Filip Hallander drives the Penguins offense
Filip Hallander: 0G 3A, 1.28 xG/60.

Pittsburgh proved that volume isn't destiny. New York mustered 45% of shot attempts (25–31 on goal) but collected just 41% of expected goals—a gap that became insurmountable when the Rangers couldn't bury their chances.
The Penguins controlled the underlying numbers decisively. Pittsburgh generated 4.21 xG to New York's 2.91, a 59–41 split. More importantly, PIT's average shot carried 0.069 xG, vs. 0.049 for NYR—evidence of a cleaner attack. Pittsburgh converted 2 goals on 26 rush attempts; the Rangers managed 0 on five high-danger chances.
A. Silovs was the story that didn't need to be told. The Pittsburgh goalie stopped all 25 shots and saved 2.91 goals above expected. I. Shesterkin, meanwhile, made 28 of 29 saves (+3.21 above expected) and still watched his team get shut out. His performance was excellent. His offense wasn't.
The turning point came early: Blake Lizotte's wrist shot from the wing at 18:08 of the first period. From there, New York couldn't recover. The Rangers' 0-for-5 on high-danger chances underperformed even pessimistic expectations. They created five rebound opportunities and converted none. That won't happen often—but it happened tonight.
Penguins shut out the Rangers, 3-0
The Penguins earned this one.
The board read PIT 3, NYR 0. The chances read PIT 4.2, NYR 2.9.
The Rangers left 2.9 goals on the table against what their chances were worth.
The Rangers went 0 for 5 from the slot.
Penguins shut out the Rangers, 3-0
A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.
Read the full breakdownscore reads PIT–NYR
NYR went 0-for-10 from medium danger on 1.16 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.
PIT finished -1.2 against expected, NYR -2.9.
Wrist shots carried the volume: PIT went 2-for-24, NYR 0-for-17. PIT scored 2 of theirs off the rush.
Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.
The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5
Each club shoots toward its own end — PIT left, NYR right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.
The model projects a 3.2–3.2 game with the Penguins at 51% win probability: no daylight between these two.
Pittsburgh owns the underlying play. At 5v5, the Penguins sit at 50.8% xG% and 50.2% Corsi%, while New York trails at 47.5% xG% and 48.6% Corsi%. In close games, those margins separate who controls the shot from who's chasing it. The Penguins' 1.012 PDO and the Rangers' 1.009 sit beside each other—neither team running hot enough to skew the outcome.
That structural edge rests on Filip Hallander. The Penguins' driver generates chances at 1.28 xG/60 with 0G 3A—a playmaker without a goal. The Rangers' job is simple: neutralize Hallander, and Pittsburgh loses its gas.
But Pittsburgh has a second engine. Rickard Rakell carries 1.01 xG/60, 13G 13A, 3 high-danger goals, and a 12.1% shooting rate. If Rakell's finishing holds, neutralizing Hallander alone doesn't slow the Penguins.
New York's answer is Adam Sykora. At 0.91 xG/60 with 3G 1A and a 20.0% shooting rate, he's scoring without high-danger chances—an unsustainable finishing run. That's the kind of streak that decides pick'em games. Gabe Perreault steadies the Rangers' balance: 0.79 xG/60, 8G 11A, 2 high-danger goals, 13.1% shooting. The Penguins' task mirrors Pittsburgh's: contain Sykora's scoring, and New York's offense flattens.
Here's the wrinkle: both teams sit at 0% on high-danger and rebound goals, which means scoring is either quality-starved or luck-depleted. Pittsburgh's Caleb Jones and New York's Vincent Iorio emerge as defensive weak links. If one cracks, the other team's shooters inherit space.
In the end, this is a game of countermeasures. The Rangers must shut down Hallander while riding Sykora's unsustainable streak. The Penguins must trust Rakell's finishing while containing Sykora. The model can't split a difference that narrow. Neither can we.
Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.
PIT by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score PIT 3.2–3.2 NYR; 16% chance it's tied after 60.
PIT holds 4 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.012 vs 1.009) says PIT has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.
Filip Hallander: 0G 3A, 1.28 xG/60.
Key matchup: Neutralize Filip Hallander (0G, 1.28 xG/60, 0 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Filip Hallander (0G, 1.28 xG/60, 0 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Adam Sykora (3G, 0.91 xG/60, 0 HD goals)
Key matchup: Neutralize Adam Sykora (3G, 0.91 xG/60, 0 HD goals)
Caleb Jones is on ice for 3.26 xGA/60 and 4 high-danger shots against this season.
Hunt matchups against Caleb Jones's shifts with the top line.