Backcheck
Recap · CHI at SJS

Sharks hold off the Blackhawks

The Sharks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.49–2.73 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 12, 10:39 AMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CHI
Chicago Blackhawks
2
Home
SJS
San Jose Sharks
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.49Expected goals2.73
56% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)23
7High-danger chances7
51Corsi (all attempts)50
Score-adjusted: 52% / 48%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Chicago controlled 56% of expected goals at 5v5 and lost 3-2. San Jose won despite the quality battle favoring its opponent.

A. Nedeljkovic's goaltending proved decisive. The Sharks' goaltender posted 0.931 SV%, outperforming expected by 1.49 goals; S. Knight managed 0.870. On high-danger chances the teams were even at 7–7. San Jose scored 3 on 23 rush chances; Chicago generated 4 rebound opportunities and converted 1.

Frank Nazar's slap shot from the high slot (P3, 06:09) represented Chicago's clearest chance to tie. W. Eklund (SJS) had 1G, 1A in 15:03. M. Celebrini (SJS) had 1A in 22:05.

How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CHI1 / 7 · 1.55 xG
SJS2 / 7 · 1.42 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CHI1 / 16 · 1.44 xG
SJS0 / 6 · 0.65 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CHI0 / 28 · 0.50 xG
SJS1 / 37 · 0.66 xG

SJS went 0-for-6 from medium danger on 0.65 expected goals — 0.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CHI
2 G · 3.49 xG · -1.5
SJS
3 G · 2.73 xG · +0.3
01234
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
S. KnightCHI
-0.3
A. NedeljkovicSJS
+1.5

CHI finished -1.5 against expected, SJS +0.3 — A. Nedeljkovic (SJS) saved 1.5 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CHI
WRIST1/28
SLAP1/8
BACKHAND0/3
SNAP0/0
TIP IN0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/11
SJS
WRIST1/21
SLAP1/6
BACKHAND0/3
SNAP1/4
TIP IN0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
OTHER0/13
CHI
SJS
Off the rush
1 G on 25 · 2.18 xG
3 G on 23 · 2.46 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 4 · 0.91 xG
0 G on 0 · 0.00 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-28, SJS 1-for-21. SJS scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
F. Nazar
#91 · C · CHI
1 G · 1 A · 6 SOG · 21:35 TOI · +1
W. Eklund
#72 · L · SJS
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 15:03 TOI · +2
M. Celebrini
#71 · C · SJS
0 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:05 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • SJS won despite being outplayed by xG (44%). Goaltending or finishing carried them.
  • A. Nedeljkovic (SJS) stopped 1.5 goals above expected.
  • SJS was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • CHI created 4 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CHI at SJS · 10:00 PM ET

The Sharks are the model's lean over the Blackhawks on the underlying numbers

By the ModelJul 12, 10:37 AMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

57%
SJS
Model favorite
43%
57%
CHI50SJS

SJS by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score CHI 2.42.8 SJS; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CHI← edge
edge →SJS
42.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
46.0%Corsi%47.0%
2.17xGF / 602.33
2.94xGA / 602.56
1.84Goals for / gm1.99
2.41Goals against / gm2.32
0.996PDO — luck, not skill0.998

SJS holds 6 of 6 process categories — and PDO (0.996 vs 0.998) says SJS has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

San Jose holds a 57% win probability in the model's projection of a 2.4-to-2.8-goal game — a meaningful edge built on superior underlying play. The Sharks generate 48.0% of expected goals at 5v5 to Chicago's 42.0%, a gap that translates to shot quality and opportunity creation even if recent results haven't matched. The Sharks' 47.0% Corsi reading slightly outpaces Chicago's 46.0%, reinforcing the pattern.

Both teams stumble into this matchup struggling. San Jose sits −11 in goal differential over its last 10 games; Chicago is worse at −14. Recent performance hasn't reflected the underlying structure — a finding that points to variance clouding the true play patterns, particularly for the Sharks' side.

Goaltending uncertainty clouds both contenders. Y. Askarov faces his second consecutive game on short rest; A. Soderblom does the same for Chicago. Either backup appearance or fatigue from a tired starter could shift the competitive balance. Pregame confirmations matter here.

Chicago's offensive load falls on Tyler Bertuzzi and Connor Bedard. Bertuzzi generates 0.85 expected goals per 60 minutes and has converted at 18.0%, producing 20 goals and 15 assists with 7 high-danger tallies. His output tracks his underlying metrics precisely. Bedard's 0.82 xG/60 sits marginally below Bertuzzi's, but his 11.8% shooting rate stands out — he's posted 17 goals and 27 assists while converting at an unusually low percentage from his opportunities.

San Jose's offense centers on Pavol Regenda at 1.10 xG/60 with 16.1% shooting, though he's likely out with an inactive designation. Igor Chernyshov provides secondary offensive output at 0.91 xG/60 with 6 goals and 8 assists, though he surfaces on San Jose's defensive weak-link list.

Anton Frondell surfaces as Chicago's primary defensive vulnerability. Neither team has registered high-danger or rebound goals at meaningful rates, indicating both defenses are effectively neutralizing secondary chances.

The underlying divergence is clear: Chicago's processes consistently lag. That gap builds confidence in San Jose's model advantage, suggesting the Sharks' 57% projection reflects true structural superiority. Form may reset, but the Sharks' edge in underlying play offers the more reliable path forward.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CHI
Tyler Bertuzzi20G 15A
0.85 xG/60 · 7 HD · 18.0% sh
Connor Bedard17G 27A
0.82 xG/60 · 5 HD · 11.8% sh
SJS
Pavol Regenda5G 1A
1.10 xG/60 · 2 HD · 16.1% sh
Igor Chernyshov6G 8A
0.91 xG/60 · 1 HD · 15.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters