Kings edge the Blues in overtime
The Kings won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.
The underlying story
Expected goals called this game for the Blues—3.37 to 3.19—yet Los Angeles won 2-1 anyway. The Kings held 52% of shot attempts (26–24 on goal) but the Blues generated more quality chances, a structural advantage that the scoreboard ultimately overruled.
Goaltending decided it. A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 2.37 goals above expected, while J. Binnington (STL) saved 1.19. St. Louis underperformed its xG by 2.37 goals—they got the openings, then couldn't convert. The Kings were efficient: 2 goals on 28 rush chances, converting when it mattered most. High-danger chances finished 5–4 in Los Angeles' favor.
Trevor Moore's snap shot from the slot at 01:56 of overtime was the end of it. Before that: the Blues created 7 rebound opportunities, the Kings 3, neither scoring a second chance.
The danger ladder
STL went 0-for-4 from high danger on 0.92 expected goals — 0.9 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
STL finished -2.4 against expected, LAK -1.2 — A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 2.4 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: STL went 0-for-23, LAK 1-for-21. LAK scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- J. Binnington (STL) stopped 1.2 goals above expected.
- LAK was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 28 rush chances.
- LAK created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- STL created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- STL underperformed xG by 2.4 — wasted quality chances.
- A. Forsberg (LAK) saved 2.4 goals above expected — stole the show.