Motion-blurred skater in a Seattle Kraken sweater
Breakdown · NYI at SEA

Kraken pull away from the Islanders

The verdict · earned

The Kraken earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYI 1 · SEA 4
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 2:02 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Islanders generated 3.26 expected goals and scored one, a 2.26-goal underperformance in the 4-1 loss. That gap, not the scoreboard, tells the story.

Seattle dominated through shot quality. Both teams took 25 attempts, but the Kraken's chances were nearly twice as efficient: 0.100 expected goals per shot versus 0.054 for New York. The gap defined the game. It showed up in the count: 60% of expected goals went to Seattle (4.89–3.26), along with 9 high-danger chances to 3 for the Islanders.

The Kraken converted their speed into goals. They scored 3 times off 24 rush attempts, turning the most dangerous scoring chances into results. New York generated 4 rebound opportunities and finished with none.

P. Grubauer's 24-of-25 performance (+2.26 versus expected) made the result decisive. I. Sorokin was nearly as excellent, saving 1.89 goals above expected, but even elite goaltending couldn't overcome the quality gap.

Jared McCann's wrist shot from the slot at 16:32 of the third marked the turning point. By then, Seattle's control of chance quality had already decided the outcome.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Jan 21
NYI
1
SEA
4

Kraken pull away from the Islanders

Chances 3.3 – 4.9Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Kraken earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NYI
3.26
SEA
4.89
40% of the chances60%

The board read NYI 1, SEA 4. The chances read NYI 3.3, SEA 4.9.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
SEA
−0.9
goals above expected
SEA4.89 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
NYI3.26 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Islanders left 2.3 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 02:38NYIA. DuclairPP1–0
  2. P1 10:40SEAM. BeniersPP1–1
  3. P2 13:37SEAV. Dunn1–2
  4. P2 16:28SEAK. Kakko1–3
  5. P3 16:32SEAJ. McCannEN1–4
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYI
42 shots
1
Final
85 shots
SEA
43 shots
4
NYI attackSEA attack
NYI SEA Goal
42
shots · 1 in
43
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYISEA
0 / 3
0.78 xG
High danger
1 / 9
2.83 xG
0 / 17
1.86 xG
Medium
2 / 14
1.47 xG
1 / 40
0.61 xG
Low
1 / 26
0.59 xG

The Islanders went 0 for 3 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A
P. Grubauer
+2.3
SEA · 24/25
A
I. Sorokin
+1.9
NYI · 21/24
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Kraken pull away from the Islanders

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–10
  1. 02:38NYIA. Duclairpower play(C. Ritchie, M. Barzal)1–0
  2. 10:40SEAM. Benierspower play(V. Dunn, J. McCann)1–1
2ndshots 11–12
  1. 13:37SEAV. Dunn(R. Winterton, B. Meyers)1–2
  2. 16:28SEAK. Kakko(J. Schwartz)1–3
3rdshots 5–3
  1. 16:32SEAJ. McCannempty net(B. Montour, P. Grubauer)1–4

score reads NYI–SEA

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
4.89
SEA chances
Goals their shots were worth
−0.9
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.065
SEA puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
45.0%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.26Expected goals4.89
SEA 60% of the chance quality
25Shots on goal25
3High-danger chances9
60All attempts (Corsi)49
Adjusted for score: NYI 56% · SEA 44%
Faceoffs · SEA won60%off39%neu61%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI0 / 3 · 0.78 xG
SEA1 / 9 · 2.83 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI0 / 17 · 1.86 xG
SEA2 / 14 · 1.47 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI1 / 40 · 0.61 xG
SEA1 / 26 · 0.59 xG

NYI went 0-for-17 from medium danger on 1.86 expected goals — 1.9 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
1 G · 3.26 xG · -2.3
SEA
4 G · 4.89 xG · -0.9
0123456

NYI finished -2.3 against expected, SEA -0.9.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST0/19
SNAP1/11
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/7
SLAP0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/18
SEA
WRIST3/23
SNAP0/7
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/5
DEFLECTED0/0
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/6
NYI
SEA
Off the rush
1 G on 31
2.66 xG
3 G on 24
2.21 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4
0.52 xG
0 G on 3
0.37 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 0-for-19, SEA 3-for-23. SEA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
I. Sorokin
NYI · 21/24 · .875
+1.9
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/92.8+1.8
Medium2/141.5-0.5
Low1/260.6-0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

P. Grubauer
SEA · 24/25 · .960
+2.3
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/30.8+0.8
Medium0/171.9+1.9
Low1/400.6-0.4

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

85 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NYI
42 shots
1
Final
85 shots
SEA
43 shots
4
NYI attackSEA attack
NYI SEA Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NYI left, SEA right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
V. Dunn
#29 · D · SEA
1 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 18:28 on ice · +1
J. McCann
#19 · L · SEA
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 15:37 on ice · +1
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 19:29 on ice · -3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Wed, Jan 21
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 2:00 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.5-2.5 game with Seattle at 51% win probability. This is as close to a coin flip as modern analytics gets.

Possession metrics favor New York slightly. The Islanders control play at 49.0% Corsi, compared to Seattle's 45.0%. Expected goals lean the same way—NYI at 48.0% xG to the Kraken's 46.0%. But Seattle's PDO of 1.011 against New York's 0.993 suggests the Kraken have been outscoring their chances, while the Islanders have undershot theirs. That luck reverses.

The goaltending variable cuts hard here. I. Sorokin is on a back-to-back, which could mean a backup start or a tired first option. Either way, Seattle faces uncertainty in net depth.

Anders Lee anchors the Islanders' top line with 1.20 xG/60—elite volume from inside the dots. His 2 high-danger goals on 9 total speak to clean finishing; his 6.4% shooting rate is sustainable. Bo Horvat sits below Lee in volume (0.87 xG/60) but punches harder when it matters: 3 high-danger goals on 18 total, with a ridiculous 12.8% shooting rate. Seattle's defensive weak link is Chandler Stephenson. New York will hunt him.

For Seattle, Shane Wright and Berkly Catton carry the offensive load. Wright generates 0.77 xG/60 and has buried 4 high-danger chances on just 8 goals—a 10.4% shot rate that won't hold, but his cleanup ability is real. Catton's 0.68 xG/60 masks a 5-on-6 high-danger goal rate and 8.8% shooting efficiency—he's scoring from the spots that matter. Alexander Romanov is New York's defensive weak link—Seattle should target him when they gain the zone.

The tightness of the model holds: slight territorial edge to the Islanders, slight shooting-luck advantage to the Kraken, and goaltending a toss-up. This genuinely could go either way.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

SEA 51%
51%
SEA
Model favorite
49%
51%
NYI50SEA

SEA by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYI 2.5–2.5 SEA; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NYI← edge
edge →SEA
48.0%46.0%
49.0%45.0%
2.482.13
2.692.51
1.781.87
1.941.95
0.9931.011

NYI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.993 vs 1.011) says SEA has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NYI
6-3-1
+5 GD · 1d rest
SEA
4-4-2
-1 GD · 2d rest
0.993
NYI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.011
SEA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Islanders drive Corsi at 49.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Things to watch
  • The Islanders drive Corsi at 49.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • I. Sorokin is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NYI
Expected in goal
I. Sorokin
back-to-back.906 last start
Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

SEA
Expected in goal
J. Daccord
2 days rest.839 last start
Backup Joey Daccord · -6.2 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next