Backcheck
Recap · NYR at NJD

Devils run the Rangers off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Devils earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 6:00 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
3
Home
NJD
New Jersey Devils
6
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.05Expected goals4.69
61% share for the better side
20Shot attempts (SOG)35
6High-danger chances6
46Corsi (all attempts)66
Score-adjusted: 42% / 58%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

New Jersey won 6-3, but one number contradicted the scoreboard: both teams created six high-danger chances, yet the Rangers converted zero. J. Markstrom stopped every high-danger attempt; New York's failure to convert cost them.

At 5v5, the underlying dominance extended beyond high-danger looks. New Jersey controlled 61% of expected goals (4.69–3.05), a margin suggesting relentless pressure. They held 64% of shot attempts (35–20). Their power play was a weapon: 3 goals on 13 shots, an offensive rate New York never approached.

Where the statistics aligned with the final score: New Jersey converted 5 of 37 rush chances. New York scored 3 of 22—the same rate, from half the volume. New Jersey crashed for rebounds and capitalized (3 created, 1 finished); New York's five rebound looks went unconverted, a summary of the night.

The Devils overperformed their xG by 1.31 goals, courtesy of execution or fortune. J. Quick (29 saves, 0.853 SV%) absorbed a barrage; J. Markstrom (17 saves, 0.850 SV%) faced fewer shots but had to be perfect on the plays that mattered.

Three Stars

  • #86 J. Hughes (NJD) — 3G, 1A in 20:44
  • #63 J. Bratt (NJD) — 1G, 2A in 16:51
  • #8 J. Kovacevic (NJD) — 2A in 20:05
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR0 / 6 · 1.27 xG
NJD2 / 6 · 1.81 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR1 / 11 · 1.34 xG
NJD4 / 21 · 2.17 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR2 / 29 · 0.44 xG
NJD0 / 39 · 0.71 xG

NJD went 4-for-21 from medium danger on 2.17 expected goals — 1.8 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
3 G · 3.05 xG · -0.1
NJD
6 G · 4.69 xG · +1.3
01234567
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. QuickNYR
-0.3
J. MarkstromNJD
+0.0

NYR finished -0.1 against expected, NJD +1.3 — J. Quick (NYR) allowed 0.3 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
WRIST1/20
SLAP2/6
SNAP0/2
TIP IN0/3
BACKHAND0/2
POKE0/0
OTHER0/13
NJD
WRIST3/31
SLAP1/6
SNAP1/10
TIP IN1/5
BACKHAND0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/12
NYR
NJD
Off the rush
3 G on 22 · 1.79 xG
5 G on 37 · 3.55 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 0.88 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.49 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-20, NJD 3-for-31. NJD scored 5 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Hughes
#86 · C · NJD
3 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 20:44 TOI · +1
J. Bratt
#63 · L · NJD
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 16:51 TOI
J. Kovacevic
#8 · D · NJD
0 G · 2 A · 1 SOG · 20:05 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYR couldn't convert — 0/6 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • NYR scored 2 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • NJD was lethal off the rush — 5 goals on 37 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 22 rush chances.
  • NJD created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • J. Markstrom was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 6 high-danger shots.
  • NJD power play was dominant — 3 PPG on 13 PP shots (1.31 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at NJD · 3:00 PM ET

Rangers at Devils: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 6:25 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

53%
NJD
Model favorite
47%
53%
NYR50NJD

NJD by 6 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score NYR 2.42.5 NJD; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →NJD
48.0%5v5 xG%50.0%
49.0%Corsi%51.0%
2.26xGF / 602.45
2.40xGA / 602.50
1.88Goals for / gm1.66
1.90Goals against / gm2.23
1.009PDO — luck, not skill0.971

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.009 vs 0.971) says NYR has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model won't choose. With the Devils at 53% win probability and the expected score near 2.4–2.5 goals per side, this sits at pure pick'em.

Both teams hauled in the same recent damage. New York and New Jersey each carry minus-5 goal differential over their last 10 games, each conceding more than they've scored.

The underlying metrics clash. New Jersey leads in possession—51.0 percent Corsi, 50.0 percent expected goals—against New York's 49.0 and 48.0. Yet the Rangers' PDO of 1.009 means their bounces have been favorable, while New Jersey's 0.971 suggests the reverse. The Devils are running cold and should improve, though a single game offers no guarantee the regression arrives on schedule.

I. Shesterkin's back-to-back creates uncertainty. New York may start a backup or a tired starter either way, the goaltending edge blurs.

Shot quality belongs to New Jersey. Timo Meier (1.08 xG/60, 13 goals, 3 high-danger goals) and Jack Hughes (0.88 xG/60, 18 goals, 1 high-danger goal) operate at a higher rate. Yet Adam Sykora (0.91 xG/60, 20.0 percent shooting, 3 goals and 1 assist) sharpens the Rangers' counter, and Gabe Perreault (0.79 xG/60, 8 goals, 2 high-danger goals, 13.1 percent shooting) adds thickness. Both teams register 0 percent on high-danger goals and 0 percent on rebounds, which points to missed chances where execution decides games.

Vincent Iorio is New York's defensive liability. Johnathan Kovacevic is New Jersey's. Whoever imposes order first wins the matchup game.

The Devils hold edges in possession and shot volume, which should matter. But neither team executes cleanly, and one game is too small a sample to resolve the uncertainty. A genuine coin flip.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
NJD
Timo Meier13G 15A
1.08 xG/60 · 3 HD · 6.7% sh
Jack Hughes18G 17A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 11.5% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters