Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

    Computed danger · scouting

    Players to watch

    NHL stats API · our xG
    NYI
    Anders Lee9G 20A
    1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
    Bo Horvat18G 10A
    0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
    MIN
    Matt Boldy22G 18A
    0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
    Robby Fabbri2G 3A
    0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
    Keep going

    Where to next