Motion-blurred skater in a New Jersey Devils sweater
Breakdown · NYR at NJD

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYR 3 · NJD 6
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:00 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

New Jersey won 6-3, but one number contradicted the scoreboard: both teams created six high-danger chances, yet the Rangers converted zero. J. Markstrom stopped every high-danger attempt; New York's failure to convert cost them.

At 5v5, the underlying dominance extended beyond high-danger looks. New Jersey controlled 61% of expected goals (4.69–3.05), a margin suggesting relentless pressure. They held 64% of shot attempts (35–20). Their power play was a weapon: 3 goals on 13 shots, an offensive rate New York never approached.

Where the statistics aligned with the final score: New Jersey converted 5 of 37 rush chances. New York scored 3 of 22—the same rate, from half the volume. New Jersey crashed for rebounds and capitalized (3 created, 1 finished); New York's five rebound looks went unconverted, a summary of the night.

The Devils overperformed their xG by 1.31 goals, courtesy of execution or fortune. J. Quick (29 saves, 0.853 SV%) absorbed a barrage; J. Markstrom (17 saves, 0.850 SV%) faced fewer shots but had to be perfect on the plays that mattered.

Three Stars

  • #86 J. Hughes (NJD) — 3G, 1A in 20:44
  • #63 J. Bratt (NJD) — 1G, 2A in 16:51
  • #8 J. Kovacevic (NJD) — 2A in 20:05
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 7
NYR
3
NJD
6

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 3.0 – 4.7Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Devils earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
3.05
NJD
4.69
39% of the chances61%

The board read NYR 3, NJD 6. The chances read NYR 3.0, NJD 4.7.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NJD
+1.3
goals above expected
NJD4.69 expected · 6 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR3.05 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:06NJDJ. Bratt0–1
  2. P1 06:26NYRW. Borgen1–1
  3. P1 08:36NYRV. Gavrikov2–1
  4. P1 19:47NJDD. MercerPP2–2
  5. P2 15:52NJDJ. HughesPP2–3
  6. P2 16:53NYRW. Cuylle3–3
  7. P3 08:05NJDN. HischierPP3–4
+2 more on the full breakdown
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
33 shots
3
Final
87 shots
NJD
54 shots
6
NYR attackNJD attack
NYR NJD Goal
33
shots · 3 in
54
shots · 6 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRNJD
0 / 6
1.27 xG
High danger
2 / 6
1.81 xG
1 / 11
1.34 xG
Medium
4 / 21
2.17 xG
2 / 29
0.44 xG
Low
0 / 39
0.71 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
C
J. Markstrom
+0.1
NJD · 17/20
D
J. Quick
−0.3
NYR · 29/34
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 8–6
  1. 01:06NJDJ. Bratt(C. Glass, J. Kovacevic)0–1
  2. 06:26NYRW. Borgen(V. Trocheck)1–1
  3. 08:36NYRV. Gavrikov(N. Laba, T. Kartye)2–1
  4. 19:47NJDD. Mercerpower play(L. Hughes, A. Gritsyuk)2–2
2ndshots 5–14
  1. 15:52NJDJ. Hughespower play(J. Bratt, D. Hamilton)2–3
  2. 16:53NYRW. Cuylle(B. Schneider, T. Raddysh)3–3
3rdshots 7–15
  1. 08:05NJDN. Hischierpower play(J. Bratt, J. Hughes)3–4
  2. 16:56NJDJ. Hughes(C. Brown)3–5
  3. 19:28NJDJ. Hughesempty net(C. Brown, J. Kovacevic)3–6

score reads NYR–NJD

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
4.69
NJD chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.3
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.026
NJD puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
58.9%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.05Expected goals4.69
NJD 61% of the chance quality
20Shots on goal35
6High-danger chances6
46All attempts (Corsi)66
Adjusted for score: NYR 42% · NJD 58%
Faceoffs · NJD won50%off48%neu37%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 6 · 1.27 xG
NJD2 / 6 · 1.81 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 11 · 1.34 xG
NJD4 / 21 · 2.17 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR2 / 29 · 0.44 xG
NJD0 / 39 · 0.71 xG

NJD went 4-for-21 from medium danger on 2.17 expected goals — 1.8 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
3 G · 3.05 xG · -0.1
NJD
6 G · 4.69 xG · +1.3
01234567

NYR finished -0.1 against expected, NJD +1.3.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST1/20
SLAP2/6
SNAP0/2
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/2
POKE0/0
OTHER0/13
NJD
WRIST3/31
SLAP1/6
SNAP1/10
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/12
NYR
NJD
Off the rush
3 G on 22
1.79 xG
5 G on 37
3.55 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5
0.88 xG
1 G on 3
0.49 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-20, NJD 3-for-31. NJD scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Quick
NYR · 29/34 · .853
-0.3
saved above expected
D
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/61.8-0.2
Medium4/212.2-1.8
Low0/390.7+0.7

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Markstrom
NJD · 17/20 · .850
+0.1
saved above expected
C
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/61.3+1.3
Medium1/111.3+0.3
Low2/290.4-1.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

87 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
NYR
33 shots
3
Final
87 shots
NJD
54 shots
6
NYR attackNJD attack
NYR NJD Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, NJD right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Hughes
#86 · C · NJD
3 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 20:44 on ice · +1
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 16:51 on ice
J. Kovacevic
#8 · D · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:05 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Mar 7
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 6:25 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model won't choose. With the Devils at 53% win probability and the expected score near 2.4–2.5 goals per side, this sits at pure pick'em.

Both teams hauled in the same recent damage. New York and New Jersey each carry minus-5 goal differential over their last 10 games, each conceding more than they've scored.

The underlying metrics clash. New Jersey leads in possession—51.0 percent Corsi, 50.0 percent expected goals—against New York's 49.0 and 48.0. Yet the Rangers' PDO of 1.009 means their bounces have been favorable, while New Jersey's 0.971 suggests the reverse. The Devils are running cold and should improve, though a single game offers no guarantee the regression arrives on schedule.

I. Shesterkin's back-to-back creates uncertainty. New York may start a backup or a tired starter either way, the goaltending edge blurs.

Shot quality belongs to New Jersey. Timo Meier (1.08 xG/60, 13 goals, 3 high-danger goals) and Jack Hughes (0.88 xG/60, 18 goals, 1 high-danger goal) operate at a higher rate. Yet Adam Sykora (0.91 xG/60, 20.0 percent shooting, 3 goals and 1 assist) sharpens the Rangers' counter, and Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 2 high-danger goals, 13.1 percent shooting) adds thickness. Both teams register 0 percent on high-danger goals and 0 percent on rebounds, which points to missed chances where execution decides games.

Vincent Iorio is New York's defensive liability. Johnathan Kovacevic is New Jersey's. Whoever imposes order first wins the matchup game.

The Devils hold edges in possession and shot volume, which should matter. But neither team executes cleanly, and one game is too small a sample to resolve the uncertainty. A genuine coin flip.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NJD 53%
53%
NJD
Model favorite
47%
53%
NYR50NJD

NJD by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.4–2.5 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR← edge
edge →NJD
48.0%50.0%
49.0%51.0%
2.262.45
2.402.50
1.881.66
1.902.23
1.0090.971

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.009 vs 0.971) says NYR has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
NYR
3-5-2
-5 GD · 1d rest
NJD
4-6-0
-5 GD · 2d rest
1.009
NYR PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.971
NJD PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Regression watch
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Things to watch
  • I. Shesterkin is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Devils are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Rangers are underwater at -5 goal differential over their last 10.
  • The Devils' PDO is 0.971 — running cold, due for positive regression.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
NYR
Expected in goal
I. Shesterkin
back-to-back.938 last start
Backup Igor Shesterkin · +21.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NJD
Expected in goal
J. Markstrom
2 days rest.889 last start
Backup Jacob Markstrom · -11.9 GSAx this season

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Keep going

Where to next