Motion-blurred skater in a Washington Capitals sweater
Breakdown · WSH at NYI

Capitals run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

The verdict · earned

The Capitals earned it — the game and the expected-goals battle both.

WSH 4 · NYI 2
◆ By the ModelJun 16, 2:28 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

New York held 55% of shot attempts (36–29), a volume advantage that meant nothing. The Islanders lost 4–2, undone by the quality gap. Washington controlled 61% of 5v5 expected goals (5.28–3.38), a margin built on nine high-danger chances to four.

The Capitals won despite going scoreless on nine high-danger chances—a conversion rate that won't hold. Their dominance came elsewhere: they were efficient on the rush (two goals on 26 attempts) and relentless at 5v5 (61% xG). New York's power play was dominant (two goals on 21 shots, 1.67 xG), but couldn't generate at even strength, where Washington controlled the game.

L. Thompson was decisive. He stopped 34 of 36 shots, posting a 0.944 save percentage that outperformed expected goals against by 1.38. I. Sorokin faced 29 shots and gave up four (0.862 SV%), though he was unbeatable on high-danger chances (100% save rate on nine HD shots). That perfect performance proved immaterial: Washington's overall efficiency was simply dominant.

Three Stars

  • #21 A. Protas — 2G, 1A in 19:19
  • #21 K. Palmieri — 2A in 20:41
  • #14 B. Horvat — 2A in 20:37
The breakdown in twelve frames

Swipe it

Every number is from this page
Final · Oct 11
WSH
4
NYI
2

Capitals run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

Chances 5.3 – 3.4Did they deserve it? →
Did they deserve it?

The Capitals earned this one.

Expected goals · chance value
WSH
5.28
NYI
3.38
61% of the chances39%

The board read WSH 4, NYI 2. The chances read WSH 5.3, NYI 3.4.

Our xG model · NHL play-by-play · all situations
Luck check
WSH
−1.3
goals above expected
WSH5.28 expected · 4 scored
Expected
Scored
NYI3.38 expected · 2 scored
Expected
Scored

Both sides finished close to what their chances were worth. This one was earned on the ice.

PDO = sh% + sv% · drifts to 1.000 over a season
Every goal, in order
  1. P1 01:50WSHM. Fehérváry1–0
  2. P1 13:52WSHA. Protas2–0
  3. P2 09:50WSHR. Leonard3–0
  4. P2 15:30WSHA. Protas4–0
  5. P2 18:51NYIA. DuclairPP4–1
  6. P3 04:28NYIM. SchaeferPP4–2
NHL play-by-play · chance value from our xG model
Where the shots came from
WSH
44 shots
4
Final
94 shots
NYI
50 shots
2
WSH attackNYI attack
WSH NYI Goal
44
shots · 4 in
50
shots · 2 in
Every unblocked shot · press play to replay it
Chances by danger
WSHNYI
0 / 9
2.70 xG
High danger
1 / 4
0.99 xG
3 / 19
2.23 xG
Medium
0 / 13
1.52 xG
1 / 41
0.36 xG
Low
1 / 54
0.87 xG

High-danger looks: WSH 0 of 9, NYI 1 of 4.

Danger tiers by our xG model · high ≥ 20% chance
In the net
B+
L. Thompson
+1.4
WSH · 34/36
B+
I. Sorokin
+1.3
NYI · 25/29
The numbers, checked
BACKCHECK

Capitals run the Islanders off the ice on the underlying numbers

A model, not a newsroom. Every number on these frames comes from the NHL's play-by-play and our own models. Nothing was watched, guessed or heard from anyone.

Read the full breakdown
backcheckreport.com
01 / 08 · Final
Every goal, in order

How it happened

NHL play-by-play
1stshots 9–3
  1. 01:50WSHM. Fehérváry(A. Ovechkin, J. Carlson)1–0
  2. 13:52WSHA. Protas(J. Chychrun, T. Wilson)2–0
2ndshots 14–13
  1. 09:50WSHR. Leonard(J. Chychrun, A. Protas)3–0
  2. 15:30WSHA. Protas4–0
  3. 18:51NYIA. Duclairpower play(B. Horvat, K. Palmieri)4–1
3rdshots 6–20
  1. 04:28NYIM. Schaeferpower play(K. Palmieri, B. Horvat)4–2

score reads WSH–NYI

Source · NHL play-by-play (api-web.nhle.com)
Process vs result

The numbers

XGBoost xG · NHL play-by-play
5.28
WSH chances
Goals their shots were worth
−1.3
Finishing
Goals below what those chances were worth
1.030
WSH puck luck
Above 1.000 — the bounces went their way
49.3%
Shot attempts
Under half — they were outshot
Split by club

Who controlled the game

5.28Expected goals3.38
WSH 61% of the chance quality
29Shots on goal36
9High-danger chances4
69All attempts (Corsi)71
Adjusted for score: WSH 42% · NYI 58%
Faceoffs · NYI won61%off56%neu44%def
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
WSH0 / 9 · 2.70 xG
NYI1 / 4 · 0.99 xG
Medium dangermid-range
WSH3 / 19 · 2.23 xG
NYI0 / 13 · 1.52 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
WSH1 / 41 · 0.36 xG
NYI1 / 54 · 0.87 xG

WSH went 0-for-9 from high danger on 2.70 expected goals — 2.7 left on the table.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
WSH
4 G · 5.28 xG · -1.3
NYI
2 G · 3.38 xG · -1.4
0123456

WSH finished -1.3 against expected, NYI -1.4.

Source · Backcheck xG model
Shot types · rush and rebound chancesopen +
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
WSH
WRIST2/8
SNAP1/25
TIP IN0/5
BACKHAND1/3
SLAP0/2
DEFLECTED0/1
POKE0/0
OTHER0/25
NYI
WRIST1/36
SNAP0/2
TIP IN0/6
BACKHAND0/2
SLAP0/1
DEFLECTED0/2
POKE1/1
OTHER0/21
WSH
NYI
Off the rush
2 G on 26
3.23 xG
1 G on 32
1.80 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4
0.56 xG
0 G on 7
1.13 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: WSH went 2-for-8, NYI 1-for-36. WSH scored 2 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
New to these numbers?

Two things happened in this game: who created the better chances, and who put the puck in the net. They are not the same thing, and this page separates them on purpose.

The one to watch is expected goals— the best single read on who deserved to win. When it disagrees with the scoreboard, that disagreement is usually the story. Nothing here is a projection; every figure is computed from this game's play-by-play. Full glossary →

xG
Expected goals. Every shot scored by how often that exact look goes in. 2.5 xG means the chances were worth about two and a half goals.
HD
High-danger chances — shots from the slot and the crease, where shots actually become goals.
Corsi
Every shot attempt, including the ones that missed or got blocked. A rough read on who had the puck.
Adj.
Score-adjusted. Teams that trail shoot more and teams that lead sit back, so this corrects the attempt count for the scoreboard.
GSAx
Goals saved above expected. A positive number means the goalie stopped more than an average goalie would have on those shots.
PDO
Shooting % plus save % — a luck gauge. It sits near 1.000 over a season, so a game far from it usually means the bounces decided it.
Shot by shot

In the net

Graded on goals saved above expected
L. Thompson
WSH · 34/36 · .944
+1.4
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger1/41.0-0.0
Medium0/131.5+1.5
Low1/540.9-0.1

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

I. Sorokin
NYI · 25/29 · .862
+1.3
saved above expected
B+
the night
By dangerG/attxGsaved
High danger0/92.7+2.7
Medium3/192.2-0.8
Low1/410.4-0.6

A+ ≥ +2.5 saved above expected · A ≥ +1.5 · B+ ≥ +0.75 · B ≥ +0.25 · C ≥ −0.25 · D ≥ −0.75 · F below −1.5

94 shots · press play to watch the game back

Where the shots came from

NHL play-by-play coordinates
WSH
44 shots
4
Final
94 shots
NYI
50 shots
2
WSH attackNYI attack
WSH NYI Goal

Each club shoots toward its own end — WSH left, NYI right — the way you would watch it. A dot's size is how dangerous the look was, from distance and angle; it is a proxy for shot quality, not the xG model the article is written from. Hover a dot for the shooter and the clock.

Ranked from the box score

Three stars

Points first
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Protas
#21 · L · —
2 G · 1 A · 5 SOG · 19:19 on ice · +3
K. Palmieri
#21 · C · —
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 20:41 on ice · -2
B. Horvat
#14 · C · —
0 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 20:37 on ice · -1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model said beforehand

Before the game

Written Sat, Oct 11
Open the pre-game read
Written from the numbers

The read

Edited for clarity
◆ By the ModelSep 22, 12:45 AMEdited for clarityDrafted from NHL play-by-play by Backcheck's model, worded for clarity by an AI editor that may not change a number. Nobody at Backcheck was at the rink. How this works

The model projects a WSH 3.3–3.4 NYI game with the Islanders at 50% win probability.

Anders Lee's 1.20 xG/60 and 2 high-danger goals establish him as the engine of the Islanders' offense; he's 9G 20A on the season. The Capitals will need to neutralize him, just as the Islanders must account for Anthony Beauvillier's production: 14G 9A with an 0.89 xG/60 and 2 high-danger conversions. Washington also deploys Aliaksei Protas, who's 17G 19A with a 13.5% shooting rate, while New York counters with Bo Horvat at 18G 10A and 12.8% shooting.

The season 5v5 numbers marginally favor Washington: 49.6% xG% against New York's 47.7%, and nearly identical Corsi% (49.5% to 49.0%). Washington's vulnerability is its PDO—1.018 to the Islanders' 0.992. That's running hot, and regression is expected. In a contest this tight, such swings can decide the outcome.

Both teams carry defensive weak links: Declan Chisholm for Washington, Alexander Romanov for New York. The models don't see daylight between them. A 50% win probability is the market's honest assessment: pick your reason to believe, and the other side has an equally valid counter.

Season rates in this preview are from 2025-26 — this season's sample isn't live yet.

What the model said beforehand

The model's lean

NYI 51%
51%
NYI
Model favorite
49%
51%
WSH50NYI

NYI by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score WSH 3.3–3.4 NYI; 16% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season rates · 5v5

Tale of the tape

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH← edge
edge →NYI
49.6%47.7%
49.5%49.0%
3.233.13
3.293.43
3.182.79
2.902.88
1.0180.992

WSH holds 5 of 6 process categories — and the luck row (1.018 vs 0.992) says WSH has been getting the bounces, which tends not to last.

Source · NHL stats API + our xG · 5v5
Form · No games yet
WSH
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
NYI
0-0-0
+0 GD · 0d rest
1.018
WSH PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
0.992
NYI PDO
Luck gauge · drifts to 1.000
What decides it

Keys to the game

TACTICALNYI

Shutdown Assignment: Islanders

Key matchup: Neutralize Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

Key matchup: Neutralize Anthony Beauvillier (14G, 0.89 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

TACTICALWSH

Shutdown Assignment: Capitals

Key matchup: Neutralize Anders Lee (9G, 1.20 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

Key matchup: Neutralize Anders Lee (9G, 1.20 xG/60, 2 HD goals)

STRENGTHNYI

Anders Lee drives the Islanders offense

Anders Lee: 9G 20A, 1.20 xG/60, 2 high-danger goals.

WARNINGWSH

Exploitable minutes: Declan Chisholm

Declan Chisholm is on ice for 3.21 xGA/60 and 25 high-danger shots against this season.

Hunt matchups against Declan Chisholm's shifts with the top line.

Regression watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Things to watch
  • The Capitals' PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NHL stats API · our xG
WSH
Alex Ovechkin19G 17A
0.97 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.8% sh
Anthony Beauvillier14G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 2 HD · 10.4% sh
NYI
Anders Lee9G 20A
1.20 xG/60 · 2 HD · 6.4% sh
Bo Horvat18G 10A
0.87 xG/60 · 3 HD · 12.8% sh
Keep going

Where to next