Motion-blurred skater in a Utah Mammoth sweater
Preview · PIT at UTA

The Mammoth are the model's lean over the Penguins on the underlying numbers

Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelOct 19, 9:01 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model is leaning Utah, and the case is about how the Mammoth have been playing, not how their results look. Utah has been the better team at the part of hockey that produces goals, and that is the edge the model is betting on. Goaltending is the one place where Utah looks exposed, which makes this a lean rather than a lock.

The model gives Utah a 57% win probability. Most of that rests on expected goals, the model's estimate of how likely each shot was to become a goal. Utah has taken 58.4% of the expected goals at 5-on-5 this season, and Pittsburgh sits below half at 49.3%.

Utah also takes more of the shot attempts, 56.2% of them, which the model reads as territorial tilt. Expect the Mammoth to spend more of the night in the attacking zone. Form points the same way: Utah is 6-3-0 through nine games, the hotter team on points pace.

The soft spot is in goal. K. Vejmelka's save percentage was 70.6% in his last start, a game the model reads as one he was beatable in. S. Murashov has given up more goals than his shots should have allowed, at -0.6 goals saved above expected across four games. K. Vejmelka is weaker by that measure, at -2.4 over eight games, though their raw save percentages sit close together.

The model's case is the underlying work. If it goes wrong, the goaltending is where it will show first.

Data: NHL API, Backcheck xG model

Live from the league

The game, as it happens

Puck drop 9:00 PM ET

Once the puck drops, every goal and every shot lands here as it happens — the scorer, the clock, and the shot map with the replay — straight from the league's feed. The desk writes the recap after the final horn.

Win probability

The model's lean

UTA 57%
57%
UTA
Model favorite
43%
57%
PIT50UTA

UTA by 14 points of win probability — a modest lean. Projected score PIT 3.1–3.5 UTA; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
New to these numbers?

This is a preview, so every number on it is about form and rates — what each club has been doing, not what it will do tonight.

The strip above is the model's lean, built from each side's chance creation and prevention, goaltending, rest and home ice. It is not a betting line and nobody here is telling you to wager on it. Full glossary →

Win prob
How often this matchup ends in a win for that club, over many simulated tries. It is a lean, not a prediction — 60% teams lose plenty.
xGF/60
Expected goals a club creates per sixty minutes of play — its scoring-chance rate, independent of how many games it has played.
xGA/60
The same rate for chances it gives up. Lower is better.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge that drifts back toward 1.000. Well above it flags a club that has been running hot.
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
PIT← edge
edge →UTA
49.3%58.4%
52.0%56.2%
3.283.75
3.382.67
3.113.67
3.563.00
0.9850.990

UTA holds 6 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (0.985 vs 0.990) says UTA has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · Last 9
PIT
3-5-1
-4 GD · 1d rest
UTA
6-3-0
+6 GD · 1d rest
0.985
PIT PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.990
UTA PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

TACTICAL

The Mammoth own the underlying play

The Mammoth own the underlying play — 58.4% 5v5 xG vs 49.3%.

TACTICAL

The Mammoth drive Corsi at 56.2%

The Mammoth drive Corsi at 56.2% — expect territorial tilt.

TACTICALUTA

K. Vejmelka was beatable last time out

K. Vejmelka stopped just 70.6% in his last start.

TACTICALPIT

S. Murashov was beatable last time out

S. Murashov stopped just 73.7% in his last start.

Where the edges live
  • The Mammoth own the underlying play — 58.4% 5v5 xG vs 49.3%.
  • The Mammoth drive Corsi at 56.2% — expect territorial tilt.
Things to watch
  • The Mammoth own the underlying play — 58.4% 5v5 xG vs 49.3%.
  • The Mammoth drive Corsi at 56.2% — expect territorial tilt.
  • Goalie matchup: S. Murashov (-0.6 GSAx in 4 GP, 88.3% SV) vs K. Vejmelka (-2.4 GSAx in 8 GP, 87.9% SV).
  • The Mammoth are the hotter team by points pace (6-3-0 over their 9 games so far).
Last game's lineup · confirmed at warm-up

Lineups

NHL box score
PIT
vs VGK · Sat, Oct 17
Expected in goal
S. Murashov
1 day rest.737 last start59:42 played
Backup Arturs Silovs · -0.9 GSAx this season
Forwards · 12
  • N. Robertson13:33
  • B. Rust19:02
  • T. Novak12:41
  • C. Dewar12:58
  • E. Soderblom12:09
  • V. Koivunen13:00
  • B. Lizotte13:03
  • A. Kuzmenko13:38
  • R. Rakell19:38
  • E. Malkin12:51
  • B. Kindel15:37
  • S. Crosby18:17
Defence · 6
  • K. Korczak23:53
  • S. Stastney21:34
  • S. Girard11:22
  • K. Letang20:07
  • E. Karlsson21:56
  • D. Carlile21:10
UTA
vs EDM · Sat, Oct 17
Expected in goal
K. Vejmelka
1 day rest.706 last start33:48 played
K. Vejmelka started last game and was relieved by S. Cossa (26:12 of it).
Backup Sebastian Cossa · -1.1 GSAx this season
Forwards · 12
  • N. Schmaltz17:00
  • C. Keller16:42
  • D. Guenther16:54
  • V. Trocheck15:38
  • J. McBain12:19
  • B. Hayton15:11
  • D. But13:04
  • K. Yamamoto16:53
  • L. Crouse12:53
  • A. Lee15:23
  • K. Stenlund13:17
  • L. Cooley17:51
Defence · 6
  • J. Marino20:34
  • A. Peeke17:49
  • D. Simashev17:44
  • M. Weegar22:38
  • N. Schmidt17:01
  • M. Sergachev21:01

Lineups are the players who dressed in each club's last game, with their minutes; clubs confirm tonight's at warm-up. Every player this preview names was in that lineup.

Keep going

Where to next