Penguins edge the Senators in a shootout
The Penguins earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
The Penguins controlled this game—57% of 5v5 expected goals (5.99–4.52)—yet needed a shootout to beat Ottawa 4-3. Pittsburgh created 10 high-danger chances but converted none, underperforming their 5.99 xG by 1.99 goals. Ottawa underperformed its 4.52 xG by 1.52.
Pittsburgh dominated the shot count 40–29 and expected-goal margin at all danger levels. An open game with 19 combined high-danger chances still came down to variance—both teams misfired when it mattered most. Pittsburgh crashed the net effectively but converted 0 of 9 rebound opportunities.
S. Skinner saved 1.52 goals above expected for Pittsburgh (26 saves, 0.897 SV%). L. Ullmark saved 2.99 above expected for Ottawa (37 saves, 0.925 SV%). Ben Kindel's shootout goal broke the stalemate.
Pittsburgh was lethal on the rush: 3 goals on 34 chances. Ottawa: 2 goals on 32.
The danger ladder
PIT went 0-for-10 from high danger on 2.25 expected goals — 2.3 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
PIT finished -2.0 against expected, OTT -1.5 — L. Ullmark (OTT) saved 3.0 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: PIT went 1-for-38, OTT 2-for-19. PIT scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- S. Skinner (PIT) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
- Open game — 19 high-danger chances combined (OTT 9, PIT 10).
- PIT couldn't convert — 0/10 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
- OTT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 32 rush chances.
- PIT was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
- PIT created 9 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- OTT underperformed xG by 1.5 — wasted quality chances.
- PIT underperformed xG by 3.0 — wasted quality chances.
- S. Skinner (PIT) saved 1.5 goals above expected — stole the show.
- L. Ullmark (OTT) saved 3.0 goals above expected — stole the show.