Motion-blurred skater in a Nashville Predators sweater
Breakdown · SEA at NSH

Predators run the Kraken off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Predators earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

SEA 1 · NSH 3
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:55 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Nashville's 3–1 victory understates the Predators' dominance. Both teams underperformed their expected goals—the Predators by 2.46, the Kraken by 2.12—yet Nashville's superior underlying metrics (64% of 5v5 xG, 8 high-danger chances versus 2) meant the result was never truly in doubt.

The Predators commanded 52% of shot attempts and shot with devastating purpose. They generated 0.080 expected goals per shot compared to Seattle's 0.056, a quality gap that revealed itself through relentless net-crashing (4 rebound chances) and purposeful puck movement.

Seattle's J. Daccord mounted a valiant resistance. The goalie stopped 3.46 goals above expected with a 0.926 save percentage—a worthy effort that deserved a tighter margin. For Nashville, J. Annunen (0.962 SV%, +2.12 above expected) closed the door on any Kraken comeback.

Filip Forsberg struck early in the third period with a wrist shot from the wing (18:10), setting the tone. His two-assist evening, paired with goals from R. O'Reilly and an assist from B. Skjei, reflected a night in which the Predators converted while the Kraken could not.

The variance worked against Seattle, but only because Nashville had generated far better opportunities to exploit.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Mar 19
SEA
1
NSH
3

Predators run the Kraken off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 3.1 – 5.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Predators earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
SEA
3.12
NSH
5.46
36% of the chances64%

The board read SEA 1, NSH 3. The chances read SEA 3.1, NSH 5.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
NSH
−2.5
goals above expected
NSH5.46 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
SEA3.12 expected · 1 scored
Expected
Scored

The Kraken left 2.1 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 06:14NSHR. Ufko0–1
  2. P1 18:40SEAF. Gaudreau1–1
  3. P2 07:11NSHR. O'ReillyPP1–2
  4. P3 18:10NSHF. ForsbergEN1–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
SEA
47 shots
1
Final
98 shots
NSH
51 shots
3
SEA attackNSH attack
SEA NSH Goal
47
shots · 1 in
51
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
SEANSH
0 / 2
0.38 xG
High danger
2 / 8
2.77 xG
1 / 18
1.88 xG
Medium
0 / 19
1.96 xG
0 / 36
0.86 xG
Low
1 / 41
0.73 xG

The Predators buried 2 of 8 high-danger looks.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Daccord
+3.5
SEA · 25/27
A
J. Annunen
+2.1
NSH · 25/26
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Predators run the Kraken off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 13–15
  1. 06:14NSHR. Ufko(B. Skjei, F. Forsberg)0–1
  2. 18:40SEAF. Gaudreau(C. Stephenson, K. Kakko)1–1
2ndshots 6–6
  1. 07:11NSHR. O'Reillypower play(F. Forsberg, S. Stamkos)1–2
3rdshots 7–7
  1. 18:10NSHF. Forsbergempty net1–3

score reads SEA–NSH

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
5.46
NSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
−2.5
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.026
NSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
54.8%
Shot attempts
Over half — they had the puck more
Split by club

Who controlled the game

3.12Expected goals5.46
NSH 64% of the chance quality
26Shots on goal28
2High-danger chances8
56All attempts (Corsi)68
Adjusted for score: SEA 48% · NSH 52%
Faceoffs · NSH won37%off47%neu56%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
SEA0 / 2 · 0.38 xG
NSH2 / 8 · 2.77 xG
Medium dangermid-range
SEA1 / 18 · 1.88 xG
NSH0 / 19 · 1.96 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
SEA0 / 36 · 0.86 xG
NSH1 / 41 · 0.73 xG

NSH went 0-for-19 from medium danger on 1.96 expected goals — 2.0 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
SEA
1 G · 3.12 xG · -2.1
NSH
3 G · 5.46 xG · -2.5
0123456

SEA finished -2.1 against expected, NSH -2.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
SEA
WRIST0/32
SNAP0/5
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/1
TIP IN1/5
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/9
NSH
WRIST1/24
SNAP1/8
SLAP1/7
BACKHAND0/7
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/2
BAT0/0
POKE0/1
OTHER0/17
SEA
NSH
Off the rush
1 G on 30
1.95 xG
1 G on 38
3.70 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4
0.63 xG
0 G on 4
0.64 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: SEA went 0-for-32, NSH 1-for-24.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
J. Daccord
SEA · 25/27 · .926
+3.5
saved above expected
A+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger2/82.8+0.8
Medium0/192.0+2.0
Low1/410.7-0.3

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

J. Annunen
NSH · 25/26 · .962
+2.1
saved above expected
A
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/20.4+0.4
Medium1/181.9+0.9
Low0/360.9+0.9

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

98 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
SEA
47 shots
1
Final
98 shots
NSH
51 shots
3
SEA attackNSH attack
SEA NSH Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — SEA left, NSH right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
F. Forsberg
#9 · L · NSH
1 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 18:28 on ice · +1
B. Skjei
#76 · D · NSH
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 26:32 on ice · +1
R. O'Reilly
#90 · C · NSH
1 G · 0 A · 2 SOG · 21:42 on ice
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Thu, Mar 19
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelJul 12, 7:54 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a 2.4–2.6 goal range with Nashville holding a 54% win probability—so close to a pick'em that any conviction here is overconfidence. Nashville's territorial advantage and Seattle's recent form are the only reasons the Predators edge the needle at all.

Start with Corsi, which separates these teams most cleanly: Nashville drives play at 50.0%, Seattle at 45.0%. That territorial tilt translates to puck possession. Nashville's expected-goals share (49.0%) tracks with that control; Seattle's (46.0%) reflects a team playing in the red. Over their last 10 games, Seattle is -6 in goal differential, a stretch that confirms the underlying struggle.

Both teams' shooting luck runs counter to underlying play. Seattle's PDO sits at 1.011, meaning they've scored more than their expected-goals models predict—a gap that won't hold. Nashville's is 0.992, a deficit that should tighten. That's narrative one: PDO arbitrage means Seattle has extracted excess value, and Nashville is due for positive regression.

The goaltending matchup introduces genuine uncertainty. J. Saros and P. Grubauer are both on back-to-backs, which could trigger backup appearances or fatigued starters—the kind of tactical detail that moves tight games.

On the ice, Seattle's offense runs through Shane Wright (0.77 xG/60, 8 goals, 10 assists, 4 high-danger goals, 10.4% shooting) and Berkly Catton (0.68 xG/60, 6 goals, 8 assists, 5 high-danger goals, 8.8% shooting). Both generate dangerous looks at high frequency, and Wright's shooting percentage sits above normal.

Nashville counters with Zachary L'Heureux (0.85 xG/60, 4 goals, 0 assists, 1 high-danger goal, 16.0% shooting) and Filip Forsberg (0.80 xG/60, 23 goals, 17 assists, 4 high-danger goals, 13.6% shooting). L'Heureux is running an unsustainable shooting rate; expect regression. Forsberg is the elite volume scorer.

The tension is simple: Nashville's Corsi edge means they'll control positioning more often, but Seattle's scorers have been efficient. Forsberg's 23 goals represent Nashville's primary elite offensive threat; that's either an edge or a liability if Seattle's defense focuses there. Chandler Stephenson and Jonathan Marchessault become critical on defense because neither team has overwhelming depth.

This is a game where the model knows its limits. Both teams can win. The Predators' underlying play is slightly better; the Kraken's scorers have been sharp. In a 2.4-goal range, either could land on the right side of variance.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NSH 54%
54%
NSH
Model favorite
46%
54%
SEA50NSH

NSH by 8 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score SEA 2.4–2.6 NSH; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
SEA← edge
edge →NSH
46.0%49.0%
45.0%50.0%
2.132.48
2.512.58
1.871.84
1.952.21
1.0110.992

The season numbers split 3–3 — no clear process edge — and the luck row (1.011 vs 0.992) says SEA has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 10
SEA
4-6-0
-6 GD · 1d rest
NSH
4-4-2
+0 GD · 1d rest
1.011
SEA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.992
NSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

Where the edges live
  • The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
Things to watch
  • The Predators drive Corsi at 50.0% — expect territorial tilt.
  • J. Saros is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • P. Grubauer is on a back-to-back — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • The Kraken are underwater at -6 goal differential over their last 10.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
SEA
Expected in goal
P. Grubauer
back-to-back.800 last start
Backup Joey Daccord · -6.2 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

NSH
Expected in goal
J. Saros
back-to-back.923 last start
Backup Juuse Saros · -9.3 GSAx this season
Back-to-back: the backup often gets this one. Treat the starter as unconfirmed.

No completed game on file for this club yet.

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
SEA
Shane Wright8G 10A
0.77 xG/60 · 4 HD · 10.4% sh
Berkly Catton6G 8A
0.68 xG/60 · 5 HD · 8.8% sh
NSH
Zachary L'Heureux4G 0A
0.85 xG/60 · 1 HD · 16.0% sh
Filip Forsberg23G 17A
0.80 xG/60 · 4 HD · 13.6% sh
Keep going

Where to next