Backcheck
Recap · STL at DAL

Stars run the Blues off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 4:11 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
STL
St. Louis Blues
4
Home
DAL
Dallas Stars
5
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.25Expected goals3.56
61% share for the better side
18Shot attempts (SOG)28
2High-danger chances6
45Corsi (all attempts)49
Score-adjusted: 50% / 50%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

The Stars dominated high-danger chances (6–2) but barely escaped with a 5–4 victory, saved only by superior control of other offensive metrics. Dallas held 61% of expected goals (3.56–2.25) and generated far more dangerous looks, yet St. Louis converted their limited chances efficiently.

The Blues scored 4 goals on 21 rush chances to Dallas's 2 on 20, leveraging efficiency in transition where the Stars couldn't keep up. The Stars generated 9 rebound opportunities and converted 3, but that advantage wasn't enough to overcome St. Louis's finishing touch.

Both teams beat their expected goals: the Blues overperformed by 1.75 goals while Dallas overperformed by 1.44. That narrow difference in fortune nearly cost the Stars. J. Binnington gave up 1.44 goals more than expected despite facing only 18 shots to Dallas's 28.

Dallas's quality shot-making proved decisive—they generated 0.073 expected goals per shot versus St. Louis's 0.050—with that depth of offensive threat eventually wearing down the Blues. The turning point came when Jamie Benn snapped a shot from the top of the circles.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
STL0 / 2 · 0.46 xG
DAL1 / 6 · 1.20 xG
Medium dangermid-range
STL4 / 12 · 1.40 xG
DAL4 / 19 · 2.10 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
STL0 / 31 · 0.39 xG
DAL0 / 24 · 0.26 xG

STL went 4-for-12 from medium danger on 1.40 expected goals — 2.6 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
STL
4 G · 2.25 xG · +1.8
DAL
5 G · 3.56 xG · +1.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. BinningtonSTL
-1.4
J. OettingerDAL
-1.8

STL finished +1.8 against expected, DAL +1.4 — J. Oettinger (DAL) allowed 1.8 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
STL
SNAP3/13
SLAP1/7
BACKHAND0/2
WRIST0/2
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED0/2
OTHER0/18
DAL
SNAP5/26
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/5
WRIST0/3
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/12
STL
DAL
Off the rush
4 G on 21 · 1.68 xG
2 G on 20 · 1.69 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 1 · 0.23 xG
3 G on 9 · 1.47 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: STL went 3-for-13, DAL 5-for-26. STL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Benn
#14 · L · DAL
2 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 12:34 TOI · +1
M. Heiskanen
#4 · D · DAL
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 25:20 TOI · +1
J. Faulk
#72 · D · STL
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:40 TOI · +2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Binnington (STL) gave up 1.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • DAL generated far more dangerous chances — 0.073 xG/shot vs 0.050. Quality over quantity.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 20 rush chances.
  • STL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
  • DAL created 9 rebound opportunities (3 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • STL outperformed their expected goals by 1.8 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · STL at DAL · 9:30 PM ET

Blues at Stars: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 4:09 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
DAL
Model favorite
47%
53%
STL50DAL

DAL by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score STL 2.32.5 DAL; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

STL← edge
edge →DAL
49.0%5v5 xG%51.0%
48.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.34xGF / 602.36
2.40xGA / 602.29
2.00Goals for / gm2.07
2.12Goals against / gm1.68
1.000PDO — luck, not skill1.024

DAL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.000 vs 1.024) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model can't pick a winner: projected 2.3-2.5 goal range with Dallas at 53% win probability. This is as close to a pick'em as exists.

Dallas has the form advantage, posting 6-4-0 in their last 10. St. Louis has been worse, mustering -8 goal differential over the same span. But underlying play tightens the gap. Dallas leads in expected goals (51.0% xG% vs. 49.0%), though barely. Shot volume favors St. Louis (48.0% Corsi% to 47.0%), a sign of defensive discipline. The Stars' power lies partly in luck: their 1.024 PDO is unsustainably hot, making Dallas the team to fade if regression comes.

Both goaltenders are on back-to-backs. Keep watch for backup deployments or tired play from J. Oettinger and J. Hofer.

The matchup centers on offensive firepower. Jimmy Snuggerud drives St. Louis's attack at 0.86 xG per 60 with 15 goals and a 11.9% shooting rate—markers of elite efficiency. Dylan Holloway (0.82 xG/60, 13 goals) adds volume. Dallas counters with Jason Robertson's elite 0.96 xG/60 and 25 goals, the game's strongest individual threat. Michael Bunting (0.83 xG/60, 8 goals) provides secondary punch.

Raw shot quality data mirrors the advanced metrics. Both teams run 0% high-danger goal rates and 0% rebound rates—a sign of either strong goaltending or incomplete data, more likely the latter. St. Louis's defensive weak link remains Snuggerud; Dallas's is Tyler Myers. Neither team has clear separation on talent. This one likely comes down to which goalie is sharper and which team gets the fortunate bounces.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

STL
Jimmy Snuggerud15G 22A
0.86 xG/60 · 2 HD · 11.9% sh
Dylan Holloway13G 24A
0.82 xG/60 · 1 HD · 10.8% sh
DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Michael Bunting8G 14A
0.83 xG/60 · 0 HD · 7.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters