Penguins run the Devils off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Penguins earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
New Jersey's 41 percent shot-attempt share belied the underlying reality—their expected goals totaled 2.47 for a 33 percent split, revealing how much volume masked inferior shot quality. Pittsburgh's efficiency at 0.080 expected goals per attempt versus 0.059 compounded the deficit into the 5-2 final.
The Penguins created eight rebound opportunities with one conversion. The Devils created three with none, illustrating Pittsburgh's edge in net-front positioning. Both teams scored two goals on the rush—an even split in transition—but the underlying advantage proved decisive elsewhere.
E. Chinakhov finished with 1G, 2A in 14:23, leading the night. E. Karlsson added 1G, 1A in 22:30, his wrist shot from the wing in the third period serving as a momentum inflection. E. Malkin chipped in 1G, 1A in 17:13.
J. Allen stopped 25 of 29 shots (0.862 SV%) and posted a plus-1.02 performance versus expected, suggesting he made saves the underlying metrics didn't forecast. S. Skinner turned aside 19 of 21 (0.905 SV%), solid against superior threats.
High-danger chances finished 7–5 in Pittsburgh's favor, crystallizing the pattern: New Jersey generated volume without corresponding danger.
The danger ladder
NJD went 0-for-8 from medium danger on 0.84 expected goals — 0.8 left on the table.
Finishing vs expected
PIT finished -0.0 against expected, NJD -0.5 — J. Allen (NJD) saved 1.0 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: PIT went 3-for-18, NJD 1-for-16. PIT scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
- NJD had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
- J. Allen (NJD) stopped 1.0 goals above expected.
- PIT had the higher quality looks — 0.080 xG/shot vs 0.059.
- NJD was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 21 rush chances.
- PIT was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 23 rush chances.
- NJD created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- PIT created 8 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.