Backcheck
Recap · NYR at MTL

Rangers hold off the Canadiens

The Rangers won a genuine coin flip — neither side controlled the run of play.

By the ModelJun 16, 3:01 PMxG: xgboost-0.758Edited for clarity
Away
NYR
New York Rangers
4
Home
MTL
Montreal Canadiens
3
FINAL
Process vs result

The underlying story

2.67Expected goals2.46
52% share for the better side
22Shot attempts (SOG)24
3High-danger chances2
51Corsi (all attempts)51
Score-adjusted: 52% / 48%
Source · NHL play-by-play · XGBoost xG

Montreal controlled the game on paper — 52% of shot attempts and a 3-2 disadvantage in high-danger chances — but fell short where it mattered. S. Montembeault gave up 1.33 goals more than expected, a gap that proved decisive in a coin-flip matchup (2.46–2.67 xG), sending Montreal to a 4-3 loss.

The underlying play was tight. Montreal generated 24 shot attempts to New York's 22, and the expected-goals margin favored the Rangers only marginally (52–48). But expected goals is not destiny. The Rangers overperformed theirs by 1.33 — converting 3 of 23 rush chances while Montreal converted 2 of 18.

Noah Dobson's snap shot from the wing (P3, 08:26) was the turning point. By the end, the Rangers had the goals when it counted; the Canadiens had the prettier statistics.

Three Stars

  • #10 A. Panarin — 1G, 3A in 20:05
  • #23 A. Fox — 2A in 25:02
  • #93 M. Zibanejad — 1G, 1A in 22:16
How the game was won

The danger ladder

shotsgoalsexpected
High dangerslot & crease
NYR1 / 3 · 0.66 xG
MTL0 / 2 · 0.50 xG
Medium dangermid-range
NYR2 / 15 · 1.48 xG
MTL2 / 13 · 1.41 xG
Low dangerperimeter & point
NYR1 / 33 · 0.53 xG
MTL1 / 36 · 0.55 xG

MTL went 2-for-13 from medium danger on 1.41 expected goals — 0.6 above expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL play-by-play
The luck layer

Finishing vs expected

expectedactual
NYR
4 G · 2.67 xG · +1.3
MTL
3 G · 2.46 xG · +0.5
012345
Goalies · GSAx (goals saved above expected)
J. QuickNYR
-0.5
S. MontembeaultMTL
-1.3

NYR finished +1.3 against expected, MTL +0.5 — S. Montembeault (MTL) allowed 1.3 more goals than expected.

Source · Backcheck xG model
What they shot — and what went in

Shot diet

goalsshots
NYR
SNAP1/24
SLAP2/8
TIP IN0/4
WRIST0/1
BACKHAND0/2
DEFLECTED1/1
OTHER0/11
MTL
SNAP3/29
SLAP0/2
TIP IN0/2
WRIST0/3
BACKHAND0/1
DEFLECTED0/0
OTHER0/14
NYR
MTL
Off the rush
3 G on 23 · 2.05 xG
2 G on 18 · 1.80 xG
Off rebounds
0 G on 3 · 0.27 xG
0 G on 3 · 0.33 xG

Snap shots carried the volume: NYR went 1-for-24, MTL 3-for-29. NYR scored 3 of theirs off the rush.

Source · Backcheck xG model · NHL shot types
Three stars · computed, not voted
A. Panarin
#10 · L · NYR
1 G · 3 A · 3 SOG · 20:05 TOI · +2
A. Fox
#23 · D · NYR
0 G · 2 A · 2 SOG · 25:02 TOI · +1
M. Zibanejad
#93 · C · NYR
1 G · 1 A · 3 SOG · 22:16 TOI · +1
Ranked from the box score — points first · Backcheck
What the model flagged
  • S. Montembeault (MTL) gave up 1.3 goals more than expected — well below their workload.
  • MTL was lethal off the rush — 2 goals on 18 rush chances.
  • NYR was lethal off the rush — 3 goals on 23 rush chances.
  • MTL created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
  • NYR created 3 rebound opportunities (0 converted) — crashing the net effectively.
Before the game — the model's pre-game read
Preview · NYR at MTL · 7:00 PM ET

Rangers at Canadiens: a genuine coin flip

By the ModelJun 16, 3:00 PMEdited for clarity
Win probability

The model's lean

51%
MTL
Model favorite
49%
51%
NYR50MTL

MTL by 2 points of win probability — effectively a coin flip. Projected score NYR 2.42.5 MTL; 18% chance it's tied after 60.

Source · Backcheck Poisson projection · season scoring rates
Season profile · edge from the spine

Tale of the tape

NYR← edge
edge →MTL
48.0%5v5 xG%48.0%
49.0%Corsi%49.0%
2.26xGF / 602.41
2.40xGA / 602.62
1.88Goals for / gm2.24
1.90Goals against / gm1.96
1.009PDO — luck, not skill1.018

MTL holds 4 of 6 process categories — and PDO (1.009 vs 1.018) says MTL has run hotter.

Source · MoneyPuck season tables · 5v5

The model sees this as nearly even: Rangers 2.4, Canadiens 2.5, Montreal at 51% win probability. This is as close to a pick'em as the numbers get.

The underlying structure is symmetric. Both teams show 48.0% expected goals share and 49.0% Corsi percentage at 5v5—identical territorial control and shot quality.

The forward matchups are sharp. Cole Caufield leads Montreal with 0.97 xG per 60 minutes, 33 goals, and 20.0% shooting. Brendan Gallagher supports at 0.89 xG/60 with five goals on 4.6% shooting. For New York, Adam Sykora produces at 0.91 xG/60 with three goals on 20.0% shooting. Gabe Perreault offers secondary punch: 0.79 xG/60, eight goals, 13.1% shooting.

Neither team has scored from high-danger chances or rebounds. New York's Vincent Iorio and Montreal's Mike Matheson represent weak points in their respective back ends, and in a game where secondary scoring is absent, defensive miscues could prove decisive. New York's PDO sits at 1.009.

Three Things to Watch

  • Montreal is the hotter team by points pace (7-3-0 in their last 10).
  • Montreal PDO is 1.018 — running hot, expect some regression.
Computed danger · scouting

Players to watch

NYR
Adam Sykora3G 1A
0.91 xG/60 · 0 HD · 20.0% sh
Gabe Perreault8G 11A
0.79 xG/60 · 2 HD · 13.1% sh
MTL
Cole Caufield33G 16A
0.97 xG/60 · 1 HD · 20.0% sh
Brendan Gallagher5G 13A
0.89 xG/60 · 1 HD · 4.6% sh
Source · MoneyPuck skaters