Backcheck
Recap · CBJ at MIN

Blue Jackets pull away from the Wild

The Blue Jackets stole one. They lost the expected-goals battle 3.57–4.77 and won anyway.

By the ModelJul 11, 12:43 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
CBJ
Columbus Blue Jackets
7
Home
MIN
Minnesota Wild
4
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

3.57Expected goals4.77
57% share for the better side
32Shot attempts (SOG)52
6High-danger chances6
65Corsi (all attempts)86
Score-adjusted: 38% / 62%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Columbus stole one. Minnesota dominated the expected-goals battle (4.77–3.57, 57% xG), out-shot the Blue Jackets 52–32, and lost 7–4 anyway. The odds caught up with the Wild's goaltending.

The goaltending split decided it. E. Merzlikins saved at 0.923, 0.77 above expectation. F. Gustavsson saved at 0.806, 2.43 below expectation. One played like a star, the other did not.

On the rush, the imbalance widened. Columbus converted at six goals on 29 chances versus Minnesota's two on 43. Even Minnesota's power play—4 goals on 27 shots (2.28 xG)—couldn't bridge a gap that big. High-danger play was a wash (6–6), but Columbus punched above its weight in low-danger territory, scoring three times from spots that shouldn't produce goals. Minnesota created six rebound opportunities and converted one. The variance was too steep.

Boone Jenner's wrist shot from the top of the circles (18:34, third) was the turning point: symbolic of Columbus's night, a moment the scoreboard would eventually reflect.

Three Stars

  • M. Boldy (MIN)—1G, 2A in 25:24
  • Z. Werenski (CBJ)—1G, 2A in 25:20
  • K. Kaprizov (MIN)—2G, 1A in 24:13
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
CBJ2 / 6 · 1.51 xG
MIN3 / 6 · 1.62 xG
Medium dangermid-range
CBJ2 / 12 · 1.25 xG
MIN1 / 18 · 1.91 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
CBJ3 / 47 · 0.81 xG
MIN0 / 62 · 1.25 xG

CBJ went 3-for-47 from low danger on 0.81 expected goals — 2.2 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
CBJ
7 G · 3.57 xG · +3.4
MIN
4 G · 4.77 xG · -0.8
012345678
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
E. MerzlikinsCBJ
+0.8
F. GustavssonMIN
-2.4

CBJ finished +3.4 against expected, MIN -0.8 — F. Gustavsson (MIN) allowed 2.4 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
CBJ
WRIST4/33
SNAP0/1
TIP IN0/2
SLAP2/5
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED1/2
BAT0/0
OTHER0/21
MIN
WRIST1/48
SNAP2/8
TIP IN1/6
SLAP0/3
BACKHAND0/3
DEFLECTED0/0
BAT0/1
OTHER0/17
CBJ
MIN
Off the rush
6 G on 29 · 2.59 xG
2 G on 43 · 3.07 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 4 · 0.55 xG
1 G on 6 · 1.02 xG

Wrist shots carried the volume: CBJ went 4-for-33, MIN 1-for-48. CBJ scored 6 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
M. Boldy
#12 · L · MIN
1 G · 2 A · 5 SOG · 25:24 TOI · -3
Z. Werenski
#8 · D · CBJ
1 G · 2 A · 7 SOG · 25:20 TOI · +4
K. Kaprizov
#97 · L · MIN
2 G · 1 A · 11 SOG · 24:13 TOI · -3
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • CBJ stole this one. MIN owned 57% of the xG and lost.
  • F. Gustavsson (MIN) gave up 2.4 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • MIN was clinical in the high-danger zone — 3/6 on HD chances (50%).
  • CBJ scored 3 goals from low-danger spots — the opposing goalie needs to have those.
  • MIN was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 43 rush chances.
  • CBJ was lethal off the rush — 6 goals on 29 rush chances.
  • MIN created 6 rebound opportunities (1 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ created 4 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • CBJ outperformed their expected goals by 3.4 — elite finishing or lucky bounces.
  • MIN power play was dominant — 4 PPG on 27 PP shots (2.28 xG).
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · CBJ at MIN · 8:00 PM ET

Blue Jackets at Wild: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 2:27 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

52%
MIN
Model favorite
48%
52%
CBJ50MIN

MIN by 4 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score CBJ 2.52.6 MIN; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

CBJ← edge
edge →MIN
52.0%5v5 xG%52.0%
51.0%Corsi%48.0%
2.63xGF / 602.55
2.43xGA / 602.40
2.12Goals for / gm2.04
1.98Goals against / gm1.93
1.003PDO — luck, not skill1.007

The season numbers split 33 — no clear process edge — and PDO (1.003 vs 1.007) says MIN has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees this as essentially a toss-up: a 2.5 to 2.6 goal differential favoring Minnesota, with the Wild projected at 52% win probability. This is pick'em territory.

Minnesota arrives hotter, posting a 4-2-1 record over their last 10 games. Columbus has struggled lately, sitting at minus-5 goal differential across that same span. But the underlying talent lines are remarkably even — both teams generate 52.0% expected goals, though Columbus's Corsi at 51.0% suggests they'll control more puck possession than Minnesota's 48.0%.

On paper, Boone Jenner is Columbus's offensive engine. He's produced at 0.98 expected goals per 60 minutes with 11 goals and 21 assists, backed by a 9.6% shooting percentage and 2 high-danger goals. Mathieu Olivier, who'd normally pair as a complementary scorer at 0.89 xG/60 with 12 goals and 9 assists, is day-to-day with an upper-body injury and likely unavailable.

Minnesota counters with Hunter Haight, who's generated 1.23 expected goals per 60 minutes — the standout rate in this matchup — though he's converted that into just 1 goal and 1 assist on 8.3% shooting. Matt Boldy is the safer bet: 0.89 xG/60 with a 13.7% shooting percentage, 22 goals, 18 assists, and 5 high-danger goals.

Both teams have matching PDO values (Columbus 1.003, Minnesota 1.007) — they're shooting at roughly league-average rates. Columbus's shot dominance (51.0% Corsi) matches Minnesota's recent dominance (4-2-1 in last 10), while expected goals are perfectly even at 52.0%. F. Gustavsson and J. Greaves, both on back-to-backs, become the deciding factor — whichever is fresher will matter most.

Three Things to Watch

  • Columbus drives Corsi at 51.0% — expect a territorial tilt favoring the Blue Jackets.
  • F. Gustavsson is on a back-to-back for Minnesota — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
  • J. Greaves is on a back-to-back for Columbus — watch for a backup start or a tired starter.
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

CBJ
Boone Jenner11G 21A
0.98 xG/60 · 2 HD · 9.6% sh
Mathieu Olivier12G 9A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 13.3% sh
MIN
Hunter Haight1G 1A
1.23 xG/60 · 0 HD · 8.3% sh
Matt Boldy22G 18A
0.89 xG/60 · 5 HD · 13.7% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters