Backcheck
Recap · VGK at TOR

Golden Knights pull away from the Maple Leafs

The Golden Knights earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:38 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
VGK
Vegas Golden Knights
6
Home
TOR
Toronto Maple Leafs
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.57Expected goals2.63
58% share for the better side
31Shot attempts (SOG)21
5High-danger chances1
50Corsi (all attempts)54
Score-adjusted: 42% / 58%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Golden Knights beat the Maple Leafs 6–3, but the scoreboard understated their dominance. Vegas overperformed their expected goals by 2.43—evidence of clinical finishing that turned an already-favorable position into a rout.

VGK controlled 58% of 5v5 expected goals (3.57–2.63). Their shot quality exceeded Toronto's: 0.071 expected goals per shot versus 0.049. In high-danger chances, Vegas converted 2 of 5, while Toronto managed 1.

A. Stolarz faced 30 shots and conceded 1.4 more goals than expected. A. Hill stopped 18 of 21 (0.857 SV%). Toronto couldn't generate volume—they held 40% of shot attempts (21–31)—or convert their limited opportunities.

Toronto scored 2 goals on 29 rush chances. Vegas, though, went 3 for 27 on the rush and converted 1 of 4 rebound opportunities. M. Stone scored twice and added 1 assist in 18:19, including a wrist shot from the wing at 19:01 of the third.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VGK2 / 5 · 1.59 xG
TOR0 / 1 · 0.22 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VGK3 / 13 · 1.37 xG
TOR3 / 17 · 1.93 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VGK1 / 32 · 0.62 xG
TOR0 / 36 · 0.48 xG

VGK went 3-for-13 from medium danger on 1.37 expected goals — 1.6 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VGK
6 G · 3.57 xG · +2.4
TOR
3 G · 2.63 xG · +0.4
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. HillVGK
-0.4
A. StolarzTOR
-1.4

VGK finished +2.4 against expected, TOR +0.4 — A. Stolarz (TOR) allowed 1.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VGK
WRIST5/27
SNAP1/5
TIP IN0/2
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP0/1
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/9
TOR
WRIST0/18
SNAP0/4
TIP IN1/6
BACKHAND2/4
SLAP0/2
BAT0/1
WRAP AROUND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/18
VGK
TOR
Off the rush
3 G on 27 · 2.00 xG
2 G on 29 · 2.33 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.32 xG
1 G on 2 · 0.16 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 5-for-27, TOR 0-for-18. VGK scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Stone
#61 · R · VGK
2 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 18:19 TOI · +3
M. Knies
#23 · L · TOR
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 20:09 TOI
J. Eichel
#9 · C · VGK
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 19:16 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • A. Stolarz (TOR) gave up 1.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • VGK had the higher quality looks — 0.071 xG/shot vs 0.049.
  • VGK was clinical in the high-danger zone — 2/5 on HD chances (40%).
  • TOR was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • VGK was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 27 rush chances.
  • VGK created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • VGK outperformed their expected goals by 2.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · VGK at TOR · 7:00 PM ET

The Golden Knights are the model's lean over the Maple Leafs — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 2:13 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

55%
VGK
Model favorite
55%
45%
VGK50TOR

VGK by 10 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score VGK 2.62.3 TOR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

VGK← edge
edge →TOR
54.0%5v5 xG%46.0%
52.0%Corsi%45.0%
2.52xGF / 602.24
2.11xGA / 602.67
2.12Goals for / gm2.09
2.10Goals against / gm2.52
0.983PDO — luck, not skill1.002

VGK holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.983 vs 1.002) says TOR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Vegas should win this game, and the numbers agree. The model projects a 2.6–2.3 victory with the Golden Knights at 55% win probability, built on a fundamental edge in how the game actually plays out.

The Golden Knights own the underlying play by a significant margin. They're generating 54.0% of 5v5 expected goals against Toronto's 46.0%, a gap that reflects territorial dominance. That advantage extends to shot attempt share: Vegas leads 52.0% in Corsi, suggesting they'll consistently control the board and limit Toronto's offensive looks.

But here's where the edge grows sharper. Vegas is running cold on PDO—0.983 against Toronto's 1.002. That's a regression signal. The Knights are underperforming their shot quality; positive variance is inevitable, and it likely breaks in their favor. Both teams are sitting at 0% on high-danger goal and rebound rates, which means scoring will track closely to underlying shot metrics.

The rest advantage belongs to Vegas as well. Toronto arrives on one day of rest after a back-to-back; the Golden Knights have three days to prepare. That recovery gap matters in the third period.

Goaltending enters as a complication. J. Woll is caught on a back-to-back for the Leafs, raising the question of whether he starts or cedes to a backup. A tired starter is often worse than the alternative.

Players to Watch

Vegas: Tomas Hertl operates at 0.88 xG/60 with five goals and 17 assists on 4.3% shooting. Brandon Saad carries 0.91 xG/60 with three goals and six assists on 4.1% shooting, but is marked inactive.

Toronto: Auston Matthews leads at 1.10 xG/60 with 17 goals and 13 assists on 10.6% shooting. John Tavares follows at 0.91 xG/60 with 15 goals, 24 assists, and three high-danger goals on 12.4% shooting.

Vegas's defensive weak link is Rasmus Andersson; Toronto's is Bo Groulx. If the model's edge holds, Vegas's underlying advantage should convert before either defense is exposed.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
TOR
Auston Matthews17G 13A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.6% sh
John Tavares15G 24A
0.91 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.4% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters