Motion-blurred skater in a Columbus Blue Jackets sweater
Breakdown · CBJ at NYR

Blue Jackets steal one from the Rangers against the run of play

The verdict · stolen

The Blue Jackets stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.63–3.80 and won anyway.

CBJ 5 · NYR 4
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 5:52 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Columbus stole this one. New York built a 59–41 edge in expected goals, controlled 53% of shot attempts, and landed 11 high-danger chances against Columbus's four. The Rangers created the better looks. The Blue Jackets won 5–4 in overtime anyway.

The metric most at odds with the scoreboard is xG. New York's 3.80 to Columbus's 2.63 should have sunk a weaker goaltender. Instead, I. Shesterkin surrendered 2.37 goals above expectation. E. Merzlikins stopped 29 of 33.

The turning point came at 1:04 of overtime: K. Marchenko's snap shot from the high slot. Finish separated these teams. Columbus converted five of 25 rush chances; New York got two.

Columbus overperformed their xG by 2.37 goals—either elite execution or lucky bounces, probably both. The Rangers controlled the game architecturally: maintained possession, generated high-quality chances, played in control. Yet they left without a point. That's the cost of dominance that doesn't convert; you can control the process and still lose.

K. Marchenko led the way (2G, 1A in 18:04). G. Perreault kept New York competitive (2G, 1A in 17:18). D. Severson steadied the Blue Jackets' back end (2A in 21:59).

The Rangers controlled the game. The Blue Jackets controlled the scoreboard.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · OT · Mar 2
CBJ
5
NYR
4

Blue Jackets steal one from the Rangers against the run of play

Chances 2.6 – 3.8Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Rangers deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
CBJ
2.63
NYR
3.80
41% of the chances59%

The board read CBJ 5, NYR 4. The chances read CBJ 2.6, NYR 3.8.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
CBJ
+2.4
goals above expected
CBJ2.63 expected · 5 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR3.80 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored

The Blue Jackets scored 2.4 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 05:50CBJA. Fantilli1–0
  2. P1 15:32CBJK. MarchenkoPP2–0
  3. P2 03:27CBJS. MonahanSH3–0
  4. P2 11:54CBJM. Olivier4–0
  5. P3 00:30NYRV. Gavrikov4–1
  6. P3 00:54NYRG. Perreault4–2
  7. P3 12:52NYRW. BorgenPP4–3
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
CBJ
38 shots
5
Final
83 shots
NYR
45 shots
4
CBJ attackNYR attack
CBJ NYR Goal
38
shots · 5 in
45
shots · 4 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
CBJNYR
0 / 4
0.97 xG
High danger
3 / 11
2.37 xG
4 / 10
0.95 xG
Medium
0 / 8
0.75 xG
1 / 37
0.71 xG
Low
1 / 48
0.68 xG

High-danger looks: CBJ 0 of 4, NYR 3 of 11.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
C
E. Merzlikins
−0.2
CBJ · 29/33
F
I. Shesterkin
−2.4
NYR · 24/29
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Blue Jackets steal one from the Rangers against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 10–4
  1. 05:50CBJA. Fantilli(K. Marchenko, D. Mateychuk)1–0
  2. 15:32CBJK. Marchenkopower play(I. Provorov, C. Coyle)2–0
2ndshots 9–12
  1. 03:27CBJS. Monahanshorthanded3–0
  2. 11:54CBJM. Olivier(C. Coyle, D. Severson)4–0
3rdshots 9–17
  1. 00:30NYRV. Gavrikov(A. Lafrenière, W. Cuylle)4–1
  2. 00:54NYRG. Perreault4–2
  3. 12:52NYRW. Borgenpower play(G. Perreault, J. Miller)4–3
  4. 15:14NYRG. Perreault(W. Borgen, V. Trocheck)4–4
OTshots 1–0
  1. 01:04CBJK. Marchenko(D. Severson, A. Fantilli)5–4

score reads CBJ–NYR

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.63
CBJ chances
Goals their shots were worth
+2.4
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.038
CBJ puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
43.2%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.63Expected goals3.80
NYR 59% of the chance quality
29Shots on goal33
4High-danger chances11
51All attempts (Corsi)67
Adjusted for score: CBJ 38% · NYR 62%
Faceoffs · NYR won56%off55%neu43%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ0 / 4 · 0.97 xG
NYR3 / 11 · 2.37 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ4 / 10 · 0.95 xG
NYR0 / 8 · 0.75 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ1 / 37 · 0.71 xG
NYR1 / 48 · 0.68 xG

CBJ went 4-for-10 from medium danger on 0.95 expected goals — 3.0 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
5 G · 2.63 xG · +2.4
NYR
4 G · 3.80 xG · +0.2
0123456

CBJ finished +2.4 against expected, NYR +0.2.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST0/13
SNAP3/12
TIP IN1/6
SLAP1/4
DEFLECTED0/1
BACKHAND0/2
OTHER0/13
NYR
WRIST4/29
SNAP0/4
TIP IN0/6
SLAP0/4
DEFLECTED0/2
BACKHAND0/0
OTHER0/22
CBJ
NYR
Off the rush
5 G on 25
1.82 xG
2 G on 25
1.74 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 2
0.33 xG
1 G on 6
1.31 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 0-for-13, NYR 4-for-29. CBJ scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
E. Merzlikins
CBJ · 29/33 · .879
-0.2
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger3/112.4-0.6
Medium0/80.8+0.8
Low1/480.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Shesterkin
NYR · 24/29 · .828
-2.4
saved above expected
F
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/41.0+1.0
Medium4/100.9-3.0
Low1/370.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

83 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
CBJ
38 shots
5
Final
83 shots
NYR
45 shots
4
CBJ attackNYR attack
CBJ NYR Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — CBJ left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
K. Marchenko
#86 · R · CBJ
2 G · 1 A · 4 SOG · 18:04 on ice
G. Perreault
#94 · R · NYR
2 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 17:18 on ice · +1
D. Severson
#78 · D · CBJ
0 G · 2 A · 0 SOG · 21:59 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Mon, Mar 2
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 5:08 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.5-2.5 game with the Blue Jackets at 51% win probability—this is about as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

The Blue Jackets have the form advantage. They're 7-2-1 in their last 10, the hotter recent pace. The Rangers, meanwhile, are -11 goal differential in that same stretch—they're leaking chances.

The Blue Jackets also own the underlying play. At 5v5, they're at 52.0% expected goals and 51.0% Corsi; the Rangers sit at 48.0% and 49.0%. Those aren't enormous gaps, but they're consistent. The Rangers' 1.009 PDO over the season suggests some regression is coming, while the Blue Jackets' 1.003 keeps them closer to true talent. The Blue Jackets' weak defensive link is Conor Garland; the Rangers have Vincent Iorio as a liability.

The shot quality angle matters here. Boone Jenner generates 0.98 xG per 60 on a 9.6% shot rate—unusually low for his 11G, 21A pace, which suggests upside if luck normalizes. Mathieu Olivier adds 0.89 xG/60 with a 13.3% clip, giving the Blue Jackets two avenues to score. Olivier's 12 goals on heavier volume is the real threat; Jenner's 21 assists suggest he's threading plays, not just shooting.

For the Rangers, Adam Sykora is running hot at 20.0% shooting on 0.91 xG/60—that's unsustainable and masks a shallower underlying advantage than his three goals indicate. Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8G, 11A) is the steadier contributor. Neither team scores much from high-danger chances (both at 0% HD goal rate) or off rebounds (0% for both), which flattens the offensive ceiling on both sides.

The Blue Jackets project to control the game and should be favored. But 51% is the fair number for a team with a modest underlying edge and only a recent-form cushion to show for it. The Rangers aren't without recourse—their PDO advantage, while small, is real, and Sykora's heater could hold. That's why this plays as a coin flip, not a Blue Jackets lean.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

CBJ 51%
51%
CBJ
Model favorite
51%
49%
CBJ50NYR

CBJ by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.5–2.5 NYR; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
CBJ← edge
edge →NYR
52.0%48.0%
51.0%49.0%
2.632.26
2.432.40
2.121.88
1.981.90
1.0031.009

CBJ holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.003 vs 1.009) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
CBJ
7-2-1
+11 GD · 2d rest
NYR
2-7-1
-11 GD · 2d rest
1.003
CBJ PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Blue Jackets own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
Things to watch
  • The Blue Jackets own the underlying play — 52.0% 5v5 xG vs 48.0%.
  • The Blue Jackets are the hotter team by points pace (7-2-1 in their last 10).
  • The Rangers are underwater at -11 goal differential over their last 10.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
CBJ
Expected in goal
J. Greaves
2 days rest.852 last start
Backup Jet Greaves · +16.5 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NYR
Expected in goal
I. Shesterkin
2 days rest.941 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
Keep going

Where to next