Avalanche run the Blackhawks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Avalanche earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Colorado's 4–1 win had a sharp disagreement with its underlying metrics: the Avalanche went 0–9 on high-danger chances while Soderblom stopped all nine. They won instead on rush volume, scoring 4 goals on 34 rush opportunities—a ratio that overwhelmed Chicago's transition defense.
The Blackhawks held 29% of shot attempts and generated 2.72 expected goals, then squandered even that meager share. Blackwood saved 1.72 goals above expected, suffocating Chicago whenever they approached the net with purpose. Colorado paid for their own inefficiency in the slot: they underperformed their 5.25 xG by 1.25 goals, a consequence of Soderblom's near-perfection on high-danger chances. Yet Colorado's relentless rush attacks, combined with 8 rebound opportunities against a scrambling defense, proved unstoppable.
Chicago never escaped the defensive zone long enough to generate sustained offense. Colorado's volume in transition was the deciding factor.
The danger ladder
COL went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.13 expected goals — 2.1 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
COL finished -1.3 against expected, CHI -1.7 — M. Blackwood (COL) saved 1.7 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: COL went 1-for-35, CHI 1-for-20. COL scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- M. Blackwood (COL) stopped 1.7 goals above expected.
- COL couldn't convert — 0/9 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- COL was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 34 rush chances.
- COL created 8 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- CHI underperformed xG by 1.7 — wasted quality chances.
- M. Blackwood (COL) saved 1.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
- A. Soderblom was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 9 high-danger shots.
- COL power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 8 PP shots (0.62 xG).