Backcheck
Recap · VGK at OTT

Senators run the Golden Knights off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 2:32 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
VGK
Vegas Golden Knights
1
Home
OTT
Ottawa Senators
7
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.47Expected goals3.84
61% share for the better side
20Shot attempts (SOG)32
5High-danger chances5
49Corsi (all attempts)73
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Senators defeated the Golden Knights 7-1, a scoreline that far exceeds the underlying control battle. At 5v5, Ottawa held 61% of expected goals (3.84–2.47)—a clear advantage, but not enough to explain a 6-goal margin.

The delta came from finishing and goaltending. Sogaard stopped 1.47 goals above expected while delivering a 0.950 save percentage. Hill coughed up 3.16 goals beyond expected on 32 shots (0.781 SV%), a catastrophic performance that accounts for much of the blowout.

Ottawa was lethal in low-danger areas—three goals came from spots where goaltenders are supposed to convert. On the rush, they scored 5 times on 36 attempts, clinical efficiency. Vegas created four rebound opportunities but buried zero, suggesting their net-crashing wasn't sharp enough. Overall, the Senators overperformed their xG by 3.16 goals, a sign of either elite finishing or bounces landing their way.

The turning point arrived early: Rasmus Andersson's wrist shot from the doorstep (P3, 15:05) set the tone.

Three Stars

  • B. Tkachuk (OTT) — 3A in 14:48
  • S. Halliday (OTT) — 2G, 1A in 07:39
  • T. Chabot (OTT) — 2A in 22:55
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
VGK1 / 5 · 1.01 xG
OTT1 / 5 · 0.99 xG
Medium dangermid-range
VGK0 / 10 · 1.03 xG
OTT3 / 19 · 1.95 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
VGK0 / 34 · 0.42 xG
OTT3 / 49 · 0.91 xG

OTT went 3-for-49 from low danger on 0.91 expected goals — 2.1 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
VGK
1 G · 2.47 xG · -1.5
OTT
7 G · 3.84 xG · +3.2
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
A. HillVGK
-3.2
M. SogaardOTT
+1.5

VGK finished -1.5 against expected, OTT +3.2 — A. Hill (VGK) allowed 3.2 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
VGK
WRIST1/20
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/2
SNAP0/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/18
OTT
WRIST5/31
TIP IN1/7
SLAP0/9
SNAP0/2
BACKHAND1/4
DEFLECTED0/2
OTHER0/18
VGK
OTT
Off the rush
0 G on 20 · 1.73 xG
5 G on 36 · 2.98 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.41 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.19 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: VGK went 1-for-20, OTT 5-for-31. OTT scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Tkachuk
#7 · L · OTT
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 14:48 TOI · +2
S. Halliday
#83 · C · OTT
2 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 07:39 TOI · +3
T. Chabot
#72 · D · OTT
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 22:55 TOI · +3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • M. Sogaard (OTT) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
  • A. Hill (VGK) gave up 3.2 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • OTT scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • OTT was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 36 rush chances.
  • VGK created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • OTT outperformed their expected goals by 3.2 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · VGK at OTT · 5:00 PM ET

Golden Knights at Senators: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:30 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
OTT
Model favorite
47%
53%
VGK50OTT

OTT by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score VGK 2.32.5 OTT; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

VGK← edge
edge →OTT
54.0%5v5 xG%56.0%
52.0%Corsi%53.0%
2.52xGF / 602.66
2.11xGA / 602.12
2.12Goals for / gm2.18
2.10Goals against / gm1.99
0.983PDO — luck, not skill0.993

OTT holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.983 vs 0.993) says OTT has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees a coin flip. Vegas projects to score 2.3 goals, Ottawa 2.5, leaving the Senators with 53% win probability—essentially a pick'em.

Vegas has controlled 54.0% of expected goals and 52.0% of shot attempts at 5v5, numbers that should win games. Ottawa counters with 56.0% xG and 53.0% Corsi%, a marginal edge in the underlying process. The separation emerges in PDO: Vegas at 0.983, Ottawa at 0.993. Vegas is running cold and due for positive regression; Ottawa has been slightly fortunate but closer to sustainable outcomes.

Brady Tkachuk drives Ottawa's attack. At 1.19 expected goals per 60 minutes, 11 goals and 20 assists (2 high-danger goals, 7.5% shooting), he's finishing well above his xG pace—a sign of unsustainable efficiency. Dylan Cozens (1.00 xG/60, 13G 15A, 1 high-danger goal, 9.5% shooting) follows in the same trap: generating at a reasonable rate but benefiting from hot shooting.

Vegas counters with Brandon Saad and Tomas Hertl. Saad carries 0.91 xG/60 with 3 goals and 6 assists (1 high-danger goal, 4.1% shooting), underperforming his underlying chances. Hertl (0.88 xG/60, 5G 17A, 1 high-danger goal, 4.3% shooting) is less obviously starved but still playing ahead of his process. Both are candidates for positive regression if the variance swings.

Defensively, Vegas's Rasmus Andersson and Ottawa's Nick Jensen present vulnerabilities. Both teams show 0% high-danger and 0% rebound scoring, flagging limited second-chance creation or execution on loose pucks.

The verdict stands: Vegas has the process edge, Ottawa has the randomness discount. In a game where the Senators get 53% win probability, there is no edge at all.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

VGK
Brandon Saad3G 6A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.1% sh
Tomas Hertl5G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.3% sh
OTT
Brady Tkachuk11G 20A
1.19 xG/60 · 2 HD · 7.5% sh
Dylan Cozens13G 15A
1.00 xG/60 · 1 HD · 9.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters