Motion-blurred skater in a gold and black sweater
Breakdown · NYR at BOS

Bruins shut out the Rangers, 3-0

The verdict · earned

The Bruins earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

NYR 0 · BOS 3
◆ By the ModelOct 2, 5:38 AMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The Bruins shut out the Rangers 3-0. New York generated five scoring chances from the slot but couldn't finish them; J. Swayman was perfect, and Boston's rush attack did the rest.

The Bruins controlled five-on-five expected goals, 4.42 to 3.00. New York finished zero-for-five on high-danger chances—a night that won't repeat often. The Bruins were clinical by contrast: two-for-four in the slot. J. Swayman faced 24 shots and stopped all 24—three goals above what that workload should have allowed.

Boston scored three times off the rush, all in the third period, against 31 rush chances worth 3.93 expected goals. That edge in transition is where the game lived.

F. Minten opened the third from 38 feet off the rush (a six-percent look). J. Peterka added a second from 19 feet (20 percent) at 17:06. M. Kastelic finished into an empty net at 17:29 from 20 feet (97 percent).

I. Shesterkin made 20 saves on 22 shots, 2.42 above expected. M. Lohrei and H. Lindholm each recorded an assist for Boston.

Three Stars

  • #93 F. Minten (BOS) — 1G, 1A in 14:48
  • #6 M. Lohrei (BOS) — 1A in 19:21
  • #27 H. Lindholm (BOS) — 1A in 18:37

The goals

  • BOS 0–1, 16:14 of the third. F. Minten, snap shot from 38 feet, a 6% chance by the model (off the rush), past I. Shesterkin. Assists: M. Lohrei. 5 seconds after a NYR giveaway by V. Gavrikov. Win probability moved 38 points.
  • BOS 0–2, 17:06 of the third. J. Peterka, snap shot from 19 feet, a 20% chance by the model (off the rush), past I. Shesterkin. Assists: E. Lindholm, H. Lindholm. Win probability moved 7 points.
  • BOS 0–3, 17:29 of the third into an empty net. M. Kastelic, snap shot from 20 feet, a 97% chance by the model (off the rush). Assists: F. Minten, M. Khusnutdinov.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Sep 29
NYR
0
BOS
3

Bruins shut out the Rangers, 3-0

Chances 3.0 – 4.4Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Bruins earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
NYR
3.00
BOS
4.42
41% of the chances60%

The board read NYR 0, BOS 3. The chances read NYR 3.0, BOS 4.4.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
BOS
−1.4
goals above expected
BOS4.42 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored
NYR3.00 expected · 0 scored
Expected
Scored

The Rangers left 3.0 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+38
win-probability points
53% → 90% for BOS
BOS 100%the game, start to finish
NYR 100%P1 · P2 · P3
BOSP3 16:14

F. Minten makes it 0–1.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P3 16:14BOSF. Minten6%0–1
  2. P3 17:06BOSJ. Peterka20%0–2
  3. P3 17:29BOSM. KastelicEN97%0–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
NYR
31 shots
0
Final
71 shots
BOS
40 shots
3
NYR attackBOS attack
NYR BOS Goal
31
shots · 0 in
40
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
NYRBOS
0 / 5
1.30 xG
High danger
2 / 4
1.58 xG
0 / 15
1.45 xG
Medium
1 / 27
2.63 xG
0 / 27
0.25 xG
Low
0 / 24
0.21 xG

The Rangers went 0 for 5 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
A+
J. Swayman
+3.0
BOS · 24/24 · 60:00
Best save · a 41% chance, wrist from 4 ft · P3 09:05
B+
I. Shesterkin
+1.4
NYR · 20/22 · 59:23
Best save · a 23% chance, snap from 18 ft · P1 05:30
Best skater on the ice
A+
BOS
F. Minten
C · impact 1.37
14:48
Ice time
1–1
G – A
0.42
Own xG
27%
xG share
Impact · top 4
F. Minten1.4A+
M. Kastelic1.2A+
P. Dorofeyev1.1A+
J. Peterka1.1A
Report card
NYRBOS
OffenseBA+
DefenseFD
TransitionFA+
Special teamsFF
GoaltendingA+A+
DisciplineCC
LuckC-B+
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why BOS won
  1. 01Dangerous off the rush
  2. 02J. Swayman stole it
  3. 03Clinical in the slot
Why NYR lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Cold finishing night
  3. 03Wasted the best looks
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Bruins shut out the Rangers, 3-0

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 5–7no goals
    2ndshots 9–8no goals
      3rdshots 10–8
      1. 16:14BOSF. Minten(M. Lohrei)0–1

        Snap shot from 38 feet, a 6% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past I. Shesterkin. 5s after a NYR giveaway by V. Gavrikov. Win probability moved 38 points.

      2. 17:06BOSJ. Peterka(E. Lindholm, H. Lindholm)0–2

        Snap shot from 19 feet, a 20% chance (off the rush), past I. Shesterkin. Win probability moved 7 points.

      3. 17:29BOSM. Kastelicempty net(F. Minten, M. Khusnutdinov)0–3

        Snap shot from 20 feet, a 97% chance, a near-certain one (off the rush).

      score reads NYR–BOS

      Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
      Process vs result

      The numbers

      XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
      4.42
      BOS chances
      Goals their shots were worth
      −1.4
      Finishing
      Goals below what those chances were worth
      1.054
      BOS puck luck
      Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
      53.9%
      Shot attempts
      Over half — they had the puck more
      Split by club

      Who controlled the game

      3.00Expected goals4.42
      BOS 60% of the chance quality
      24Shots on goal23
      5High-danger chances4
      47All attempts (Corsi)55
      Adjusted for score: NYR 47% · BOS 54%
      Faceoffs · BOS won56%off40%neu53%def
      Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
      How the game was won

      The danger ladder

      shotsgoalsexpected
      High dangerslot & crease
      NYR0 / 5 · 1.30 xG
      BOS2 / 4 · 1.58 xG
      Medium dangermid-range
      NYR0 / 15 · 1.45 xG
      BOS1 / 27 · 2.63 xG
      Low dangerperimeter & point
      NYR0 / 27 · 0.25 xG
      BOS0 / 24 · 0.21 xG

      BOS went 1-for-27 from medium danger on 2.63 expected goals — 1.6 left on the table.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
      The luck layer

      Finishing vs expected

      expectedactual
      NYR
      0 G · 3.00 xG · -3.0
      BOS
      3 G · 4.42 xG · -1.4
      012345

      NYR finished -3.0 against expected, BOS -1.4.

      Source · Backcheck xG model
      Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
      What they shot — and what went in

      Shot diet

      goalsshots
      NYR
      WRIST0/11
      SNAP0/9
      SLAP0/3
      TIP IN0/5
      BACKHAND0/2
      WRAP AROUND0/1
      OTHER0/16
      BOS
      WRIST0/19
      SNAP3/9
      SLAP0/7
      TIP IN0/3
      BACKHAND0/2
      WRAP AROUND0/0
      OTHER0/15
      NYR
      BOS
      Off the rush
      0 G on 20
      1.91 xG
      3 G on 31
      3.93 xG
      Off rebounds
      0 G on 3
      0.75 xG
      0 G on 2
      0.13 xG

      Wrist shots carried the volume: NYR went 0-for-11, BOS 0-for-19. BOS scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

      Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
      New to these numbers?

      Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

      The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

      xG
      Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
      HD
      High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
      Corsi
      Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
      Adj.
      Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
      GSAx
      Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
      PDO
      Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
      Shot by shot

      In the net

      Graded on goals saved above expected
      I. Shesterkin
      NYR · 20/22 · .909
      started · 59:23 · loss
      +1.4
      saved above expected
      B+
      the night
      Attempts faced
      39
      Avg chance faced
      8.9%
      Stopped vs expected
      0.949 vs 0.911
      Rebounds allowed
      2
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger1/30.6-0.4
      Medium1/272.6+1.6
      Low0/90.2+0.2
      Shorthanded0/10.1+0.1
      Tips & deflections0/30.3+0.3
      The save
      23% chance stopped, a snap from 18 ft · P1 05:30
      The one to have back
      6% chance went in, a snap from 38 ft · P3 16:14

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      J. Swayman
      BOS · 24/24 · 1.000
      started · 60:00 · win
      +3.0
      saved above expected
      A+
      the night
      Attempts faced
      31
      Avg chance faced
      9.7%
      Stopped vs expected
      1.000 vs 0.903
      Rebounds allowed
      3
      By dangerG/attxGsaved
      High danger0/51.3+1.3
      Medium0/151.4+1.4
      Low0/110.3+0.3
      Shorthanded0/10.1+0.1
      Tips & deflections0/50.3+0.3
      The save
      41% chance stopped, a wrist from 4 ft · P3 09:05

      A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

      Every skater who dressed

      Who played

      Rated on what they produced and how fast

      Best skater on the ice by our rating: F. Minten (BOS), 14:48 of ice, 1-1, 27% of the expected goals while he was out.

      NYR18 skaters
      SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
      P. DorofeyevR15:490-068A+
      O. BjorkstrandR14:330-067A
      J. MillerC16:120-072A
      B. SchneiderD16:140-073B
      V. GavrikovD19:580-069B
      W. CuylleL15:030-049C
      E. TolvanenR13:560-051C
      A. SmitsD16:540-056C
      A. LafrenièreL18:170-045C
      M. ZibanejadC18:310-040C
      M. RempeC9:490-039D
      A. FoxD18:250-051D
      G. PerreaultR16:200-038D
      J. VelenoC15:570-030D
      S. DurziD23:150-036F
      T. KartyeL13:200-033F
      M. PetterssonD23:080-025F
      N. LabaC12:560-044F
      BOS18 skaters
      SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
      F. MintenC14:481-127A+
      M. KastelicC13:071-039A+
      J. PeterkaR17:091-061A
      H. LindholmD18:370-164A
      E. LindholmC15:590-160A
      C. MittelstadtC14:280-063B
      P. ZachaC15:240-057B
      M. LohreiD19:210-143B
      D. PastrnakR17:320-064B
      S. KuralyC15:010-050B
      M. GeekieC16:180-061C
      W. BorgenD17:430-056C
      M. KhusnutdinovC13:230-123C
      C. CliftonD23:230-036D
      T. JeannotL13:130-050D
      J. AspirotD17:130-043D
      N. ZadorovD21:540-038D
      J. HagensC13:270-019F

      xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

      Scratched, NYR: M. Robertson, S. Morrow, J. Chmelar. Scratched, BOS: C. McAvoy, M. Eyssimont, F. Brunet. Referees Wes McCauley and Furman South; linesmen Scott Cherrey and Julien Fournier.

      Graded against a league-average game

      Report card

      Seven dimensions · A+ to F
      DimensionNYRBOS
      Offense
      ▸Basis

      NYR Created 3.00 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 5 high-danger shots (1.30 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.91 xG).

      BOS Created 4.42 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 4 high-danger shots (1.58 xG) and 31 rush shots (3.93 xG).

      B
      84
      A+
      100
      Defense
      ▸Basis

      NYR Allowed 4.42 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 4 high-danger shots (1.58 xG) and 31 rush shots (3.93 xG).

      BOS Allowed 3.00 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 5 high-danger shots (1.30 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.91 xG).

      F
      43
      D
      66
      Transition
      ▸Basis

      NYR Rush shots 20–31, rush xG 1.91–3.93 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

      BOS Rush shots 31–20, rush xG 3.93–1.91 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

      F
      49
      A+
      100
      Special teams
      ▸Basis

      NYR 0-for-1 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.06 PP xG.

      BOS 0-for-1 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.06 PP xG.

      F
      50
      F
      50
      Goaltending
      ▸Basis

      NYR +2.42 goals saved above expected on 22 shots against.

      BOS +3.00 goals saved above expected on 24 shots against.

      A+
      99
      A+
      100
      Discipline
      ▸Basis

      NYR Took 1 penalties for 2 PIM vs 1 for 2 on the other side.

      BOS Took 1 penalties for 2 PIM vs 1 for 2 on the other side.

      C
      75
      C
      75
      Luck

      Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

      ▸Basis

      NYR Finishing -3.00 goals vs xG plus +2.42 GSAx of save luck = -0.58 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

      BOS Finishing -1.42 goals vs xG plus +3.00 GSAx of save luck = +1.58 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

      C-
      70
      B+
      88
      Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
      What the model flagged
      WARNINGNYR

      Rush defense leaked all night

      Gave up 31 rush shots worth 3.93 xG (3 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

      Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

      STRENGTHBOS

      Dangerous off the rush

      3 goals on 31 rush shots worth 3.93 xG.

      STRENGTHBOS

      J. Swayman stole it

      J. Swayman stopped 24 of 24 (1.000) — +3.00 goals saved above expected in a 3-goal game.

      STRENGTHNYR

      I. Shesterkin stole it

      I. Shesterkin stopped 20 of 22 (0.909) — +2.42 goals saved above expected in a 3-goal game.

      LUCKNYR

      Cold finishing night

      Scored 0 on 3.00 xG — -3.00 vs expected. The looks were there; the finish will come back.

      STRENGTHBOS

      Clinical in the slot

      2 goals on 4 high-danger shots (50% conversion on 1.58 xG).

      71 shots · press play to watch the game back

      Where the shots came from

      NHL play-by-play coordinates
      NYR
      31 shots
      0
      Final
      71 shots
      BOS
      40 shots
      3
      NYR attackBOS attack
      NYR BOS Goal

      Each club shoots toward its own end — NYR left, BOS right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

      Ranked from the box score

      Three stars

      Points first
      Three stars · computed, not voted
      F. Minten
      #93 · C · BOS
      1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 14:48 on ice · +2
      M. Lohrei
      #6 · D · BOS
      0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 19:21 on ice · +1
      H. Lindholm
      #27 · D · BOS
      0 G · 1 A · 0 SOG · 18:37 on ice · +2
      Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
      What the model said beforehand

      Before the game

      Written Tue, Sep 29
      Open the pre-game read
      Written from the numbers

      The read

      Edited for clarity
      ◆ By the ModelSep 29, 9:56 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

      This is a true toss-up: the model projects a 3.1 - 3.2 game with the Bruins at 51% win probability. The matchup will turn on whether David Pastrnak and Morgan Geekie can overwhelm a Rangers defense that's struggling to contain threats around the net.

      David Pastrnak drives the Bruins offense: 16 goals, 71 assists, and 1.12 expected goals per 60 minutes. Morgan Geekie has led the league with 23 goals despite shooting at 12.7%, generating chances at 1.05 expected goals per 60. The Rangers counter with Will Cuylle generating 0.99 expected goals per 60 with 10 goals and 11 high-danger goals, while J.T. Miller clicks at 0.97 per 60 despite a modest 5.6% shooting rate.

      The Bruins' primary defensive assignment is shutting down Cuylle, who has drawn 31 high-danger shots this season. Boston will need to collapse the slot—the Bruins score 43% of their goals from high-danger areas and are vulnerable to the same tactic on their end.

      I. Shesterkin has posted a +18.8 goals saved above expected across 51 games with a 91.2% save percentage. J. Swayman carries a larger buffer at +23.5 across 55 games but sits at 90.8%—Swayman has been the steadier hand, though both are playing well above league average.

      The season tells a close story: the Rangers hold 47.5% of expected goals and 48.6% of shot attempts at even strength; Boston counters with 46.7% and 49.0%. The Bruins are running a PDO of 1.022, suggesting regression is due. The Rangers sit at 1.009, closer to sustainable. Neither team's peripherals suggest a blowout—this is a game where execution and goaltending will decide it.

      Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.

      What the model said beforehand

      The model's lean

      BOS 51%
      51%
      BOS
      Model favorite
      49%
      51%
      NYR50BOS

      BOS by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYR 3.1–3.2 BOS; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

      Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
      Season rates · 5v5

      Tale of the tape

      NHL stats API · our xG
      NYR← edge
      edge →BOS
      47.5%46.7%
      48.6%49.0%
      2.872.97
      3.183.39
      2.873.27
      3.043.01
      1.0091.022

      BOS holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.009 vs 1.022) says BOS has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

      Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
      Form · No games yet
      NYR
      0-0-0
      +0 GD · 0d rest
      BOS
      0-0-0
      +0 GD · 0d rest
      1.009
      NYR PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      1.022
      BOS PDO
      Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
      What decides it

      Keys to the game

      TACTICALBOS

      Shutdown Assignment: Bruins

      Highest individual xG/60 on NYR. Gets 31 HD shots. Limit slot access.

      Key matchup: Neutralize Will Cuylle (10G, 0.99 xG/60, 11 HD goals)

      STRENGTHBOS

      David Pastrnak drives the Bruins offense

      David Pastrnak: 16G 71A, 1.12 xG/60, 8 high-danger goals.

      WARNINGNYR

      Exploitable minutes: Gabe Perreault

      Gabe Perreault is on ice for 2.36 xGA/60 and 50 high-danger shots against this season.

      Hunt matchups against Gabe Perreault's shifts with the top line.

      WARNINGBOS

      Exploitable minutes: Jonathan Aspirot

      Jonathan Aspirot is on ice for 2.38 xGA/60 and 65 high-danger shots against this season.

      Hunt matchups against Jonathan Aspirot's shifts with the top line.

      Regression watch
      • The Bruins' PDO is 1.022 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Things to watch
      • Goalie matchup: I. Shesterkin (+18.8 GSAx in 51 GP, 91.2% SV) vs J. Swayman (+23.5 GSAx in 55 GP, 90.8% SV).
      • The Bruins' PDO is 1.022 — running hot, expect some regression.
      Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

      Lineups

      NHL box score
      NYR
      preseason · vs NYI · Fri, Sep 25
      Expected in goal
      I. Shesterkin
      3 days rest.938 last start59:54 played
      Backup Jonathan Quick · -2.5 GSAx this season
      Forwards · 12
      • J. Miller15:02
      • A. Lafrenière15:33
      • P. Dorofeyev16:04
      • E. Tolvanen14:38
      • T. Kartye17:02
      • O. Bjorkstrand13:05
      • N. Laba14:29
      • W. Cuylle14:44
      • M. Rempe13:43
      • J. Veleno16:59
      • M. Zibanejad14:57
      • G. Perreault12:51
      Defence · 6
      • B. Schneider16:42
      • S. Durzi21:17
      • A. Fox17:53
      • M. Pettersson22:14
      • V. Gavrikov20:35
      • A. Smits18:18
      BOS
      preseason · vs WSH · Fri, Sep 25
      Expected in goal
      J. Swayman
      3 days rest.914 last start60:11 played
      Backup Joonas Korpisalo · -2.7 GSAx this season
      Forwards · 12
      • J. Peterka18:41
      • C. Mittelstadt14:20
      • P. Zacha16:52
      • E. Lindholm17:05
      • M. Geekie14:55
      • J. Hagens13:55
      • M. Kastelic11:38
      • D. Locmelis11:38
      • T. Jeannot11:02
      • D. Pastrnak19:31
      • M. Khusnutdinov12:55
      • F. Minten18:27
      Defence · 6
      • M. Lohrei16:56
      • W. Borgen21:12
      • H. Lindholm21:04
      • J. Aspirot15:19
      • C. Clifton21:02
      • N. Zadorov19:11

      Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

      Computed danger · scouting

      Players to watch

      NHL stats API · our xG
      NYR
      Will Cuylle10G 18A
      0.99 xG/60 · 11 HD · 6.4% sh
      J.T. Miller8G 36A
      0.97 xG/60 · 6 HD · 5.6% sh
      BOS
      David Pastrnak16G 71A
      1.12 xG/60 · 8 HD · 6.1% sh
      Morgan Geekie23G 29A
      1.05 xG/60 · 5 HD · 12.7% sh
      Keep going

      Where to next