Backcheck
Recap · NYI at PHI

Islanders shut out the Flyers, 4-0

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.01–2.35 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 3:07 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYI
New York Islanders
4
Home
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
0
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.01Expected goals2.35
54% share for the better side
23Shot attempts (SOG)21
2High-danger chances3
39Corsi (all attempts)43
Score-adjusted: 43% / 57%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Islanders won 4-0 despite a disadvantage in shot quality. The Flyers generated 2.35 expected goals to the Islanders' 2.01. Yet goaltending and execution diverged sharply: I. Sorokin posted a 1.000 save percentage while the Flyers' S. Ersson finished at 0.826.

Sorokin turned away all 21 shots despite facing 2.35 xG, a +2.35 save above expectation. Ersson surrendered four goals on 23 shots, allowing 1.99 more than his xG of 2.01 suggested. The gap between expected and actual was wide enough to cover the entire margin.

The Flyers held 48 percent of shot attempts and created three high-danger chances to New York's two. On the board, they outworked their opponent. In execution, they wasted every chance—underperforming their xG by 2.35 goals. The Islanders, conversely, overperformed theirs by 1.99 through rush opportunities and net-crashing that turned loose pucks into goals. On a neutral night, this game lived close to 2.01 vs 2.35. On this one, goaltending and conversion separated them completely.

M. Barzal recorded a goal and an assist in 17:29, while A. Duclair added two assists in 16:02. Jean-Gabriel Pageau scored twice, including a wrist shot from the high slot in the third period.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYI1 / 2 · 0.46 xG
PHI0 / 3 · 0.62 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYI3 / 10 · 1.20 xG
PHI0 / 10 · 1.24 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYI0 / 27 · 0.35 xG
PHI0 / 30 · 0.49 xG

NYI went 3-for-10 from medium danger on 1.20 expected goals — 1.8 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYI
4 G · 2.01 xG · +2.0
PHI
0 G · 2.35 xG · -2.4
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
I. SorokinNYI
+2.3
S. ErssonPHI
-2.0

NYI finished +2.0 against expected, PHI -2.4 — I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.3 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYI
WRIST2/18
SNAP0/2
TIP IN1/4
SLAP1/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/10
PHI
WRIST0/8
SNAP0/11
TIP IN0/5
SLAP0/5
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/12
NYI
PHI
Off the rush
4 G on 17 · 1.55 xG
0 G on 24 · 2.05 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.27 xG
0 G on 1 · 0.19 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYI went 2-for-18, PHI 0-for-8. NYI scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Barzal
#13 · C · NYI
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 17:29 TOI · +1
A. Duclair
#11 · L · NYI
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 16:02 TOI · +1
J. Pageau
#44 · C · NYI
2 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 13:30 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) stopped 2.3 goals above expected.
  • S. Ersson (PHI) gave up 2.0 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • NYI was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 17 rush chances.
  • NYI created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • PHI underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • NYI outperformed their expected goals by 2.0 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • I. Sorokin (NYI) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYI at PHI · 7:00 PM ET

Islanders at Flyers: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 2:41 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

54%
PHI
Model favorite
46%
54%
NYI50PHI

PHI by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYI 2.32.6 PHI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYI← edge
edge →PHI
48.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
49.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.48xGF / 602.26
2.69xGA / 602.20
1.78Goals for / gm1.96
1.94Goals against / gm1.82
0.993PDO — luck, not skill1.008

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.993 vs 1.008) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The Flyers get a coin flip at home. Models project a 2.3-2.6 New York goal margin in Philadelphia's favor—close enough that 55% win probability barely qualifies as an edge.

The underlying advantage belongs entirely to the Flyers. Philadelphia owns 51.0% expected goals at even strength versus the Islanders' 48.0%, yet New York has squeezed slightly better possession value: their 49.0% Corsi sits fractionally above the Flyers' 48.0%, meaning they're not out-chanced so much as outgunned. Philadelphia's luck has run ahead—a 1.008 PDO suggests their conversions will normalize. The Islanders' 0.993 PDO points the other way, implying positive regression in their near future.

Anders Lee anchors the Islanders' attack at 1.20 expected goals per 60 minutes. His 9 goals and 20 assists include 2 from hard chances, but his 6.4% shooting rate trails what volume forecasts. Bo Horvat drives at 0.87 xG/60 with 18 goals, 10 assists (3 from hard chances), banking 12.8% shooting. Owen Tippett leads the Flyers at 0.88 xG/60—19 goals and 18 assists with 2 hard-chance conversions at 12.1%. Christian Dvorak complements at 0.81 xG/60, scoring 12 goals and 21 assists (3 from hard chances) on 11.2%.

Neither team scores from hard chances or rebounds (both at 0%), concentrating all scoring into primary chances. Alexander Romanov is the Islanders' defensive weak link. Christian Dvorak fills that role for Philadelphia.

This is a true coin flip. The Flyers own the underlying play, but regression tilts toward the Islanders. Neither margin tips much beyond the home-ice edge.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters