Backcheck
Recap · WSH at NYI

Capitals run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

By the ModelJun 16, 2:28 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
WSH
Washington Capitals
4
Home
NYI
New York Islanders
2
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

5.28Expected goals3.38
61% share for the better side
29Shot attempts (SOG)36
9High-danger chances4
69Corsi (all attempts)71
Score-adjusted: 42% / 58%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

New York held 55% of shot attempts (36–29), a volume advantage that meant nothing. The Islanders lost 4–2, undone by the quality gap. Washington controlled 61% of 5v5 expected goals (5.28–3.38), a margin built on nine high-danger chances to four.

The Capitals won despite going scoreless on nine high-danger chances—a conversion rate that won't hold. Their dominance came elsewhere: they were efficient on the rush (two goals on 26 attempts) and relentless at 5v5 (61% xG). New York's power play was dominant (two goals on 21 shots, 1.67 xG), but couldn't generate at even strength, where Washington controlled the game.

L. Thompson was decisive. He stopped 34 of 36 shots, posting a 0.944 save percentage that outperformed expected goals against by 1.38. I. Sorokin faced 29 shots and gave up four (0.862 SV%), though he was unbeatable on high-danger chances (100% save rate on nine HD shots). That perfect performance proved immaterial: Washington's overall efficiency was simply dominant.

Three Stars

  • #21 A. Protas — 2G, 1A in 19:19
  • #21 K. Palmieri — 2A in 20:41
  • #14 B. Horvat — 2A in 20:37
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH0 / 9 · 2.70 xG
NYI1 / 4 · 0.99 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH3 / 19 · 2.23 xG
NYI0 / 13 · 1.52 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 41 · 0.36 xG
NYI1 / 54 · 0.87 xG

WSH went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.70 expected goals — 2.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
4 G · 5.28 xG · -1.3
NYI
2 G · 3.38 xG · -1.4
0123456
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
L. ThompsonWSH
+1.4
I. SorokinNYI
+1.3

WSH finished -1.3 against expected, NYI -1.4 — L. Thompson (WSH) saved 1.4 goals above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST2/8
SNAP1/25
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND1/3
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/25
NYI
WRIST1/36
SNAP0/2
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/2
POKE1/1
OTHER0/21
WSH
NYI
Off the rush
2 G on 26 · 3.23 xG
1 G on 32 · 1.80 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.56 xG
0 G on 7 · 1.13 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 2-for-8, NYI 1-for-36. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Protas
#21 · L ·
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 19:19 TOI · +3
K. Palmieri
#21 · C ·
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:41 TOI · -2
B. Horvat
#14 · C ·
0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 20:37 TOI · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • NYI had the shot volume but the chances weren't dangerous.
  • L. Thompson (WSH) stopped 1.4 goals above expected.
  • WSH had the higher quality looks — 0.077 xG/shot vs 0.048.
  • WSH couldn't convert — 0/9 on high-danger chances. That won't happen often.
  • WSH was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 26 rush chances.
  • NYI created 7 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • WSH created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • I. Sorokin was a wall on HD chances — 100% SV on 9 high-danger shots.
  • NYI power play was dominant — 2 PPG on 21 PP shots (1.67 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · WSH at NYI · 7:00 PM ET

Capitals at Islanders: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJul 11, 12:22 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

50%
NYI
Model favorite
50%
50%
WSH50NYI

NYI by 0 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 2.72.7 NYI; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

WSH← edge
edge →NYI
50.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
49.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.62xGF / 602.48
2.62xGA / 602.69
2.18Goals for / gm1.78
1.79Goals against / gm1.94
1.018PDO — luck, not skill0.993

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.018 vs 0.993) says WSH has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model projects 2.7-2.7, with the Islanders at 50% win probability—a true coin flip.

Washington is hotter: 5-2-0 in their last 10 compared to New York's -7 goal differential over the same span. But the underlying metrics suggest this edge is illusory. The Capitals' expected-goals percentage (50.0%) barely exceeds the Islanders' (48.0%), while both sides own identical Corsi% at 49.0%. Washington's PDO sits at 1.018, meaning they're finishing at an unsustainable rate—regression is coming.

Four forwards matter most. Alex Ovechkin (19G, 17A, 0.97 xG/60, 13.8% shooting, 2 high-danger goals) is generating elite volume and converting it at an elite rate. Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 9A, 0.89 xG/60, 10.4% shooting, 2 high-danger goals) provides secondary scoring punch. For the Islanders, Anders Lee (9G, 20A, 1.20 xG/60, 6.4% shooting, 2 high-danger goals) is actually creating more dangerous chances than his goal total suggests—he's the highest-expected-value scorer in the matchup. Bo Horvat (18G, 10A, 0.87 xG/60, 12.8% shooting, 3 high-danger goals) has more goals but from lower-quality opportunities.

The Islanders' -7 goal differential despite shot parity hints at either depth-line weakness or goaltending variance. Washington's shooting luck will regress; if it does, the Capitals' apparent form edge evaporates. Washington's Declan Chisholm and New York's Alexander Romanov are both defensive liabilities. Whichever team exposes the other's becomes the marginal difference.

This game turns on variance, not scheme. The model read it correctly.

Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters