Backcheck
Recap · PHI at DET

Flyers hold off the Red Wings

The Flyers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJul 12, 9:22 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
PHI
Philadelphia Flyers
5
Home
DET
Detroit Red Wings
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.66Expected goals3.72
56% share for the better side
26Shot attempts (SOG)35
9High-danger chances7
47Corsi (all attempts)63
Score-adjusted: 37% / 63%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Detroit controlled shot volume but lacked the punch to convert it. The Flyers won 5-3 despite being outshot 35-26 on goal; Philadelphia commanded 56% of 5v5 expected goals (4.66–3.72), meaning the Red Wings' shot advantage masked an underlying disadvantage.

The schism was one of quality. Detroit generated high-danger chances at a 0.059 xG per shot; Philadelphia's rate was 0.099. Out of 16 combined high-danger chances, Detroit managed only 7—and converted zero. That's unsustainable; the Red Wings couldn't finish.

Goaltending told the story. D. Vladar posted a 0.914 SV% (32/35) that beat expected by 0.72 goals, going 7 for 7 on high-danger attempts. C. Talbot went 4 for 4 for Detroit. J. Gibson faced the bulk of the workload, stopping 17 of 21 (0.810 SV%).

Rush play cut both ways. Philadelphia scored 3 goals on 23 rush chances; Detroit matched that efficiency with 3 on 25 attempts. The edge came elsewhere: Philadelphia's power play was lethal, converting twice on four attempts (1.22 xG), while Detroit couldn't cash in on its high-danger looks.

Sean Couturier's wrist shot from the point (P3, 17:56) served as the turning point—a clinical finish that reflected Philadelphia's ability to make each opportunity count.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
PHI3 / 9 · 3.11 xG
DET0 / 7 · 1.76 xG
Medium dangermid-range
PHI2 / 10 · 1.10 xG
DET2 / 12 · 1.40 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
PHI0 / 28 · 0.44 xG
DET1 / 44 · 0.57 xG

DET went 0-for-7 from high danger on 1.76 expected goals — 1.8 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
PHI
5 G · 4.66 xG · +0.3
DET
3 G · 3.72 xG · -0.7
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
D. VladarPHI
+0.7
J. GibsonDET
-0.1
C. TalbotDET
+0.7

PHI finished +0.3 against expected, DET -0.7 — C. Talbot (DET) saved 0.7 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
PHI
WRIST4/16
SNAP1/13
TIP IN0/3
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
DET
WRIST1/20
SNAP2/19
TIP IN0/4
SLAP0/2
BACKHAND0/0
DEFLECTED0/2
OTHER0/16
PHI
DET
Off the rush
3 G on 23 · 2.26 xG
3 G on 25 · 2.59 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 2 · 0.88 xG
0 G on 4 · 0.68 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: PHI went 4-for-16, DET 1-for-20. PHI scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
O. Tippett
#74 · R · PHI
3 G · 1 A · 7 SOG · 16:38 TOI · +2
M. Seider
#53 · D · DET
0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 28:09 TOI
P. Kane
#88 · R · DET
0 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 20:40 TOI
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • DET had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • Open game — 16 high-danger chances combined (DET 7, PHI 9).
  • PHI had the higher quality looks — 0.099 xG/shot vs 0.059.
  • DET couldn't convert — 0/7 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • DET was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 25 rush chances.
  • PHI was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • DET created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • D. Vladar was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 7 high-danger shots.
  • C. Talbot (DET) saved 4.7 goals above expected — stole the show.
  • PHI power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 4 PP shots (1.22 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · PHI at DET · 8:00 PM ET

Flyers at Red Wings: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 12, 9:20 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
DET
Model favorite
50%
50%
PHI50DET

DET by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PHI 2.42.4 DET; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

PHI← edge
edge →DET
51.0%5v5 xG%49.0%
48.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.38
2.20xGA / 602.50
1.96Goals for / gm1.73
1.82Goals against / gm2.07
1.008PDO — luck, not skill0.985

PHI holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.008 vs 0.985) says PHI has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects a 2.4-2.4 game with the Red Wings at 50% win probability—as close to a pick'em as you'll find.

Philadelphia arrives on the back of a 7-2-1 run over their last 10 games. At even strength, however, Detroit edges out the Flyers on both shot and expected-goal volume: the Red Wings generated 49.0% Corsi and 49.0% xG, while Philadelphia mustered 48.0% Corsi and 51.0% xG. That discrepancy—the Flyers generating slightly more expected goals despite fewer shot attempts—coupled with a PDO of 1.008 versus Detroit's 0.985, suggests Philadelphia has converted above their expected rate. Regression favors Detroit.

J. Gibson starts the second half of a back-to-back, a scheduling burden that can flatten even elite goaltending.

#### Players to Watch

PHI

Owen Tippett produces 0.88 expected goals per 60 minutes with 19 goals and 18 assists on a 12.1% shooting rate, including 2 high-danger goals. Christian Dvorak trails at 0.81 xG/60 but has matched him in offensive impact: 12 goals, 21 assists, and 3 high-danger tallies on 11.2% shooting.

DET

Alex DeBrincat mirrors Tippett's 0.88 xG/60 with 17 goals and 28 assists on 9.0% shooting; 2 of those goals came from high-danger spots. Marco Kasper's 0.81 xG/60 mirrors Dvorak's rate, though his 7 goals and 8 assists on 6.1% shooting, with 1 high-danger goal, shows less conversion.

Christian Dvorak is Philadelphia's defensive weak link; Axel Sandin-Pellikka holds that role for Detroit. Neither team has scored from high-danger chances or rebounds this season. In a game this narrow, whoever breaks that silence first will likely decide it.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

PHI
Owen Tippett19G 18A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.1% sh
Christian Dvorak12G 21A
0.81 xG/60 · 3 HD · 11.2% sh
DET
Alex DeBrincat17G 28A
0.88 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.0% sh
Marco Kasper7G 8A
0.81 xG/60 · 1 HD · 6.1% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters