Golden Knights pull away from the Maple Leafs
The Golden Knights earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Golden Knights beat the Maple Leafs 6–3, but the scoreboard understated their dominance. Vegas overperformed their expected goals by 2.43—evidence of clinical finishing that turned an already-favorable position into a rout.
VGK controlled 58% of 5v5 expected goals (3.57–2.63). Their shot quality exceeded Toronto's: 0.071 expected goals per shot versus 0.049. In high-danger chances, Vegas converted 2 of 5, while Toronto managed 1.
A. Stolarz faced 30 shots and conceded 1.4 more goals than expected. A. Hill stopped 18 of 21 (0.857 SV%). Toronto couldn't generate volume—they held 40% of shot attempts (21–31)—or convert their limited opportunities.
Toronto scored 2 goals on 29 rush chances. Vegas, though, went 3 for 27 on the rush and converted 1 of 4 rebound opportunities. M. Stone scored twice and added 1 assist in 18:19, including a wrist shot from the wing at 19:01 of the third.
The danger ladder
VGK went 3-for-13 from medium danger on 1.37 expected goals — 1.6 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
VGK finished +2.4 against expected, TOR +0.4 — A. Stolarz (TOR) allowed 1.4 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 5-for-27, TOR 0-for-18. VGK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- A. Stolarz (TOR) gave up 1.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- VGK had the higher quality looks — 0.071 xG/shot vs 0.049.
- VGK was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
- TOR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
- VGK was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 27 rush chances.
- VGK created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- VGK outperformed their expected goals by 2.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.