Ducks run the Predators off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Ducks earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
Anaheim's 5-4 win over Nashville looked close, but the underlying numbers told a different story. The Ducks controlled 65% of expected goals (5.06–2.71) and 65% of shot attempts (40–21)—a domination that the scoreline masked.
The Predators finished a goal above their xG expectation—a fortunate variance given their limited offensive volume. Nashville was lethal on the rush, scoring four goals on 21 chances, but this efficiency on one dimension couldn't overcome their overall shot-generation deficit.
High-danger chances finished even at 4–4, a rare symmetry that only underscored the disparity in shot volume and quality. Anaheim's 40 attempts generated more dangerous looks overall; Nashville's power play (2 goals on 11 shots, 0.78 xG) remained their only reliable offensive avenue.
Goaltending variance tilted Nashville's way. V. Husso (ANA) allowed 1.29 goals more than expected, posting a 0.810 save percentage on 21 shots. J. Saros (NSH) was sharp at 35–40 (0.875 SV%), making Nashville's xG overperformance even more remarkable.
Troy Terry's wrist shot from the doorstep in the third period (17:06) finally converted Anaheim's superior shot generation—a fitting climax to a lopsided underlying battle.
The danger ladder
ANA went 3-for-46 from low danger on 0.77 expected goals — 2.2 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
ANA finished -0.1 against expected, NSH +1.3 — V. Husso (ANA) allowed 1.3 more goals than expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: ANA went 2-for-19, NSH 1-for-16. NSH scored 4 of theirs off the rush.
- V. Husso (ANA) gave up 1.3 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
- ANA scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
- NSH was lethal off the rush — 4 goals on 21 rush chances.
- NSH created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- ANA created 8 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
- NSH power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 11 PP shots (0.78 xG).