Backcheck
Recap · MIN at COL

Avalanche edge the Wild in a shootout

The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 6:10 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
MIN
Minnesota Wild
2
Home
COL
Colorado Avalanche
3
FINAL / OT
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.78Expected goals5.36
59% share for the better side
34Shot attempts (SOG)36
6High-danger chances7
65Corsi (all attempts)80
Score-adjusted: 45% / 55%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Colorado controlled this game by the metrics—59% of 5v5 expected goals (5.36–3.78)—yet the Wild nearly flipped the scoreboard anyway. That gap between dominance and a shootout-thin margin reveals an Avalanche team that squandered its advantage.

The Avalanche were lethal at the rush, converting 2 goals on 40 chances against Minnesota's 2 on 30. But Colorado underperformed its expected goals by 2.36, suggesting execution faltered despite opportunity. J. Wallstedt's 0.944 save percentage (+3.36 vs expected) was the game's edge—he bailed out a team that had no business staying close. S. Wedgewood (0.941 SV%, +1.78) was excellent, but Wallstedt's outperformance proved decisive.

High-danger chances were tight: Colorado 7, Minnesota 6. Neither team found the net on second chances—both created five rebound opportunities, both converted zero.

The difference arrived in the shootout: Nathan MacKinnon's wrist shot from the doorstep.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
MIN1 / 6 · 1.52 xG
COL1 / 7 · 1.47 xG
Medium dangermid-range
MIN0 / 15 · 1.64 xG
COL1 / 29 · 3.29 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
MIN1 / 44 · 0.62 xG
COL0 / 44 · 0.60 xG

COL went 1-for-29 from medium danger on 3.29 expected goals — 2.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
MIN
2 G · 3.78 xG · -1.8
COL
3 G · 5.36 xG · -2.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. WallstedtMIN
+3.4
S. WedgewoodCOL
+1.8

MIN finished -1.8 against expected, COL -2.4 — J. Wallstedt (MIN) saved 3.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
MIN
WRIST2/30
SNAP0/5
SLAP0/4
BACKHAND0/8
TIP IN0/3
WRAP AROUND0/0
BETWEEN LEGS0/0
OTHER0/15
COL
WRIST0/20
SNAP1/13
SLAP0/11
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN1/6
WRAP AROUND0/1
BETWEEN LEGS0/1
OTHER0/23
MIN
COL
Off the rush
2 G on 30 · 2.74 xG
2 G on 40 · 3.68 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 5 · 0.81 xG
0 G on 5 · 0.75 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: MIN went 2-for-30, COL 0-for-20. MIN scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
B. Faber
#7 · D · MIN
0 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 28:14 TOI · -1
Q. Hughes
#43 · D · MIN
0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 26:48 TOI · -2
K. Kaprizov
#97 · L · MIN
1 G · 0 A · 4 SOG · 22:41 TOI · -2
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • J. Wallstedt (MIN) stopped 3.4 goals above expected.
  • COL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 40 rush chances.
  • MIN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 30 rush chances.
  • COL created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • MIN created 5 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • COL underperformed xG by 3.4 — wasted quality chances.
  • MIN underperformed xG by 1.8 — wasted quality chances.
  • J. Wallstedt (MIN) saved 3.4 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • S. Wedgewood (COL) saved 1.8 goals above expected — stole the show.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · MIN at COL · 2:00 PM ET

The Avalanche are the model's lean over the Wild — with PDO regression in play

By the ModelJul 12, 6:09 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

57%
COL
Model favorite
43%
57%
MIN50COL

COL by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score MIN 2.42.9 COL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

MIN← edge
edge →COL
52.0%5v5 xG%57.0%
48.0%Corsi%57.0%
2.55xGF / 603.03
2.40xGA / 602.30
2.04Goals for / gm2.63
1.93Goals against / gm1.56
1.007PDO — luck, not skill1.021

COL holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.007 vs 1.021) says COL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

Colorado's expected-goals edge predicts a narrow win. The model projects the Avalanche at 57% probability in a 2.4-to-2.9 goal range, built on territorial control: 57.0% 5v5 xG and 57.0% Corsis to Minnesota's 52.0% and 48.0%. That's the shallowest edge imaginable for a model pick—barely daylight separates the teams.

The catch is regressive pressure. Colorado's PDO sits at 1.021, running hot compared to Minnesota's 1.007. When your shooting percentage and save percentage both run ahead of league average, regression typically arrives. The Avalanche have earned their underlying play, but unsustainable puck luck alone is padding several wins.

Goaltending adds uncertainty. Both S. Wedgewood (Colorado) and F. Gustavsson (Minnesota) are on back-to-back starts, raising the risk of tired play or a backup skip-start. Either scenario tilts unpredictably.

The matchup asymmetry lives with star production. Artturi Lehkonen (1.11 xG/60, 18G 22A, 6 HD goals) and Ross Colton (1.10 xG/60, 7G 15A) anchor Colorado's finish rate—both efficient at creating high-danger looks. Minnesota counters with Matt Boldy (0.89 xG/60, 22G 18A, 5 HD goals), whose power-play-heavy mark (13.7% shooting) inflates goal totals beyond 5v5 performance. Robby Fabbri, marked likely out, would have paired Boldy's production. His absence reshuffles Minnesota's secondary threat level.

Defensive weak points tell the deeper story. Nazem Kadri on Colorado and Matt Kiersted on Minnesota both anchor vulnerability assignments. If Minnesota's penalty kill tightens around Kadri, it erodes Colorado's power advantage. If Colorado's top pair exploits Kiersted, the gap widens.

The verdict hinges on whether Colorado sustains its hot hand or regresses into the fundamentals—the xG margin itself. 57% is not a lock. It's a coin flip with a slight lean, shaped by puck luck that probably won't hold.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

MIN
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Robby Fabbri2G 3A
0.88 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.9% sh
COL
Artturi Lehkonen18G 22A
1.11 xG/60 · 6 HD · 14.9% sh
Ross Colton7G 15A
1.10 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.9% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters