Backcheck
Pick club
Motion-blurred skater in a Anaheim Ducks sweater
← Fri, Oct 2 · the slate
Breakdown · ANA at VGK

Ducks steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

FinalFri, Oct 2
ANAAnaheim Ducks4VGKVegas Golden Knights3
The verdict · stolen

The Ducks stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 2.42–3.46 and won anyway.

ANA 4 · VGK 3
◆ By the ModelOct 3, 12:51 AMxG: xgboost-0.765Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Anaheim scored four straight goals in the first two periods—B. Sennecke off the rush, A. Killorn on a tip, J. Malott on a deflection, and L. Carlsson on the rebound—and led 4-0 through two. Vegas scored three in the third but fell short, losing 4-3.

The Ducks won a game they had no right to win. Vegas controlled 59% of expected goals at 5v5, 3.46–2.42—a decisive advantage that Anaheim's hot hand and perfect goaltending turned into a steal.

L. Dostal was perfect on high-danger chances. The Ducks gave up six: Dostal stopped all six. Vegas got two high-danger goals past C. Hart on six chances—T. Hertl on the power play in the third and B. Bowman with a rebound late, both off the rush. Hart let in 1.58 more goals than his workload should have allowed.

Vegas was lethal off the rush—two goals on 31 rush chances. Anaheim matched that with two goals on 20 rush chances, and crashed the net hard enough to generate five rebound opportunities. That finishing, whether luck or craft, was the difference. Vegas held 60% of shot attempts (30–20) but couldn't convert. The Golden Knights owned the play every way—and still nearly tied it.

The Ducks' steal came against the run of play—a 41% expected-goals night where perfect positioning and execution turned Vegas's dominance into a loss. The Golden Knights will remember those six high-danger chances. Anaheim didn't care: they took the points.

Three Stars

  • J. Eichel (VGK) — 2A in 22:07
  • L. Carlsson (ANA) — 1G, 1A in 17:43
  • J. LaCombe (ANA) — 1A in 29:37

The goals

  • ANA 1–0, 19:52 of the first. B. Sennecke, wrist shot from 17 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past C. Hart. Assists: L. Carlsson, T. Luneau. 6 seconds after a VGK blocked shot by T. Luneau. Win probability moved 19 points.
  • ANA 2–0, 01:33 of the second. A. Killorn, tip-in from 22 feet, a 5% chance by the model (off the rush), past C. Hart. Assists: N. Warren, M. Granlund. Win probability moved 15 points.
  • ANA 3–0, 02:28 of the second. J. Malott, deflection from 14 feet, a 10% chance by the model, past C. Hart. Assists: T. Washe, J. LaCombe. 4 seconds after an ANA faceoff win by T. Washe. Win probability moved 9 points.
  • ANA 4–0, 07:03 of the second. L. Carlsson, snap shot from 13 feet, a 19% chance by the model (a rebound), past C. Hart. Assists: A. Greer, C. Gauthier. 2 seconds after an ANA shot by A. Greer.
  • VGK 4–1, 04:38 of the third. S. Theodore, snap shot from 33 feet, a 6% chance by the model (off the rush), past L. Dostal. Assists: B. Howden, J. Eichel.
  • VGK 4–2, 06:07 of the third on the power play. T. Hertl, wrist shot from 8 feet, a 14% chance by the model (off the rush), past L. Dostal. Assists: M. Marner, J. Eichel. Win probability moved 5 points.
  • VGK 4–3, 17:10 of the third. B. Bowman, wrist shot from 9 feet, a 12% chance by the model (a rebound), past L. Dostal. Assists: V. Olofsson, B. McNabb. 3 seconds after a VGK missed shot by V. Olofsson. Win probability moved 9 points.

What the numbers can't tell you. Whether the finishing was luck or skill, why the benches were run the way they were, who was hurt, and anything said in the room. That is the beat's story, and it is worth reading.

The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 2
ANA
4
VGK
3

Ducks steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

Chances 2.4 – 3.5Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Golden Knights deserved better.

Expected goals · chance value
ANA
2.42
VGK
3.46
41% of the chances59%

The board read ANA 4, VGK 3. The chances read ANA 2.4, VGK 3.5.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
ANA
+1.6
goals above expected
ANA2.42 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
VGK3.46 expected · 3 scored
Expected
Scored

The Ducks scored 1.6 more than their chances were worth. That does not repeat.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
The swing
+19
win-probability points
47% → 65% for ANA
VGK 100%the game, start to finish
ANA 100%P1 · P2 · P3
ANAP1 19:52

B. Sennecke makes it 1–0.

In-game win model · fitted on 5,248 games
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 19:52ANAB. Sennecke14%1–0
  2. P2 01:33ANAA. Killorn5%2–0
  3. P2 02:28ANAJ. Malott10%3–0
  4. P2 07:03ANAL. Carlsson19%4–0
  5. P3 04:38VGKS. Theodore6%4–1
  6. P3 06:07VGKT. HertlPP14%4–2
  7. P3 17:10VGKB. Bowman12%4–3
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
ANA
32 shots
4
Final
77 shots
VGK
45 shots
3
ANA attackVGK attack
ANA VGK Goal
32
shots · 4 in
45
shots · 3 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
ANAVGK
1 / 2
0.37 xG
High danger
0 / 6
1.34 xG
2 / 15
1.75 xG
Medium
3 / 17
1.72 xG
1 / 30
0.29 xG
Low
0 / 43
0.40 xG

The Golden Knights went 0 for 6 from the slot.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B
L. Dostal
+0.5
ANA · 27/30 · 60:00
Best save · a 32% chance, deflected from 6 ft · P2 18:12
F
C. Hart
−1.6
VGK · 16/20 · 57:40
Best save · a 19% chance, wrist from 7 ft · P3 12:45
Best skater on the ice
A+
VGK
T. Hertl
C · impact 1.90
17:23
Ice time
1–0
G – A
1.00
Own xG
80%
xG share
Impact · top 4
T. Hertl1.9A+
L. Carlsson1.9A+
J. Eichel1.6A+
S. Theodore1.6A
Report card
ANAVGK
OffenseCA
DefenseFC+
TransitionFA+
Special teamsFA-
GoaltendingB-F
DisciplineC-B-
LuckA-F
Seven dimensions, A+ to F · basis on the breakdown
Why it went the way it went
Why ANA won
  1. 01Won against the run of play
  2. 02Dangerous off the rush
  3. 03L. Dostal was perfect on high danger
Why VGK lost
  1. 01Rush defense leaked all night
  2. 02Deserved a better fate
  3. 03Wasted the best looks
Our storyline model · reasoning on the breakdown
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Ducks steal one from the Golden Knights against the run of play

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 12 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 7–8
  1. 19:52ANAB. Sennecke(L. Carlsson, T. Luneau)1–0

    Wrist shot from 17 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past C. Hart. 6s after a VGK block. Win probability moved 19 points.On the ice: J. Caulfield, J. LaCombe, J. Malott, T. Mitchell, T. Washe · against N. Dowd, I. Barbashev, N. Hanifin, J. Lauzon, M. Gatcomb

2ndshots 7–9
  1. 01:33ANAA. Killorn(N. Warren, M. Granlund)2–0

    Tip-in from 22 feet, a 5% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past C. Hart. Win probability moved 15 points.On the ice: F. Vatrano, R. Poehling, N. Nesterenko, T. Hinds, N. Warren · against T. Hertl, V. Olofsson, N. Hanifin, J. Lauzon, T. Connelly

  2. 02:28ANAJ. Malott(T. Washe, J. LaCombe)3–0

    Deflection from 14 feet, a 10% chance, past C. Hart. 4s after an ANA faceoff win by T. Washe. Win probability moved 9 points.On the ice: J. Caulfield, J. LaCombe, J. Malott, T. Luneau, T. Washe · against N. Dowd, R. Andersson, P. Wotherspoon, M. Gatcomb, B. Bowman

  3. 07:03ANAL. Carlsson(A. Greer, C. Gauthier)4–0

    Snap shot from 13 feet, a 19% chance (a rebound), past C. Hart. 2s after an ANA shot by A. Greer.On the ice: A. Killorn, M. Granlund, J. LaCombe, T. Luneau, B. Sennecke · against M. Stone, I. Barbashev, R. Andersson, J. Eichel, P. Wotherspoon

3rdshots 6–13
  1. 04:38VGKS. Theodore(B. Howden, J. Eichel)4–1

    Snap shot from 33 feet, a 6% chance, a shot that rarely goes in (off the rush), past L. Dostal.On the ice: M. Stone, T. Hertl, S. Theodore, J. Eichel, M. Marner · against M. Granlund, P. Mintyukov, T. Mitchell, T. Washe

  2. 06:07VGKT. Hertlpower play(M. Marner, J. Eichel)4–2

    Wrist shot from 8 feet, a 14% chance (off the rush), past L. Dostal. Win probability moved 5 points.

  3. 17:10VGKB. Bowman(V. Olofsson, B. McNabb)4–3

    Wrist shot from 9 feet, a 12% chance (a rebound), past L. Dostal. 3s after a VGK miss by V. Olofsson. Win probability moved 9 points.

score reads ANA–VGK

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
2.42
ANA chances
Goals their shots were worth
+1.6
Finishing
Goals above what those chances were worth
1.040
ANA puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
41.6%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

2.42Expected goals3.46
VGK 59% of the chance quality
20Shots on goal30
2High-danger chances6
47All attempts (Corsi)66
Adjusted for score: ANA 36% · VGK 64%
Faceoffs · VGK won80%off59%neu50%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
ANA1 / 2 · 0.37 xG
VGK0 / 6 · 1.34 xG
Medium dangermid-range
ANA2 / 15 · 1.75 xG
VGK3 / 17 · 1.72 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
ANA1 / 30 · 0.29 xG
VGK0 / 43 · 0.40 xG

VGK went 0-for-6 from high danger on 1.34 expected goals — 1.3 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
ANA
4 G · 2.42 xG · +1.6
VGK
3 G · 3.46 xG · -0.5
012345

ANA finished +1.6 against expected, VGK -0.5.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
ANA
WRIST1/11
SNAP1/12
BACKHAND0/5
TIP IN1/3
SLAP0/0
DEFLECTED1/1
BAT0/0
OTHER0/15
VGK
WRIST2/22
SNAP1/8
BACKHAND0/4
TIP IN0/4
SLAP0/5
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
OTHER0/21
ANA
VGK
Off the rush
2 G on 20
1.51 xG
2 G on 31
3.14 xG
Off rebounds
1 G on 5
0.60 xG
1 G on 2
0.12 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: ANA went 1-for-11, VGK 2-for-22. ANA scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Dostal
ANA · 27/30 · .900
started · 60:00 · win
+0.5
saved above expected
B
the night
Attempts faced
45
Avg chance faced
7.7%
Stopped vs expected
0.933 vs 0.923
Rebounds allowed
2 · 1 scored on
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/61.3+1.3
Medium3/171.7-1.3
Low0/220.4+0.4
Shorthanded1/91.2+0.2
Tips & deflections0/50.6+0.6
The save
32% chance stopped, a deflected from 6 ft · P2 18:12
The one to have back
6% chance went in, a snap from 33 ft · P3 04:38

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

C. Hart
VGK · 16/20 · .800
started · 57:40 · loss
-1.6
saved above expected
F
the night
Attempts faced
31
Avg chance faced
7.8%
Stopped vs expected
0.871 vs 0.922
Rebounds allowed
5 · 1 scored on
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/20.4-0.6
Medium2/151.8-0.3
Low1/140.3-0.7
Shorthanded0/40.3+0.3
Tips & deflections2/40.2-1.8
The save
19% chance stopped, a wrist from 7 ft · P3 12:45
The one to have back
5% chance went in, a tip-in from 22 ft · P2 01:33

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

Every skater who dressed

Who played

Rated on what they produced and how fast

Best skater on the ice by our rating: T. Hertl (VGK), 17:23 of ice, 1-0, 80% of the expected goals while he was out.

ANA18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
L. CarlssonC17:431-159A+
A. GreerL13:240-155A
A. KillornL15:141-078B
B. SenneckeR18:051-076B
C. GauthierL17:510-159B
J. MalottL10:391-039B
T. LuneauD26:580-155B
J. LaCombeD29:370-157B
N. WarrenD9:330-130C
T. WasheC16:030-121C
M. GranlundC18:390-146C
R. PoehlingC14:030-054C
N. NesterenkoC11:490-054D
F. VatranoR10:340-049D
T. HindsD9:150-049D
J. CaulfieldR13:170-042D
T. MitchellD20:380-041F
P. MintyukovD21:090-033F
VGK18 skaters
SkaterTOIG-AxG%Grade
T. HertlC17:231-080A+
J. EichelC22:070-254A+
S. TheodoreD24:401-069A
B. HowdenC14:580-153A
B. BowmanR12:021-048A
V. OlofssonL13:130-164A
M. MarnerR22:220-166B
B. McNabbD17:570-153C
W. KarlssonC20:130-066C
M. StoneR20:390-057C
T. ConnellyL10:300-060C
R. AnderssonD19:140-052D
N. DowdC8:240-039D
P. WotherspoonD15:390-046D
M. GatcombC7:330-039D
N. HanifinD19:340-023F
J. LauzonD16:490-020F
I. BarbashevL15:030-05F

xG% = share of expected goals while on the ice · PD/PT = penalties drawn / taken · “in N min” = a per-60 rate far above the raw total. Impact = 0.75 G + 0.7 A1 + 0.55 A2 + 0.075 SOG + 0.05 BLK + 0.15 penalties drawn − 0.15 taken + 0.01 faceoff wins − 0.01 losses + 0.3 individual xG + 0.5 on-ice xG for − 0.5 on-ice xG against. Rating = 65% impact + 35% impact per 60, as a percentile among the skaters in this game.

Scratched, ANA: N. Jensen, S. Colangelo, N. Klepov. Scratched, VGK: D. Coghlan, R. Lavoie. Referees Thomas John Luxmore and Stephen Hiff; linesmen Jonny Murray and Dan Kelly.

Graded against a league-average game

Report card

Seven dimensions · A+ to F
DimensionANAVGK
Offense
▸Basis

ANA Created 2.42 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 2 high-danger shots (0.37 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.51 xG).

VGK Created 3.46 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; 6 high-danger shots (1.34 xG) and 31 rush shots (3.14 xG).

C
73
A
93
Defense
▸Basis

ANA Allowed 3.46 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 6 high-danger shots (1.34 xG) and 31 rush shots (3.14 xG).

VGK Allowed 2.42 xG against a ~2.70 league-average game; conceded 2 high-danger shots (0.37 xG) and 20 rush shots (1.51 xG).

F
57
C+
77
Transition
▸Basis

ANA Rush shots 20–31, rush xG 1.51–3.14 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

VGK Rush shots 31–20, rush xG 3.14–1.51 (rush-based; public data has no zone entries).

F
53
A+
97
Special teams
▸Basis

ANA 0-for-2 on the power play (0%; league ≈21%) with 0.32 PP xG.

VGK 1-for-3 on the power play (33%; league ≈21%) with 0.66 PP xG.

F
54
A-
90
Goaltending
▸Basis

ANA +0.46 goals saved above expected on 30 shots against.

VGK -1.58 goals saved above expected on 20 shots against.

B-
80
F
59
Discipline
▸Basis

ANA Took 3 penalties for 6 PIM vs 2 for 4 on the other side.

VGK Took 2 penalties for 4 PIM vs 3 for 6 on the other side.

C-
70
B-
80
Luck

Grades bounces, not skill — C is neutral

▸Basis

ANA Finishing +1.58 goals vs xG plus +0.46 GSAx of save luck = +2.04 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

VGK Finishing -0.46 goals vs xG plus -1.58 GSAx of save luck = -2.04 total. This grades luck, not skill — C is neutral, A is very lucky.

A-
91
F
59
Source · NHL play-by-play · xG engine · luck graded separately
What the model flagged
WARNINGANA

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 31 rush shots worth 3.14 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

STRENGTHVGK

Dangerous off the rush

2 goals on 31 rush shots worth 3.14 xG.

SURPRISEANA

Won against the run of play

The Ducks took it 4-3 with only 41% of expected goals (2.42–3.46).

WARNINGVGK

Rush defense leaked all night

Gave up 20 rush shots worth 1.51 xG (2 goals) — transition gaps were there every period.

Tighten neutral-zone structure and keep D gaps closed on entries.

LUCKVGK

Wasted the best looks

0-for-6 on high-danger chances worth 1.34 xG — that conversion rate won't stay at zero.

STRENGTHANA

Dangerous off the rush

2 goals on 20 rush shots worth 1.51 xG.

77 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
ANA
32 shots
4
Final
77 shots
VGK
45 shots
3
ANA attackVGK attack
ANA VGK Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — ANA left, VGK right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
J. Eichel
#9 · C · VGK
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 22:07 on ice
L. Carlsson
#91 · C · ANA
1 G · 1 A · 1 SOG · 17:43 on ice · +1
J. LaCombe
#2 · D · ANA
0 G · 1 A · 2 SOG · 29:37 on ice · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Fri, Oct 2
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelOct 2, 12:10 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

Vegas is favored to edge Anaheim 3.0 to 3.5. The Golden Knights carry 57% win probability, built on rest: the Ducks arrive after five days off; Vegas has only two. That margin compounds in third periods when legs tire.

Vegas has controlled play at 5-on-5 this season. They've generated 66.4% of expected goals, a rate signaling elite offensive generation. The team's 54.7% share of shot attempts confirms it: Vegas spends more time with the puck outside even score. Vegas's 1.006 puck luck factor shows they've caught few early bounces; the early season hasn't inflated their totals.

L. Dostal starts for the Ducks. C. Hart takes the crease for Vegas, where he's saved 0.2 more goals than expected through one game. His 92.3% save percentage backs the early read.

Both offenses hunt the slot. Anaheim has four goals from that zone on 30 attempts (13%). Vegas has seven on 49 attempts (14%). Whoever controls the slot likely controls the scoreboard.

Vegas's edge is narrow but consistent: rest, efficiency, and a marginal goaltending advantage align.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

VGK 57%
57%
VGK
Model favorite
43%
57%
ANA50VGK

VGK by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score ANA 3.0–3.5 VGK; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
Form · Last 0–1
ANA
0-0-0
+0 GD · 5d rest
VGK
1-0-0
+3 GD · 2d rest
1.000
ANA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
1.006
VGK PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

TACTICALANA

Rest edge

The Ducks come in on 5 days of rest; the other side on 2.

Push the pace early against tired legs.

TACTICALANA

Hot Zone: Ducks

Their most productive scoring zone over last 5 games.

Most goals from slot (4G on 30 shots, 13%) — deny that lane

TACTICALVGK

Hot Zone: Golden Knights

Their most productive scoring zone over last 5 games.

Most goals from slot (7G on 49 shots, 14%) — deny that lane

TACTICALANA

L. Dostal was beatable last time out

L. Dostal stopped just 70.0% in his last start.

Things to watch
  • Goalie matchup: L. Dostal vs C. Hart (+0.2 GSAx in 1 GP, 92.3% SV).
  • The Ducks have 3 more days of rest.
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
ANA
preseason · vs LAK · Sat, Sep 26
Expected in goal
L. Dostal
5 days rest.700 last start60:00 played
Forwards · 12
  • N. Nesterenko10:21
  • A. Killorn16:06
  • R. Poehling13:59
  • J. Caulfield13:39
  • N. Klepov14:22
  • T. Washe12:04
  • B. Sennecke17:41
  • N. Myatovic14:25
  • C. Gauthier17:18
  • M. Granlund17:04
  • F. Vatrano12:18
  • L. Carlsson17:41
Defence · 6
  • J. LaCombe23:10
  • N. Jensen17:48
  • T. Mitchell19:09
  • S. Solberg18:03
  • T. Hinds19:34
  • T. Luneau19:24
VGK
vs CHI · Tue, Sep 29
Expected in goal
C. Hart
2 days rest.923 last start59:57 played
Forwards · 12
  • J. Eichel18:00
  • M. Gatcomb10:31
  • B. Howden17:16
  • T. Connelly11:22
  • N. Dowd12:37
  • B. Bowman10:58
  • T. Hertl15:45
  • I. Barbashev14:27
  • M. Stone17:11
  • W. Karlsson17:26
  • M. Marner21:21
  • V. Olofsson13:57
Defence · 6
  • B. McNabb18:45
  • R. Andersson18:46
  • J. Lauzon17:20
  • N. Hanifin18:51
  • S. Theodore21:22
  • P. Wotherspoon20:08

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Keep going

Where to next

Back to the front page