Oilers run the Senators off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Oilers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Edmonton's 5–4 overtime victory glossed over a rout. The Oilers generated 11 high-danger chances to Ottawa's 1—a gap that made the scoreline a lie.
That margin wasn't an outlier. Edmonton controlled 71% of expected goals (5.42–2.18), converting their chances with ruthless efficiency. Their shot quality was elite: 0.080 xG per attempt versus Ottawa's 0.046. The power play was surgical—3 goals on 11 shots (1.47 xG). On the rush, they buried 3 of 33 chances.
L. Ullmark (Ottawa) posted a 0.865 save percentage on 32 saves, an impressive performance against relentless offensive pressure. C. Ingram (Edmonton) allowed 17 goals on 21 shots (0.810 SV%), underperforming expected by 1.82 goals. Ottawa, meanwhile, overperformed their xG by 1.8 goals—elite finishing or fortune, depending on your read of variance.
E. Bouchard's slap shot from the high slot at 01:50 of overtime decided the game.
The danger ladder
OTT went 3-for-13 from medium danger on 1.30 expected goals — 1.7 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
OTT finished +1.8 against expected, EDM -0.4 — C. Ingram (EDM) allowed 1.8 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 2-for-16, EDM 3-for-30. OTT scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- C. Ingram (EDM) gave up 1.8 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- EDM generated far more dangerous chances — 0.080 xG/shot vs 0.046. Quality over quantity.
- EDM was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 33 rush chances.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 24 rush chances.
- EDM created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- OTT outperformed their expected goals by 1.8 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
- L. Ullmark was a wall on HD chances — 91% SV on 11 high-danger shots.
- EDM power play was dominant — 3 PPG on 11 PP shots (1.47 xG).