Panthers run the Blackhawks off the ice on the underlying numbers
The Panthers earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.
The underlying story
S. Knight nearly stole a game. Florida controlled 61% of 5-on-5 expected goals (3.82–2.40 xG) and 66% of shot attempts (37–19), but won 3–2—a margin that understates their dominance. Goaltending variance explains the gap: Chicago's goalie outperformed his expected outcome by 0.82, while Florida underperformed their expected goals by the same amount. The Panthers should have won more decisively.
High-danger chances split 4–4, meaning neither team gained an edge in the most dangerous areas. The turning point came at 9:40 of the third when Jesper Boqvist deflected home from the doorstep.
Florida's rush conversion lagged behind its volume: 3 goals on 34 chances. Chicago, working fewer rush opportunities (17), converted twice at a higher rate. On paper, that efficiency split shouldn't matter when one team controls 66% of shot attempts, yet it kept the scoreboard tighter than the underlying numbers warrant.
Depth sustained Florida's edge. F. Nazar (1G, 1A in 20:14), T. Bertuzzi (2A in 19:10), and T. Teravainen (1G, 1A in 18:05) got it done, but Knight's outperformance was the only reason this game remained competitive.
Three Stars
- #91 F. Nazar — 1G, 1A in 20:14
- #59 T. Bertuzzi — 2A in 19:10
- #86 T. Teravainen — 1G, 1A in 18:05
The danger ladder
FLA went 3-for-17 from medium danger on 1.94 expected goals — 1.1 above expected.
Finishing vs expected
CHI finished -0.4 against expected, FLA -0.8 — S. Knight (CHI) saved 0.8 goals above expected.
Shot diet
Wrist shots carried the volume: CHI went 1-for-5, FLA 1-for-32. FLA scored 3 of theirs off the rush.
- FLA was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 34 rush chances.
- CHI was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 17 rush chances.