Backcheck
Recap · DAL at WPG

Stars hold off the Jets

The Stars earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJun 16, 2:20 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
DAL
Dallas Stars
5
Home
WPG
Winnipeg Jets
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

4.89Expected goals3.59
58% share for the better side
37Shot attempts (SOG)25
7High-danger chances7
58Corsi (all attempts)56
Score-adjusted: 46% / 54%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Dallas controlled the game through volume and accuracy, then barely held on. The Stars held 58% of expected goals (4.89–3.59 xG)—a 16-point advantage that should have yielded more than a one-goal cushion. High-danger chances finished even at 7-7: Winnipeg found the most dangerous spots to generate offense despite being dominated in the shot battle overall.

Dallas's edge was sharpest in quality. The Stars averaged 0.084 xG per shot versus Winnipeg's 0.064, meaning Dallas consistently found better ice real estate. That quality advantage, combined with a volume edge (37 on goal to 25), should have been decisive.

C. Hellebuyck (0.865 SV%, 32 of 37) outplayed J. Oettinger (0.840 SV%, 21 of 25) by a meaningful margin, yet Dallas won. Superior goaltending couldn't overcome Dallas's rebound dominance—the Stars converted 2 of 6 chances versus Winnipeg's 1 of 3, showing superior net-front work. Rush goals were even at 3-3, though Dallas generated more opportunities (32 vs. 26).

Kyle Connor's wrist shot from the high slot in the third period punctuated the action. Dallas's shot quality and efficiency proved decisive in a contest where Winnipeg stayed competitive despite the underlying imbalance.

  • #55 M. Scheifele — 3A in 21:16
  • #81 K. Connor — 3G in 19:45
  • #96 M. Rantanen — 1G, 2A in 18:48
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
DAL1 / 7 · 2.16 xG
WPG2 / 7 · 1.54 xG
Medium dangermid-range
DAL3 / 21 · 2.19 xG
WPG1 / 12 · 1.51 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
DAL1 / 30 · 0.54 xG
WPG1 / 37 · 0.54 xG

DAL went 1-for-7 from high danger on 2.16 expected goals — 1.2 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
DAL
5 G · 4.89 xG · +0.1
WPG
4 G · 3.59 xG · +0.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. OettingerDAL
-0.4
C. HellebuyckWPG
-0.1

DAL finished +0.1 against expected, WPG +0.4 — J. Oettinger (DAL) allowed 0.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
DAL
WRIST4/31
SLAP0/5
TIP IN0/4
SNAP1/4
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/9
WPG
WRIST3/22
SLAP0/4
TIP IN0/3
SNAP0/2
BACKHAND1/2
DEFLECTED0/1
BAT0/1
POKE0/1
OTHER0/20
DAL
WPG
Off the rush
3 G on 32 · 2.88 xG
3 G on 26 · 2.53 xG
Off rebounds
2 G on 6 · 0.77 xG
1 G on 3 · 0.51 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: DAL went 4-for-31, WPG 3-for-22. DAL scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Scheifele
#55 · C ·
0 G · 3 A · 1 SOG · 21:16 TOI · +2
K. Connor
#81 · L ·
3 G · 0 A · 6 SOG · 19:45 TOI · +1
M. Rantanen
#96 · R ·
1 G · 2 A · 3 SOG · 18:48 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • DAL had the higher quality looks — 0.084 xG/shot vs 0.064.
  • WPG was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • DAL was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 32 rush chances.
  • WPG created 3 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • DAL created 6 rebound opportunities (2 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · DAL at WPG · 8:00 PM ET

Stars at Jets: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 2:18 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
DAL
Model favorite
51%
49%
DAL50WPG

DAL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score DAL 2.52.4 WPG; 19% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

DAL← edge
edge →WPG
51.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
47.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.36xGF / 602.34
2.29xGA / 602.55
2.07Goals for / gm1.90
1.68Goals against / gm2.10
1.024PDO — luck, not skill0.998

DAL holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.024 vs 0.998) says DAL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The projection models come out near-perfect parity: Dallas at 2.5 expected goals against Winnipeg's 2.4, with the Jets holding exactly 50% win probability. You're picking sides on a coin.

But the underlying data pulls slightly Dallas's way. The Stars own the 5v5 play with 51.0% expected goals share against Winnipeg's 48.0%—a narrow edge that matters over 60 minutes. Winnipeg's 49.0% Corsi contradicts this (Dallas sits at 47.0%), suggesting they're getting fortunate with shot quality. Dallas is also the hotter team, running 5-1-0 over their last 10 games.

That form, however, masks a liability. Dallas's 1.024 PDO ranks well above Winnipeg's 0.998, meaning the Stars are burying their chances at an elevated rate. Expect some regression. Winnipeg's PDO sits closer to the mean—their true underlying talent may be closer than the scoreboard suggests.

Jason Robertson anchors Dallas's attack at 0.96 xG/60 with 25 goals and 21 assists, shooting at a sustainable 12.4%. Arttu Hyry, listed day-to-day with a lower-body injury, will miss this game, weakening Dallas's forward depth. Kyle Connor leads Winnipeg's scoresheet with 25 goals and 30 assists, operating at 0.83 xG/60 with a 13.0% shooting rate. Nino Niederreiter offers Winnipeg's sharpest underlying edge: 0.87 xG/60 paired with 6 goals and 6 assists.

Tyler Myers anchors Dallas's defense as the primary liability; Colin Miller fills that role for Winnipeg.

The honest reading: Dallas has been the better team, but they're running hot. Winnipeg is executing fine—they're just not getting the bounces yet. In a near-pick'em like this, expect the Jets to tighten up on the road and make this closer than Dallas would prefer.

Three Things to Watch

  • Jason Robertson's workload and whether Winnipeg can contain Dallas's best player
  • Arttu Hyry's status—his absence reshuffles Dallas's forward balance
  • Which team's PDO normalizes—Dallas at 1.024 likely can't hold
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

DAL
Jason Robertson25G 21A
0.96 xG/60 · 2 HD · 12.4% sh
Arttu Hyry2G 2A
0.84 xG/60 · 0 HD · 9.1% sh
WPG
Nino Niederreiter6G 6A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 8.6% sh
Kyle Connor25G 30A
0.83 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.0% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters