Motion-blurred skater in a New York Islanders sweater
Breakdown · FLA at NYI

Islanders steal one from the Panthers against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Islanders stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 4.58–2.20 and won anyway.

FLA 4 · NYI 5
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 5:06 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Islanders won 5-4 despite generating just 2.20 expected goals to Florida's 4.58. This was a heist — the Panthers created the better chances (68% of expected goals), but finishing and goaltending flipped the scoreboard.

S. Bobrovsky faced a tougher assignment than his 21/26 save line suggests. He underperformed his xG by 2.80 goals, meaning the Islanders converted chances a goaltender typically denies. D. Rittich overperformed by 0.58 — Florida went 0 for 7 on high-danger chances while New York scored on low-danger opportunities.

The Panthers' quality-per-shot advantage was real: 0.059 xG per attempt versus New York's 0.042. The Islanders held 44% of shot attempts (26–33) but made every dangerous look count.

Anders Lee's wrist shot from the doorstep at 19:28 of the third period was the inflection point. New York's scrappier execution turned the goaltending variance into a win.

The Islanders were lethal off the rush, converting 5 on 24 chances; Florida managed 4 on 32. The Islanders created 3 rebound opportunities, Florida created 10; neither team converted any.

This wasn't about effort. It was about outcome variance working in the wrong team's favor — and New York taking the gift.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 1
FLA
4
NYI
5

Islanders steal one from the Panthers against the run of play

Chances 4.6 – 2.2Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Panthers deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
FLA
4.58
NYI
2.20
68% of the chances33%

The board read FLA 4, NYI 5. The chances read FLA 4.6, NYI 2.2.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NYI
+2.8
goals above expected
NYI2.20 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
FLA4.58 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored

The Islanders scored 2.8 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 03:44FLAS. Vilmanis1–0
  2. P1 14:54FLAS. BennettPP2–0
  3. P1 18:01NYIM. Schaefer2–1
  4. P2 07:28NYIC. Soucy2–2
  5. P2 12:04FLAS. Bennett3–2
  6. P2 17:14NYIB. Horvat3–3
  7. P3 10:29NYIM. Schaefer3–4
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
FLA
60 shots
4
Final
99 shots
NYI
39 shots
5
FLA attackNYI attack
FLA NYI Goal
60
shots · 4 in
39
shots · 5 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
FLANYI
0 / 7
1.64 xG
High danger
1 / 2
0.44 xG
1 / 18
2.06 xG
Medium
1 / 10
1.08 xG
3 / 53
0.88 xG
Low
3 / 41
0.68 xG

The Panthers went 0 for 7 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B
D. Rittich
+0.6
NYI · 29/33
F
S. Bobrovsky
−2.8
FLA · 21/26
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Islanders steal one from the Panthers against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–7
  1. 03:44FLAS. Vilmanis(A. Greer, S. Bobrovsky)1–0
  2. 14:54FLAS. Bennettpower play(A. Ekblad, M. Tkachuk)2–0
  3. 18:01NYIM. Schaefer(R. Pulock, M. Barzal)2–1
2ndshots 8–6
  1. 07:28NYIC. Soucy(S. Holmstrom, T. DeAngelo)2–2
  2. 12:04FLAS. Bennett(M. Tkachuk)3–2
  3. 17:14NYIB. Horvat(M. Schaefer)3–3
3rdshots 17–13
  1. 10:29NYIM. Schaefer(O. Palat)3–4
  2. 18:02FLAS. Reinhartpower play(A. Ekblad, M. Tkachuk)4–4
  3. 19:28NYIA. Lee(T. DeAngelo, A. Pelech)4–5

score reads FLA–NYI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.20
NYI chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.8
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.043
NYI puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
40.5%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

4.58Expected goals2.20
FLA 68% of the chance quality
33Shots on goal26
7High-danger chances2
78All attempts (Corsi)53
Adjusted for score: FLA 58% · NYI 42%
Faceoffs · NYI won36%off41%neu71%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
FLA0 / 7 · 1.64 xG
NYI1 / 2 · 0.44 xG
Medium dangermid-range
FLA1 / 18 · 2.06 xG
NYI1 / 10 · 1.08 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
FLA3 / 53 · 0.88 xG
NYI3 / 41 · 0.68 xG

NYI went 3-for-41 from low danger on 0.68 expected goals — 2.3 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
FLA
4 G · 4.58 xG · -0.6
NYI
5 G · 2.20 xG · +2.8
0123456

FLA finished -0.6 against expected, NYI +2.8.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
FLA
SNAP2/29
WRIST0/11
BACKHAND2/9
SLAP0/3
TIP IN0/5
DEFLECTED0/2
WRAP AROUND0/1
OTHER0/18
NYI
SNAP3/10
WRIST1/22
BACKHAND0/3
SLAP1/3
TIP IN0/0
DEFLECTED0/1
WRAP AROUND0/0
OTHER0/14
FLA
NYI
Off the rush
4 G on 32
2.77 xG
5 G on 24
1.76 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 10
1.15 xG
0 G on 3
0.15 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: FLA went 2-for-29, NYI 3-for-10. NYI scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
S. Bobrovsky
FLA · 21/26 · .808
-2.8
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/20.4-0.6
Medium1/101.1+0.1
Low3/410.7-2.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

D. Rittich
NYI · 29/33 · .879
+0.6
saved above expected
B
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/71.6+1.6
Medium1/182.1+1.1
Low3/530.9-2.1

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

99 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
FLA
60 shots
4
Final
99 shots
NYI
39 shots
5
FLA attackNYI attack
FLA NYI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — FLA left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Schaefer
#48 · D · NYI
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 23:17 on ice · +4
M. Tkachuk
#19 · L · FLA
0 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 19:16 on ice · -1
A. Ekblad
#5 · D · FLA
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 26:24 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sun, Mar 1
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 5:05 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

This is a coin flip. The model projects a 2.6-2.6 game with the Islanders at 51% win probability—close enough that the deciding factor will be execution, not talent.

The season numbers suggest two reasonably matched teams. Florida's 49.0% expected goals share and 52.0% Corsi percentage point to a team that controls play; the Islanders countered with 48.0% xG and 49.0% Corsi, narrowly behind. Both teams sit at slightly different luck levels—Florida's 0.989 PDO and New York's 0.993 suggest the Islanders have gotten marginally more favorable results than their play deserves, while the Panthers have been just slightly unlucky. If regression matters, this favors Florida.

What separates them right now is form. The Islanders are 7-3-0 in their last 10 games, the hotter team by points pace. Florida, by contrast, hasn't established the same rhythm, making New York the slight favorite despite the underlying numbers suggesting parity.

The Panthers' chief offensive threat is Sam Bennett, who combines elite volume at 0.97 xG/60 with 18 goals and 19 assists on a 13.1% shooting percentage and 6 high-danger goals. Brad Marchand supplies secondary scoring at 0.93 xG/60 with 17 goals and 9 assists, 3 high-danger goals, and a 19.5% shooting percentage.

The Islanders' offense leans on Anders Lee, whose 1.20 xG/60 leads both forward groups despite converting at just 6.4%; his 2 high-danger goals underscore a disconnect between opportunity and finishing. Bo Horvat rounds out the secondary attack at 0.87 xG/60 with 18 goals, 10 assists, 3 high-danger goals, and a 12.8% shooting percentage.

The territorial story favors Florida: the Panthers drive Corsi at 52.0%, meaning they'll spend most of the night in the Islanders' zone. Alexander Romanov emerges as a defensive weak link the Panthers will exploit.

A wrinkle on the back-to-back: both I. Sorokin and D. Tarasov are on consecutive games, raising the possibility of a tired starter or a surprise backup appearance. Whichever goaltender sees action will shape the final margin.

The edge goes to New York by a hair—their recent form and slight luck advantage outweigh Florida's territorial control. But the model is right to call this a pick'em. Bennett and the Panthers' shot generation could easily flip this. Expect a tight game decided by chance bounces.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NYI 51%
51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
FLA50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score FLA 2.6–2.6 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
FLA← edge
edge →NYI
49.0%48.0%
52.0%49.0%
2.482.48
2.562.69
1.981.78
2.211.94
0.9890.993

FLA holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.989 vs 0.993) says NYI has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
FLA
4-6-0
-1 GD · 1d rest
NYI
7-3-0
+4 GD · 1d rest
0.989
FLA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.993
NYI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Panthers drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Things to watch
  • The Panthers drive Corsi at 52.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • I. Sorokin is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • D. Tarasov is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Islanders are the hotter team by points pace (7-3-0 in their last 10).
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
FLA
Expected in goal
D. Tarasov
back-to-back.947 last start
Backup Sergei Bobrovsky · -12.2 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NYI
Expected in goal
I. Sorokin
back-to-back.900 last start
Backup Ilya Sorokin · +25.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
FLA
Sam Bennett18G 19A
0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 13.1% sh
Brad Marchand17G 9A
0.93 xG/60 · 3 HD · 19.5% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next