Senators run the Flames off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Senators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Ottawa's 4-1 victory masks one underlying reality: they generated nine high-danger chances to Calgary's one, a ratio the final score barely captures.
That disparity flowed from territorial dominance. The Senators controlled 75% of 5v5 expected goals (5.21 to 1.76) and out-shot Calgary 37 to 20. Quality separated them further: Ottawa's chances carried 0.070 xG per shot, nearly double Calgary's 0.039.
Cooley, Calgary's goalie, kept the game from becoming a rout. He stopped 3.21 goals above expected—a performance that compressed what the underlying numbers suggested into a 4-1 final. Ullmark, Ottawa's counterpart, had less work but delivered: he overperformed his expected save percentage by 0.76 against relentless high-danger chances.
Off the rush, the Senators were lethal: two goals on 33 chances. In the offensive zone, they also created six rebounds without converting, a sign of their complete control.
Calgary generated 20 shots but none carried consequence. Against a team dominating quality and territory to this degree, volume becomes irrelevant.
The danger ladder
OTT went 2-for-9 from high danger on 2.73 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
OTT finished -1.2 against expected, CGY -0.8 — D. Cooley (CGY) saved 3.2 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: OTT went 3-for-32, CGY 1-for-19. OTT scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- CGY had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- D. Cooley (CGY) stopped 3.2 goals above expected.
- OTT had the higher quality looks — 0.070 xG/shot vs 0.039.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 33 rush chances.
- OTT created 6 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- D. Cooley (CGY) saved 3.2 goals above expected — stole the show.